高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

阵列乘法器通路时延故障的内建自测试

杨德才 陈光礻禹 谢永乐

杨德才, 陈光礻禹, 谢永乐. 阵列乘法器通路时延故障的内建自测试[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2009, 31(1): 238-241. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01007
引用本文: 杨德才, 陈光礻禹, 谢永乐. 阵列乘法器通路时延故障的内建自测试[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2009, 31(1): 238-241. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01007
Yang De-cai, Chen Guang-ju, Xie Yong-le. Built-in Self-Test Scheme for Path Delay Fault of Array Multiplier[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2009, 31(1): 238-241. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01007
Citation: Yang De-cai, Chen Guang-ju, Xie Yong-le. Built-in Self-Test Scheme for Path Delay Fault of Array Multiplier[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2009, 31(1): 238-241. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01007

阵列乘法器通路时延故障的内建自测试

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01007
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金(90407007)资助课题

Built-in Self-Test Scheme for Path Delay Fault of Array Multiplier

  • 摘要: 阵列乘法器因高度集成和高速运行,容易受到时延故障的困扰。该文对阵列乘法器的通路时延故障提出了一种用累加器实现的以单跳变序列作为测试序列的内建自测试方案。已有的理论和实践表明采用单跳变测试序列比多跳变序列具有更高的测试鲁棒性。同时,该文的测试方案在测试通路覆盖率和测试向量数之间做到了兼顾。仿真结果表明这种单跳变测试序列具有高测试通路覆盖率。此外,测试生成通过系统已有累加器的复用可节省硬件成本开销。
  • 杨德才, 谢永乐, 陈光礻 禹 . VLSI 流水化格型数字滤波器的内建自测试. 电子学报, 2007, 35(11): 55-59.Yang De-cai, Xie Yong-le, and Chen Guang-ju. Built-inself-test for VLSI pipelined lattice digital filter. ActaElectronica Sinica, 2007, 35(11): 55-59.[2]Paschalis A, Gizopoulos D, and Kranitis N. An effective BISTarchitecture for fast multiplier cores. Proc. of Design,Automation and Test in Europe Conference, Munich, 1999:117-121.[3]Gizopoulos D, Paschalis A, and Zorian Y. An effectivebuilt-in self-test scheme for parallel multipliers[J].IEEE Trans.on Computers.1999, 48(9):936-950[4]Psarakis M, Gizopoulos D, and Paschalis A, et al.. Robustand low-cost BIST architectures for sequential fault testing indatapath multipliers. IEEE VLSI Test Symposium, LosAngles, 2001: 15-20.[5]Pomeranz I and Reddy S M. Effectiveness of scan-based delayfault tests in diagnosis of transition faults[J].IET Computers Digital Techniques.2007, 1(5):537-545[6]Konuk H. On invalidation mechanisms for nonrobust delaytests. International Test Conference, Atlantic, 2000: 393-399.[7]Hansen M, Yalcin H, and Hayes J. Unveiling the ISCAS-85benchmarks: a case study in reverse engineering[J].IEEEDesign and Test of Computers.1999, 16(3):72-80[8]Pomeranz I and Reddy S M. An efficient nonenumerativemethod to estimate the path delay fault coverage incombinational circuits. IEEE Trans. on CAD, 1994, 13(2):240-250.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  3493
  • HTML全文浏览量:  102
  • PDF下载量:  601
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2007-06-22
  • 修回日期:  2007-11-12
  • 刊出日期:  2009-01-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回