Auxiliary Screening for HCM with HFpEF Utilizing Smartphone-Acquired Heart Sound Analysis
-
摘要: 射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)是一种高度异质性的临床综合征,在肥厚型心肌病患者(HCM)中较为常见。由于其诊断流程复杂,开展初步筛查与早期识别具有重要意义。对此,该文基于患者智能手机所采集的心音信号,提取了梅尔频率倒谱系数和短时傅里叶变换时频谱特征,并基于此分别构建了支持向量机与卷积神经网络两个基分类器。随后将两者预测概率作为新特征,构建并训练了以逻辑回归为元分类器的集成学习模型,用于HCM合并HFpEF的识别。结果显示,集成模型在测试集的AUC达到了0.900,准确率、灵敏度和特异度分别达到了0.813、0.768和0.854,有效提升了预测性能。结果表明,该文设计的分类模型可以基于智能手机采集的心音实现HCM合并HFpEF的高效识别,有望用于HCM患者对自身病情的动态监测和HFpEF初步筛查,从而缩短诊断延迟。
-
关键词:
- 心音信号分析 /
- 人工智能 /
- 肥厚型心肌病 /
- 射血分数保留的心力衰竭 /
- 辅助筛查
Abstract:Objective Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is highly prevalent in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and its early identification is critical for improving disease management. However, early screening of HFpEF is challenging due to non-specific symptoms, complex diagnostic procedures, and high follow-up costs. Smartphones, with their wide accessibility, low cost, and portability, offer a feasible approach for assisting cardiac sound-based screening. This study utilizes smartphone-recorded heart sounds from HCM patients to develop and train an ensemble learning classification model, aiming to achieve early detection and dynamic self-monitoring of HFpEF in the HCM population. Methods The proposed HFpEF screening framework consists of three main components: preprocessing, feature extraction, and model training and fusion (ensemble learning) ( Fig. 1 ). In the preprocessing stage, heart sounds collected via smartphones undergo bandpass filtering and wavelet denoising to ensure signal quality, followed by segmentation into individual cardiac cycles. During feature extraction, Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs) and short-time Fourier transform (STFT) time-frequency spectra are computed (Fig. 3 ). For classification, a Stacking ensemble strategy is adopted: base learners including a support vector machine (SVM) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) are trained, and their predicted probabilities are combined to form a new feature space. A logistic regression (LR) meta learner is then trained on these features to identify HFpEF in HCM patients.Results and Discussions The classification results of the three models on the same patient-level independent test set are as follows. The SVM base learner achieved an AUC of 0.800, with an accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.766, 0.659, and 0.865, respectively ( Table 5 ). The CNN base learner attained an AUC of 0.850, with corresponding metrics of 0.789, 0.622, and 0.944 (Table 5 ). In contrast, the ensemble-based LR classifier demonstrated superior performance, reaching an AUC of 0.900, with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.813, 0.768, and 0.854, respectively (Table 5 ). Compared to the base learners, the ensemble model shows significantly improved overall performance after probability-based feature fusion (Fig. 5 ). When compared to existing clinical HFpEF risk scores, the proposed method exhibits superior predictive performance and stronger dynamic monitoring capability, making it particularly suitable for risk stratification and follow-up warning in home settings. Relative to professional heart sound acquisition devices, the smartphone-based approach offers greater accessibility and cost-effectiveness, proving more applicable for auxiliary HFpEF screening in high-risk HCM populations.Conclusions This study addresses the challenges in clinical screening of HFpEF in HCM patients by proposing a smartphone-based heart sound acquisition system combined with an ensemble learning prediction model, resulting in a highly accessible and easily implementable auxiliary screening pipeline. This work is the first to validate the effectiveness of a smartphone-based heart sound analysis method and its feasibility for initial HFpEF screening in HCM patients. It has the potential to serve as an economical auxiliary tool for early HFpEF detection, providing a non-invasive, convenient, and efficient screening strategy for HCM patients with comorbid HFpEF. -
表 1 被纳入HCM患者群体的基本信息和临床特征
患者类别 数量 年龄(岁) 心率(bpm) LVEF(%) E/e’ 不患HFpEF 27 40 ± 17 73.5 ± 16.6 66.5 ± 7.2 7.4 ± 2.3 患有HFpEF 29 52 ± 15 67.8 ± 9.7 73.8 ± 7.2 12.9 ± 5.0 表 2 SVM分类器数据集划分详情
类别 训练集 测试集 患者数 音频数 患者数 音频数 患有HFpEF 24 337 5 82 不患HFpEF 22 333 5 89 合计 46 670 10 171 表 3 卷积块的具体结构细节
网络层 序号 结构组成 核大小 核数量 步长 参数量 输出大小 卷积块1 1 1维卷积 5 64 1 20544 ×1 2 批标准化 – – – 128 ×1 3 ReLU – – – – ×1 卷积块2 4 1维卷积 5 64 1 20544 ×1 5 批标准化 – – – 128 ×1 6 ReLU – – – – ×1 卷积块3 7 1维卷积 5 64 1 20544 ×1 8 批标准化 – – – 128 ×1 9 ReLU – – – – ×1 卷积块4 10 1维卷积 5 64 2 20544 ×0.5 11 批标准化 – – – 128 ×0.5 12 ReLU – – – – ×0.5 表 4 CNN分类器数据集划分详情
类别 训练集 验证集 测试集 患者数 音频数 患者数 音频数 患者数 音频数 患有HFpEF 18 254 6 83 5 82 不患HFpEF 17 253 5 80 5 89 合计 35 506 11 164 10 171 表 5 不同模型在测试集的预测性能(%)对比
分类模型 AUC ACC SEN SPE SVM 0.800 0.766 0.659 0.865 CNN 0.850 0.789 0.622 0.944 集成模型 0.900 0.813 0.768 0.854 -
[1] ZHAO Mengya, HE Xianzhen, MIN Xinwen, et al. Recent clinical updates of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and future therapeutic strategies[J]. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2025, 26(2): 25132. doi: 10.31083/RCM25132. [2] KRITTANAWONG C, BRITT W M, RIZWAN A, et al. Clinical update in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction[J]. Current Heart Failure Reports, 2024, 21(5): 461–484. doi: 10.1007/s11897-024-00679-5. [3] LIU Jie, WANG Dong, RUAN Jieyun, et al. Identification of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction helps risk stratification for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy[J]. BMC Medicine, 2022, 20(1): 21. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02219-7. [4] CHEN Qinfen, HU Jiandong, HU Jie, et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction[J]. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2024, 113(5): 761–769. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02371-5. [5] YANG Yang, GUO Xingming, WANG Hui, et al. Deep learning-based heart sound analysis for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction diagnosis[J]. Diagnostics, 2021, 11(12): 2349. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122349. [6] HUIS IN ’T VELD A E, DE MAN F S, VAN ROSSUM A C, et al. How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The value of invasive stress testing[J]. Netherlands Heart Journal, 2016, 24(4): 244–251. doi: 10.1007/s12471-016-0811-0. [7] MICHAUD M, MAURIN V, SIMON M, et al. Patients with high left ventricular filling pressure may be missed applying 2016 echo guidelines: A pilot study[J]. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2019, 35(12): 2157–2166. doi: 10.1007/s10554-019-01667-w. [8] BANTHIYA S, CHECK L, and ATKINS J. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy as a form of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Diagnosis, drugs, and procedures[J]. US Cardiology Review, 2024, 18: e17. doi: 10.15420/usc.2023.21. [9] 中华医学会心血管病学分会, 中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会, 中国医师协会心力衰竭专业委员会, 等. 中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2024[J]. 中华心血管病杂志, 2024, 52(3): 235–275. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231101-00405.Chinese Society of Cardiology, Chinese Medical Association, Chinese College of Cardiovascular Physician, Chinese Heart Failure Association of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, et al. Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of heart failure 2024[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiology, 2024, 52(3): 235–275. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231101-00405. [10] CAMPBELL P, RUTTEN F H, LEE M M, et al. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Everything the clinician needs to know[J]. The Lancet, 2024, 403(10431): 1083–1092. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02756-3. [11] GHARAGOZLOO K, MEHDIZADEH M, HECKMAN G, et al. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the elderly population: Basic mechanisms and clinical considerations[J]. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 2024, 40(8): 1424–1444. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.04.006. [12] LUO Hongxing, WEERTS J, BEKKERS A, et al. Association between phonocardiography and echocardiography in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction[J]. European Heart Journal - Digital Health, 2023, 4(1): 4–11. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac073. [13] ALTSTIDL J M, ALTSTIDL T R, ANNEKEN L, et al. Detection of aortic stenosis using built-in microphones of commercially available smartphones[J]. European Heart Journal, 2023, 44(S2): ehad655.2983. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.2983. [14] REN Huiying, QIN Qirong, DONG Quanbin, et al. Smartphone-measured heart sounds for atrial fibrillation screening in community populations[J]. Circulation, 2025, 152(4): 283–285. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.073828. [15] KANG S H, JOE B, YOON Y, et al. Cardiac auscultation using smartphones: Pilot study[J]. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018, 6(2): e49. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8946. [16] LUO Hongxing, LAMATA P, BAZIN S, et al. Smartphone as an electronic stethoscope: Factors influencing heart sound quality[J]. European Heart Journal - Digital Health, 2022, 3(3): 473–480. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac044. [17] LI Yun, ZHAO Zhanjiang, AINIWAER A, et al. Smartphone for heart sound measurement in hospital: Feasibility and influencing factors[J]. European Heart Journal - Digital Health, 2025, 6(3): 486–495. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf007. [18] GARDEZI S K M, MYERSON S G, CHAMBERS J, et al. Cardiac auscultation poorly predicts the presence of valvular heart disease in asymptomatic primary care patients[J]. Heart, 2018, 104(22): 1832–1835. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313082. [19] CHOU J C, YEH C C, and LEE H Y. One-shot voice conversion by separating speaker and content representations with instance normalization[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1904.05742, 2019. (查阅网上资料, 不确定文献类型及格式是否正确, 请确认). [20] MIENYE I D and SUN Yanxia. A survey of ensemble learning: Concepts, algorithms, applications, and prospects[J]. IEEE Access, 2022, 10: 99129–99149. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3207287. [21] 射血分数保留的心力衰竭诊断与治疗中国专家共识制定工作组. 射血分数保留的心力衰竭诊断与治疗中国专家共识2023[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2023, 38(4): 375–393. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2023.04.001.Chinese Expert Consensus Working Group on Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction. Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Chinese expert consensus 2023[J]. Chinese Circulation Journal, 2023, 38(4): 375–393. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2023.04.001. [22] PAULUS W J. H2FPEF score: At last, a properly validated diagnostic algorithm for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction[J]. Circulation, 2018, 138(9): 871–873. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035711. [23] PIESKE B, TSCHÖPE C, DE BOER R A, et al. How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: A consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. European Heart Journal, 2019, 40(40): 3297–3317. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641. [24] 贾晓艳, 刘离香, 王东伟, 等. H2FPEF和HFA-PEFF评分在我国射血分数保留心力衰竭及射血分数保留心力衰竭合并心房颤动患者中的适用性分析[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2024, 46(2): 154–160. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15826.JIA Xiaoyan, LIU Lixiang, WANG Dongwei, et al. Applicability of H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores in Chinese patients suffering from heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction complicated with atrial fibrillation[J]. Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae, 2024, 46(2): 154–160. doi: 10.3881/j.issn.1000-503X.15826. [25] AKERMAN A P, AL-ROUB N, ANGELL-JAMES C, et al. External validation of artificial intelligence for detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction[J]. Nature Communications, 2025, 16(1): 2915. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58283-7. [26] REDDY Y N V, CARTER R E, SUNDARAM V, et al. An evidence-based screening tool for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The HFpEF-ABA score[J]. Nature Medicine, 2024, 30(8): 2258–2264. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03140-1. [27] LAENENS D, ZEGKOS T, KAMPERIDIS V, et al. Heart failure risk assessment in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy based on the H2FPEF score[J]. European Journal of Heart Failure, 2024, 26(10): 2173–2182. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3413. [28] GAO Yipeng, LIU Hongyun, BI Xiaojun, et al. H2FPEF and HFA-PEFF scores for heart failure risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients[J]. ESC Heart Failure, 2025, 12(3): 2225–2238. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.15247. [29] LIU Yongmin, GUO Xingming, and ZHENG Yineng. An automatic approach using ELM classifier for HFpEF identification based on heart sound characteristics[J]. Journal of Medical Systems, 2019, 43(9): 285. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1415-1. [30] ZHENG Yineng, GUO Xingming, YANG Yang, et al. Phonocardiogram transfer learning-based CatBoost model for diastolic dysfunction identification using multiple domain-specific deep feature fusion[J]. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 2023, 156: 106707. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106707. [31] ZHAO Qinghao, GENG Shijia, WANG Boya, et al. Deep learning in heart sound analysis: From techniques to clinical applications[J]. Health Data Science, 2024, 4: 0182. doi: 10.34133/hds.0182. -
下载:
下载: