高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

采用球面几何引导和频域增强SAM的360°全景图像显著目标检测

陈晓雷,  申玉杰,  钟智华

陈晓雷, 申玉杰, 钟智华. 采用球面几何引导和频域增强SAM的360°全景图像显著目标检测[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2026, 48(5): 1985-1996. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251254
引用本文: 陈晓雷, 申玉杰, 钟智华. 采用球面几何引导和频域增强SAM的360°全景图像显著目标检测[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2026, 48(5): 1985-1996. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251254
CHEN Xiaolei, SHEN Yujie, ZHONG Zhihua. Spherical Geometry-guided and Frequency-Enhanced Segment Anything Model for 360° Salient Object Detection[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2026, 48(5): 1985-1996. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251254
Citation: CHEN Xiaolei, SHEN Yujie, ZHONG Zhihua. Spherical Geometry-guided and Frequency-Enhanced Segment Anything Model for 360° Salient Object Detection[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2026, 48(5): 1985-1996. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251254

采用球面几何引导和频域增强SAM的360°全景图像显著目标检测

doi: 10.11999/JEIT251254 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT251254
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金 (61967012)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈晓雷:男,教授,研究方向为人工智能、计算机视觉、虚拟现实

    申玉杰:女,硕士生,研究方向为360°全景图像显著目标检测

    钟智华:男,硕士生,研究方向为360°全景图像显著目标检测

    通讯作者:

    陈晓雷 chenxl703@lut.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: TN911; TP391

Spherical Geometry-guided and Frequency-Enhanced Segment Anything Model for 360° Salient Object Detection

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China(61967012)
  • 摘要: 分割一切模型(SAM)作为通用分割大模型,在多类二维视觉任务中展现出强大迁移能力,但原生SAM主要针对2D平面图像设计,缺乏对360°全景图像球面几何特性的建模能力,难以直接应用于360°全景图像显著目标检测(360° SOD)。为了将SAM应用于360° SOD并解决其不足,该文提出一种采用球面几何引导和频率增强SAM的360° SOD网络,具体包括多认知适配器(MCA),受人类视觉感知机制的启发,通过引入多尺度、多路径特征建模提升全景图像的上下文感知能力;球面几何引导注意力(SGGA),利用球面几何先验缓解等矩形投影中的畸变与边界不连续性;以及空频域联合感知模块(SFJPM),结合多尺度空洞卷积与频域注意力,增强全局与局部信息的协同建模,提升360° SOD性能。该文在现有的两个公开360° SOD数据集(360-SOD, 360-SSOD)上进行了大量实验,结果表明,所提方法在客观指标和主观结果上的表现均优于现有的7种代表性2D SOD方法和7种360° SOD方法。
  • 图  1  本文模型网络结构

    图  2  多认知适配器MCA结构图

    图  3  ERP图像到球体的失真区域变化

    图  4  球面几何引导注意力SGGA结构图

    图  5  空频域联合感知模块SFJPM结构图

    图  6  不同方法在360-SOD数据集上的主观结果比较

    图  7  不同方法在360-SSOD数据集上的主观结果比较

    图  8  360-SOD数据集上不同模型组合的主观结果比较

    图  9  360-SOD数据集上MCA模块消融实验的主观结果比较

    图  10  360-SOD数据集上SGGA模块消融实验的主观结果比较

    表  1  360-SOD和360-SOD数据集上各模型客观指标对比

    类型 方法 360-SOD 数据集 360-SSOD 数据集
    MAE↓ maxF↑ meanF↑ maxE↑ meanE↑ Sm↑ MAE↓ maxF↑ meanF↑ maxE↑ meanE↑ Sm↑
    2D
    SOD
    LDF[4] 0.0234 0.7052 0.6892 0.8659 0.8557 0.8557 0.0315 0.6105 0.5942 0.8464 0.8222 0.7376
    VST[5] 0.0260 0.6941 0.6332 0.8897 0.8361 0.7808 0.0343 0.5975 0.5282 0.8497 0.7681 0.7453
    PGNet[8] 0.0254 0.7221 0.7144 0.8700 0.8440 0.8048 0.0316 0.5969 0.5519 0.8318 0.7404 0.6993
    BBRF[9] 0.0258 0.6571 0.6532 0.8545 0.8510 0.7563 0.0430 0.5155 0.5014 0.8043 0.7991 0.6679
    CeleNet[6] 0.0230 0.7399 0.7280 0.8914 0.8859 0.8095 0.0291 0.6587 0.6513 0.8632 0.8487 0.7592
    MDSAM[2] 0.0163 0.8440 0.8009 0.9329 0.9214 0.8721 0.0266 0.6912 0.6650 0.8648 0.8444 0.7853
    DC-Net-S[7] 0.0202 0.7539 0.7417 0.8964 0.8697 0.8332 0.0265 0.6342 0.6169 0.8456 0.8037 0.7509
    360°
    SOD
    FANet[18] 0.0258 0.6874 0.6631 0.8807 0.8599 0.7778 0.0406 0.6371 0.5753 0.8579 0.7752 0.7330
    MPFRNet[19] 0.0191 0.7653 0.7556 0.8854 0.8750 0.8416 - - - - - -
    LDNet[23] 0.0289 0.6562 0.6391 0.8655 0.8414 0.7679 0.0342 0.5862 0.5672 0.8390 0.8187 0.7245
    DATFormer[24] 0.0179 0.7750 0.7614 0.8989 0.8857 0.8387 0.0287 0.6410 0.6056 0.8631 0.8168 0.7599
    ACoNet[30] 0.0181 0.7893 0.7815 0.9141 0.9043 0.8493 0.0288 0.6641 0.6564 0.8695 0.8632 0.7796
    DSANet[25] 0.0196 0.7843 0.7719 0.9080 0.9002 0.8463 0.0292 0.6743 0.6594 0.8664 0.8354 0.7804
    DPNet[26] 0.0189 0.8035 0.7864 0.9206 0.9096 0.8487 0.0283 0.6690 0.6561 0.8715 0.8512 0.7677
    本文 0.0152 0.8492 0.8334 0.9460 0.9393 0.8768 0.0252 0.6998 0.6800 0.8723 0.8555 0.7912
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  360-SOD数据集上不同模型组合的客观指标对比

    Baseline MCA SGGA SFJPM MAE↓ maxF↑ meanF↑ maxE↑ meanE↑ Sm↑
    √ 0.0189 0.8166 0.7840 0.9223 0.9121 0.8574
    √ √ 0.0169 0.8293 0.7980 0.9213 0.9120 0.8614
    √ √ 0.0175 0.8164 0.7905 0.9246 0.9154 0.8517
    √ √ 0.0172 0.8207 0.7894 0.9252 0.9156 0.8583
    √ √ √ 0.0161 0.8339 0.7988 0.9268 0.9082 0.8715
    √ √ √ 0.0157 0.8359 0.8119 0.9372 0.9261 0.8730
    √ √ √ 0.0162 0.8219 0.8008 0.9145 0.9052 0.8695
    √ √ √ √ 0.0152 0.8493 0.8306 0.9460 0.9393 0.8768
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  360-SOD数据集上MCA模块的消融实验

    方法 MAE↓ maxF↑ meanF↑ maxE↑ meanE↑ Sm↑
    Baseline 0.0189 0.8166 0.7840 0.9223 0.9121 0.8574
    Adapter[11] 0.0178 0.8169 0.7857 0.9200 0.8919 0.8581
    LoRA[12] 0.0178 0.8063 0.7734 0.9088 0.8975 0.8578
    SAM-Mona[13] 0.0176 0.8180 0.7930 0.9159 0.8985 0.8592
    MCA 0.0169 0.8293 0.7980 0.9213 0.9120 0.8614
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  360-SOD数据集上SFJPM模块的消融实验

    模型组成 MAE↓ maxF↑ meanF↑ maxE↑ meanE↑ Sm↑
    本文 w/o FFT 0.0158 0.8265 0.8148 0.9297 0.9086 0.8683
    本文 w/o DC 0.0157 0.8212 0.8051 0.9277 0.9112 0.8744
    本文 0.0152 0.8492 0.8334 0.9460 0.9393 0.8768
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  各模型复杂度对比

    复杂度指标 LDF[4] VST[5] PGNet[8] BBRF[9] CeleNet[6] MDSAM[2] DC-Net-S[7] 本文
    FLOPs(G) 15.5724 31.0892 42.9705 67.1505 11.6932 124.6865 211.2706 248.3677
    Params(M) 25.1501 83.0549 72.6664 74.4025 25.4528 100.2057 509.6138 105.6467
    InferTime(ms) 218.1235 19.9368 98.0829 138.7012 14.2027 36.2441 42.5081 43.8720
    复杂度指标 FANet[18] MPFRNet[19] LDNet*[23] DATFormer[24] ACoNet[30] DSANet[25] DPNet[26] 本文
    FLOPs(G) 340.9447 - 3.4 38.1789 81.2432 66.4029 22.4106 248.3677
    Params(M) 25.3993 - 2.9 29.5681 24.1538 24.5739 78.4854 105.6467
    InferTime(ms) 180.5596 - - 24.4292 50.6232 45.4815 68.5605 43.8720
    注:“-”表示因没有源代码而无法测试的值,“*”表示从原论文中获取的数值。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] CUI Ruikai, HE Siyuan, and QIU Shi. Adaptive low rank adaptation of segment anything to salient object detection[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2308.05426, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.05426.
    [2] GAO Shixuan, ZHANG Pingping, YAN Tianyu, et al. Multi-scale and detail-enhanced segment anything model for salient object detection[C]. The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Melbourne, Australia, 2024: 9894–9903. doi: 10.1145/3664647.3680650.
    [3] LIU Zhengyi, DENG Sheng, WANG Xinrui, et al. SSFam: Scribble supervised salient object detection family[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2025, 27: 1988–2000. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2025.3543092.
    [4] WEI Jun, WANG Shuhui, WU Zhe, et al. Label decoupling framework for salient object detection[C]. The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, USA, 2020: 13022–13031. doi: 10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.01304.
    [5] LIU Nian, ZHANG Ni, WAN Kaiyuan, et al. Visual saliency transformer[C]. The IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, Canada, 2021: 4702–4712. doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00468.
    [6] LI Gongyang, BAI Zhen, LIU Zhi, et al. Salient object detection in optical remote sensing images driven by transformer[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2023, 32: 5257–5269. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2023.3314285.
    [7] ZHU Jiayi, QIN Xuebin, and ELSADDIK A. DC-Net: Divide-and-conquer for salient object detection[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2025, 157: 110903. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110903.
    [8] XIE Chenxi, XIA Changqun, MA Mingcan, et al. Pyramid grafting network for one-stage high resolution saliency detection[C]. The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, USA, 2022: 11707–11716. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01142.
    [9] MA Mingcan, XIA Changqun, XIE Chenxi, et al. Boosting broader receptive fields for salient object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2023, 32: 1026–1038. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2022.3232209.
    [10] KIRILLOV A, MINTUN E, RAVI N, et al. Segment anything[C]. The IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Paris, France, 2023: 3992–4003. doi: 10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00371.
    [11] HOULSBY N, GIURGIU A, JASTRZEBSKI S, et al. Parameter-efficient transfer learning for NLP[C]. The 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, Long Beach, USA, 2019: 2790–2799.
    [12] HU E, Shen Yelong, WALLIS P, et al. LoRA: Low-rank adaptation of large language models[C]. 10th International Conference on Learning Representations, OpenReview. net, 2022.
    [13] ZHENG Linghao, PU Xinyang, ZHANG Su, et al. Tuning a SAM-based model with multicognitive visual adapter to remote sensing instance segmentation[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2025, 18: 2737–2748. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3504409.
    [14] LI Jia, SU Jinming, XIA Changqun, et al. Distortion-adaptive salient object detection in 360° omnidirectional images[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2020, 14(1): 38–48. doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2019.2957982.
    [15] MA Guangxiao, LI Shuai, CHEN Chenglizhao, et al. Stage-wise salient object detection in 360° omnidirectional image via object-level semantical saliency ranking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2020, 26(12): 3535–3545. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3023636.
    [16] WEN Hongfa, ZHU Zunjie, ZHOU Xiaofei, et al. Consistency perception network for 360° omnidirectional salient object detection[J]. Neurocomputing, 2025, 620: 129243. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129243.
    [17] ZHANG Yi, HAMIDOUCHE W, and DEFORGES O. Channel-spatial mutual attention network for 360° salient object detection[C]. 2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Montreal, Canada, 2022: 3436–3442. doi: 10.1109/ICPR56361.2022.9956354.
    [18] HUANG Mengke, LIU Zhi, LI Gongyang, et al. FANet: Features adaptation network for 360° omnidirectional salient object detection[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2020, 27: 1819–1823. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2020.3028192.
    [19] CONG Runmin, HUANG Ke, LEI Jianjun, et al. Multi-projection fusion and refinement network for salient object detection in 360° omnidirectional image[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2024, 35(7): 9495–9507. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3233883.
    [20] ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Qiudan, SHEN Xuelin, et al. Salient object detection on 360° omnidirectional image with bi-branch hybrid projection network[C]. 2023 IEEE 25th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), Poitiers, France, 2023: 1–5. doi: 10.1109/MMSP59012.2023.10337695.
    [21] HE Zhentao, SHAO Feng, CHEN Gang, et al. SCFANet: Semantics and context feature aggregation network for 360° salient object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2024, 26: 2276–2288. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2023.3293994.
    [22] HE Zhentao, SHAO Feng, XIE Zhengxuan, et al. SIHENet: Semantic interaction and hierarchical embedding network for 360° salient object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2025, 74: 5003815. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2024.3507047.
    [23] HUANG Mengke, LI Gongyang, LIU Zhi, et al. Lightweight distortion-aware network for salient object detection in omnidirectional images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2023, 33(10): 6191–6197. doi: 10.1109/TCSVT.2023.3253685.
    [24] ZHAO Yinjie, ZHAO Lichen, YU Qian, et al. Distortion-aware transformer in 360° salient object detection[C]. The 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Ottawa, Canada, 2023: 499–508. doi: 10.1145/3581783.3612025.
    [25] 陈晓雷, 张学功, 杜泽龙, 等. 面向360°全景图像显著目标检测的畸变语义聚合网络[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2025, 30(7): 2451–2467. doi: 10.11834/jig.240371.

    CHEN Xiaolei, ZHANG Xuegong, DU Zelong, et al. Distortion semantic aggregation network for salient object detection in 360° omnidirectional images[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2025, 30(7): 2451–2467. doi: 10.11834/jig.240371.
    [26] 陈晓雷, 杜泽龙, 张学功, 等. 畸变自适应与位置感知的360°全景图像显著目标检测网络[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2025, 30(8): 2758–2774. doi: 10.11834/jig.240592.

    CHEN Xiaolei, DU Zelong, ZHANG Xuegong, et al. Distortion-adaptive and position-aware network for salient object detection in 360° omnidirectional image[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2025, 30(8): 2758–2774. doi: 10.11834/jig.240592.
    [27] WU Junjie, XIA Changqun, YU Tianshu, et al. View-aware salient object detection for 360° omnidirectional image[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2023, 25: 6471–6484. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2022.3209015.
    [28] DAI Haowei, BAO Liuxin, SHEN Kunye, et al. 360° omnidirectional salient object detection with multi-scale interaction and densely-connected prediction[C]. 12th International Conference on Image and Graphics, Nanjing, China, 2023: 427–438. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-46305-1_35.
    [29] CHEN Gang, SHAO Feng, CHAI Xiongli, et al. Multi-stage salient object detection in 360° omnidirectional image using complementary object-level semantic information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence, 2024, 8(1): 776–789. doi: 10.1109/TETCI.2023.3259433.
    [30] 陈晓雷, 王兴, 张学功, 等. 面向360度全景图像显著目标检测的相邻协调网络[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(12): 4529–4541. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240502.

    CHEN Xiaolei, WANG Xing, ZHANG Xuegong, et al. Adjacent coordination network for salient object detection in 360 degree omnidirectional images[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(12): 4529–4541. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240502.
    [31] YUN I, SHIN C, LEE H, et al. EGformer: Equirectangular geometry-biased transformer for 360 depth estimation[C]. The IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Paris, France, 2023: 6078–6089. doi: 10.1109/ICCV51070.2023.00561.
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  914
  • HTML全文浏览量:  426
  • PDF下载量:  130
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-11-26
  • 修回日期:  2026-01-24
  • 录用日期:  2026-01-26
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-02-12
  • 刊出日期:  2026-05-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回