高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

混响室条件下线缆共模干扰临界辐射干扰场强测试研究

胡德洲 魏光辉 潘晓东 卢新福

胡德洲, 魏光辉, 潘晓东, 卢新福. 混响室条件下线缆共模干扰临界辐射干扰场强测试研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(4): 837-844. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180328
引用本文: 胡德洲, 魏光辉, 潘晓东, 卢新福. 混响室条件下线缆共模干扰临界辐射干扰场强测试研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(4): 837-844. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180328
Dezhou HU, Guanghui WEI, Xiaodong PAN, Xinfu LU. Investigation on the Radiated Interference E-field Threshold Testing for Common-mode Interference of Transmission Lines in Reverberation Chambers[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2019, 41(4): 837-844. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180328
Citation: Dezhou HU, Guanghui WEI, Xiaodong PAN, Xinfu LU. Investigation on the Radiated Interference E-field Threshold Testing for Common-mode Interference of Transmission Lines in Reverberation Chambers[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2019, 41(4): 837-844. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180328

混响室条件下线缆共模干扰临界辐射干扰场强测试研究

doi: 10.11999/JEIT180328
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(61372040)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    胡德洲:男,1990年生,博士生,研究方向为电磁环境效应试验评估技术

    魏光辉:男,1964年生,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为电磁兼容与防护技术

    潘晓东:男,1980年生,讲师,博士,研究方向为电磁兼容与防护技术

    卢新福:男,1988年生,博士,研究方向为电磁环境效应试验评估技术

    通讯作者:

    胡德洲 hdz199075@sina.cn

  • 中图分类号: TN06

Investigation on the Radiated Interference E-field Threshold Testing for Common-mode Interference of Transmission Lines in Reverberation Chambers

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61372040)
  • 摘要:

    为在混响室中线缆共模干扰时的设备(EUT)进行临界辐射干扰场强测试,并确保与开阔场中测试结果一致,该文推导了线缆上共模电流满足的方程,将共模电流分解为相应的特征电流,计算了终端负载任意时线缆最大方向性系数的变化范围。以单导体传输线和同轴线为EUT,分别在混响室和开阔场中测试线缆的临界干扰场强,对计算结果进行了验证。结果表明:最大方向性系数的计算结果可以保证两种不同场地中测试结果的一致性,双线的共模干扰以及同轴线均可以等效为单线,且线缆弯曲对测试结果基本没有影响。

  • 图  1  共模干扰特征电流

    图  2  特征电流辐射场

    图  3  双导体传输线共模干扰时Dmax的范围

    图  4  单线Dmax的范围

    图  5  PWs关系示意图

    图  6  混响室与开阔场临界场强比较

    图  7  直线和弯线接收功率平均值比较

    图  8  混响室与开阔场临界场强比较(同轴线)

    表  1  混响室中参数计算结果(单线)

    f
    (GHz)
    Dmax, hDmax, l$\sigma $
    (V·m–1)
    Ws
    (dBm)
    Esh
    (V·m–1)
    Esl
    (V·m–1)
    0.152.721.285.7317.769.868.95
    0.202.861.336.6020.6011.3210.55
    0.253.361.645.0115.0610.018.71
    0.304.061.856.5915.5411.789.85
    0.354.181.894.3814.679.797.61
    0.404.682.294.6810.386.685.25
    0.455.302.285.4010.777.996.63
    0.505.342.435.899.709.027.65
    0.555.862.776.7612.1510.368.77
    0.606.432.825.8411.318.307.09
    0.656.383.015.769.787.516.04
    0.706.943.117.1310.738.176.30
    0.757.483.067.4111.838.356.56
    2.6016.498.169.46–10.73.442.75
    2.7017.387.445.42–6.564.733.99
    2.8018.097.389.30–3.167.536.08
    2.9017.758.6310.34–2.207.385.71
    3.0018.568.168.91–5.727.045.84
    3.1019.408.0110.53–4.968.837.32
    3.2018.979.1610.55–5.087.606.02
    3.3019.798.5010.76–9.747.715.94
    3.4020.708.609.15–9.057.266.07
    3.5020.129.577.98–12.656.235.08
    3.6020.879.107.38–10.994.973.81
    3.7021.899.0311.16–1.897.956.41
    3.8021.3410.128.15–6.186.355.32
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  混响室中参数计算结果(同轴线)

    f (GHz)Dmax, hDmax, l$\sigma $ (V·m–1)Ws (dBm)Esh (V·m–1)Esl (V·m–1)
    2.616.857.0118.07–50.8215.009.67
    2.716.497.8921.06–52.0016.4811.40
    2.817.267.5917.18–52.5013.709.09
    2.917.987.6719.97–55.8815.8410.35
    3.017.648.9516.93–55.0112.438.85
    3.118.547.7813.18–55.5010.386.72
    3.219.088.0914.60–53.2011.287.34
    3.318.759.2515.23–54.4011.007.73
    3.420.018.2614.32–57.2910.957.03
    3.520.148.6113.95–56.8310.456.83
    3.619.869.4611.41–54.438.155.63
    3.721.169.0312.54–43.859.175.99
    3.821.049.5213.97–47.089.956.69
    下载: 导出CSV
  • AMADOR E, KRAUTHAUSER H G, and BESNIER P. A binomial model for radiated immunity measurements[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2013, 55(4): 683–691 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2012.2231942
    SELEMANI K, RICHALOT E, LEGRAND O, et al. Energy localization effects within a reverberation chamber and their reduction in chaotic geometries[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2017, 59(2): 325–333 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2016.2617322
    ARNAUT L R, MOGLIE F, BASTIANELLI L, et al. Helical stirring for enhanced low-frequency performance of reverberation chambers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2017, 59(4): 1016–1026 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2016.2641386
    MIGLIACCIO M, GIL J J, SORRENTINO A, et al. The polarization purity of the electromagnetic field in a reverberating chamber[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2016, 58(3): 694–700 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2016.2528503
    MONSEF f, SERRA R, and COAAZ A. Goodness-of-fit tests in reverberation chambers: Is sample independence necessary?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2015, 57(6): 1748–1751 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2015.2451211
    GJB151B-2013: 军用设备和分系统电磁发射和敏感度要求与测量[S]. 国军标2013.

    GJB151B-2013: Electromagnetic emission and susceptibility requirements and measurements[S]. China Military Standard 2013.
    IEC 61000-4-21: ElectroMagnetic Compatibility (EMC)-Part4-21: Testing and measurement techniques-reverberation chamber test methods[S]. IEC Standard 2008.
    贾锐, 王庆国, 王树峤, 等. 混响室条件下辐射敏感度表征方法研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2016, 36(1): 100–104

    JIA Rui, WANG Qingguo, WANG Shuqiao, et al. Research on the characterization of susceptibility threshold in reverberation chamber[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016, 36(1): 100–104
    熊久良, 刘心愿. 基于位置替代法的无线电引信混响室敏感度测试方法[J]. 高电压技术, 2015, 41(1): 320–326 doi: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.2015.01.045

    XIONG Jiuliang and LIU Xinyuan. Susceptibility test method of radio fuze in reverberation chamber based on position substitution method[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2015, 41(1): 320–326 doi: 10.13336/j.1003-6520.hve.2015.01.045
    AMADOR E, MIRY C, and BOUYGE N. Compatible susceptibility measurements in fully anechoic room and reverberation chamber[C]. Proceeding of the 2014 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC Europe 2014). Gothenburg, Sweden, 2014: 860–865.
    HU Dezhou, WEI Guanghui, PAN Xiaodong, et al. Investigation of the radiation immunity testing method in reverberation chamber[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2017, 59(6): 1791–1797 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2017.2698141
    WILSON P F, HILL D A, and HOLLOWAY C L. On Determining the Maximum Emissions From Electrically Large Sources[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2002, 41(1): 79–86.
    HILL D A, CAMELL D G, CABCEY K H, et al. Radiated emissions and immunity of microstrip transmission lines: theory and reverberation chamber measurements[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1996, 38(2): 165–172 doi: 10.1109/15.494619
    孙铁雷, 林程, 曹万科. 带有屏蔽线缆的电动车辆动力系统共模模型与预测[J]. 电工技术学报, 2012, 27(2): 128–132

    SUN Tielei, LIN Cheng, and CAO Wanke. Common mode prediction oncable shielded drive system in electric vehicle[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2012, 27(2): 128–132
    林福昌, 姚宗干, 代新, 等. 屏蔽电缆共模感应干扰的数值计算方法[J]. 高电压技术, 1997, 23(4): 9–11

    LIN Fuchang, YAO Zonggan, DAI Xin, et al. Numerical calculation of common-model interference coupled in a shielded cable[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 1997, 23(4): 9–11
    MAGDOWSKI M and VICK R. Closed-form formulas for the stochastic electromagnetic field coupling to a transmission line with arbitrary loads[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2012, 54(5): 1147–1152 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2012.2193130
    MAGDOWSKI M, TKACHENKO S V, and VICK R. Coupling of stochastic electromagnetic fields to a transmission line in a reverberation chamber[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2011, 53(2): 308–317 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2010.2097267
    CERRI G, LEO D, MOGLIE F, et al. Theoretical and experimental analysis of the field-to-line coupling in a reverberation chamber[J]. IEEE Proceedings: Science, Measurement and Technology, 2006, 153(6): 201–207 doi: 10.1049/ip-smt:20060014
    VUKICEVIC A, RACHIDI F, RUBINSTEIN M, et al. On the evaluation of antenna-mode currents along transmission lines[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2006, 48(4): 693–700 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2006.884511
    HE Z, ZHA L P, and CHEN R S. Efficient analysis of EM scattering by using higher-order hierarchical linear-liear basis functions[J]. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2016, 15: 305–308 doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2015.2442616
    GU Jihong, DING Dazhi, HE Zi, et al. A low frequency EFIE-MLFMA solver based on approximate diagonalization of the Green’s function[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2017, 65(12): 7150–7156 doi: 10.1109/TAP.2017.2759786
    CHEN Shitao, ZHANG Tiancheng, DING Dazhi, et al. EMI analysis of field-line-circuit coupling model based on time domain integral equation method[C]. IEEE Electrical Design Of Advanced Packing & System (EDAPS) Symposium, Hang Zhou, China, 2017.
    LUGRIN G, TKACHENKO S V, RACHIDI F, et al. High-Frequency electromagnetic coupling to multiconductor transmission lines of finite length[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2015, 57(6): 1714–1723 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2015.2475156
    吕琪. 不适定问题的迭代正则化方法研究[D]. [硕士论文], 武汉理工大学, 2012.

    LUE Qi. The research of iterative regularization methods for ill-posed[D]. [Master dissertation], Wuhan University of Technology, 2012.
    赵占山. 结构故障诊断的几种方法[D]. [硕士论文], 哈尔滨工业大学, 2006.

    ZHAO Zhanshan. Several identification method on the structure fault diagnosis[D]. [Master dissertation], Harbin Institute of Technology, 2006.
    MENG J, TEO Y X, THOMAS, D W P, et al. Fast prediction of transmission line radiated emissions using the hertzian dipole method and line-end discontinuity models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2014, 56(6): 1295–1303 doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2014.2318720
    HILL D A. Plane wave integral representation for fields in reverberation chambers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1998, 40(3): 209–217 doi: 10.1109/15.709418
  • 加载中
图(8) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1797
  • HTML全文浏览量:  713
  • PDF下载量:  53
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2018-04-11
  • 修回日期:  2018-12-13
  • 网络出版日期:  2018-12-20
  • 刊出日期:  2019-04-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回