高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

一种集成直觉模糊信息的激励自适应信任模型

徐军 钟元生 万树平

徐军, 钟元生, 万树平. 一种集成直觉模糊信息的激励自适应信任模型[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(4): 803-810. doi: 10.11999/JEIT150750
引用本文: 徐军, 钟元生, 万树平. 一种集成直觉模糊信息的激励自适应信任模型[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(4): 803-810. doi: 10.11999/JEIT150750
XU Jun, ZHONG Yuansheng, WAN Shuping. Incentive Adaptive Trust Model Based on Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2016, 38(4): 803-810. doi: 10.11999/JEIT150750
Citation: XU Jun, ZHONG Yuansheng, WAN Shuping. Incentive Adaptive Trust Model Based on Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2016, 38(4): 803-810. doi: 10.11999/JEIT150750

一种集成直觉模糊信息的激励自适应信任模型

doi: 10.11999/JEIT150750
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金(71361012, 61263018),江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ15267),江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目(JC1338),江西财经大学青年基金

Incentive Adaptive Trust Model Based on Integrated Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information

Funds: 

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (71361012, 61263018), The Science and Technology Project of Jiangxi province educational department of China (GJJ151601), The Colleges Humanities Social Science Research Project of Jiangxi Province (JC1338), The Young Foundation of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics

  • 摘要: 针对现有信任机制不能很好表达信任的不确定性,且缺乏有效处理分布式网络中存在的不诚实推荐和策略性欺骗等问题,该文提出一种集成直觉模糊信息的自适应信任评估模型。为了激励提供可信服务的实体,惩罚不良行为实体,该模型结合服务持续性强度和时间衰减因子,计算实体直接信任直觉模糊数。同时利用实体的推荐可信度和行为一致性过滤不诚实推荐行为。除此之外,为了克服综合信任聚合计算中权重确定较主观的问题,给出了一种新的自适应权重分配方法。仿真实验表明,该模型在提高实体服务积极性和抑制恶意欺诈行为中,都有较好的适应性和有效性。
  • 徐海湄, 齐守青, 卢显良, 等. 一种新的基于概率统计论的P2P网络信任模型[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2011, 33(6): 1314-1318. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2010.00179.
    XU H M, QI S Q, LU X L, et al. A novel trust model of P2P networks based on theory of probability and statistics[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2011, 33(6): 1314-1318. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2010.00179.
    KAMVAR S D, SCHLOSSER M T, and GARCIA-MOLINA H. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks[C]. Proceedings of 12th International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, 2003: 640-651.
    TEACY W T, LUCK M, ROGERS A, et al. An efficient and versatile approach to trust and reputation using hierarchical bayesian modeling[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2012, 193: 149-185.
    张绍武, 林鸿飞, 刘晓霞, 等. 基于概率的信任传播模型[J]. 计算机科学, 2014, 41(8): 90-93.
    ZHANG S W, LIN H F, LIU X X, et al. Trust propagation based on probability[J]. Computer Science, 2014, 41(8): 90-93.
    CERUTTI F, TONIOLO A, OREN N, et al. Subjective logic operators in trust assessment: an empirical study[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2015, 17(4): 743-762.
    田俊峰, 吴丽娟. 基于多项式主观逻辑的扩展信任传播模型[J]. 通信学报, 2013, 34(5): 12-19.
    TIAN J F and WU L J. Multinomial subjective logic based extended trust propagation model[J]. Journal on Communications, 2013, 34(5): 12-19.
    LIU G, YANG Q, WANG H, et al. Assessment of Multi-hop interpersonal trust in social networks by three-valued subjective logic[C]. IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, Shanghai, 2014: 1698-1706.
    李致远, 王汝传. P2P电子商务环境下的动态安全信任管理模型[J]. 通信学报, 2011, 32(3): 50-59.
    LI Z Y and WANG R C. Dynamic secure trust management model for P2P e-commerce environments[J]. Journal on Communications, 2011, 32(3): 50-59.
    徐晓斌, 张光卫, 王尚广, 等. 基于轻量云模型的WSN不确定性信任表示方法[J]. 通信学报, 2014, 35(2): 63-69.
    XU X B, ZHANG G W, WANG S G, et al. Representation for uncertainty trust of WSN based on lightweight-cloud[J]. Journal on Communications, 2014, 35(2): 63-69.
    YU B and SINGH M P. An evidential model of distributed reputation management[C]. Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems: Part 1. Bologna, 2002: 294-301.
    田春岐, 邹仕洪, 王文东, 等. 一种新的基于改进型DS证据理论的P2P信任模型[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2008, 30(6): 1480-1484.
    TIAN C Q, ZOU S H, WANG W D, et al. A new trust based on advance D-S evidence theory for P2P networks[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2008, 30(6): 1480-1484.
    蒋黎明, 张宏, 张琨, 等. 开放系统中一种基于模糊修正的证据信任模型[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2011, 33(8): 1930-1936. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2011.00063.
    JIANG L M, ZHANG H, ZHANG K, et al. An evidential trust model with fuzzy adjustment method for open systems[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2011, 33(8): 1930-1936. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2011.00063.
    JIANG L, XU J, ZHANG K, et al. A new evidential trust model for open distributed systems[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3): 3772-3782.
    XU Z and CAI X. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012: 4-16.
    雷英杰, 赵杰, 路艳丽, 等. 直觉模糊集理论及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 90-95.
    LEI Y J, ZHAO J, LU Y L, et al. Theory and Application of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014: 90-95.
    韩祺祎, 任梦吟, 文红. 基于拓扑势的P2P社区推荐信任模型[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37(6):?1279-1284. doi: 10.11999/ JEIT141303.
    HAN Q Y, REN M Y, and WEN H. Topological potential based recommendation trust model for P2P communities system[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2015, 37(6): 1279-1284. doi: 10.11999/JEIT141303.
    YUE Z. Aggregating crisp values into intuitionistic fuzzy number for group decision making[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2014, 38(11): 2969-2982.
    TZENG G H and HUANG J J. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications[M]. Florida: CRC Press, 2011: 342-366.
    吴大鹏, 冯誉, 王汝言, 等. 恶意节点容忍的间断连接无线网络消息转发策略[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37(7): 1591-1597. doi: 10.11999/JEIT141198.
    WU D P, FENG Y, WANG R Y, et al. Malicious node tolerant packet forwarding mechanism for intermittently connected wireless network[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2015, 37(7): 1591-1597. doi: 10.11999/JEIT141198.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1537
  • HTML全文浏览量:  165
  • PDF下载量:  385
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-06-24
  • 修回日期:  2015-12-18
  • 刊出日期:  2016-04-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回