高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于视觉显著失真度的图像质量自适应评价方法

丰明坤 赵生妹 邢超

丰明坤, 赵生妹, 邢超. 基于视觉显著失真度的图像质量自适应评价方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37(9): 2062-2068. doi: 10.11999/JEIT141641
引用本文: 丰明坤, 赵生妹, 邢超. 基于视觉显著失真度的图像质量自适应评价方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37(9): 2062-2068. doi: 10.11999/JEIT141641
Feng Ming-kun, Zhao Sheng-mei, Xing Chao. Image Quality Self-adaptive Assessment Based on Visual Salience Distortion[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2015, 37(9): 2062-2068. doi: 10.11999/JEIT141641
Citation: Feng Ming-kun, Zhao Sheng-mei, Xing Chao. Image Quality Self-adaptive Assessment Based on Visual Salience Distortion[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2015, 37(9): 2062-2068. doi: 10.11999/JEIT141641

基于视觉显著失真度的图像质量自适应评价方法

doi: 10.11999/JEIT141641

Image Quality Self-adaptive Assessment Based on Visual Salience Distortion

  • 摘要: 针对结构相似(SSIM)图像质量评价算法没有考虑人眼视觉多通道性和对图像高失真评价的不稳定性,提出一种基于视觉显著失真度的图像质量自适应融合(VSAP)评价方法。该方法首先采用log-Gabor滤波提取图像的高频、中频及低频3层视觉特征,基于log-Gabor变换尺度和方向权重系数计算特征值的相似度;然后基于视觉阈值多分辨性迭加计算出特征值的失真度;最后,根据视觉失真度自适应融合相似度评价与失真度评价获得图像质量的最终客观评价。实验结果表明,VSAP方法不但对图像不同类型失真的客观评价与主观感知具有更高的相关性,而且3个主要指标斯皮尔曼等级相关系数(SROCC)、曲线拟合相关系数(CC)和均方根误差(RMSE)对图像不同水平失真的整体评价性能更稳定,明显优于其它评价方法。
  • 蒋刚毅, 黄大江, 王旭, 等. 图像质量评价方法研究进展[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2010, 32(1): 219-226.
    Jiang Gang-yi, Huang Da-jiang, Wang Xu, et al.. Overview on image quality assessment methods[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2010, 32(1): 219-226.
    张飞艳, 谢伟, 陈荣元, 等. 基于视觉加权的奇异值分解压缩图像质量评价测度[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2010, 32(5): 1061-1065.
    Zhang Fei-yan, Xie Wei, Chen Rong-yuan, et al.. Compression image quality assessment based on human visual weight and singular value decomposition[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2010, 32(5): 1061-1065.
    王翔, 丁勇. 基于Gabor滤波器的全参考图像质量评价方法[J]. 浙江大学学报(工学版), 2013, 47(3): 422-430.
    Wang Xiang and Ding Yong. Full reference image quality assessment based on Gabor filter[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2013, 47(3): 422-430.
    米曾真. 小波域中CSF频率与方向加权的图像质量评价方法[J]. 电子学报, 2014, 42(7): 1273-1276.
    Mi Zeng-zhen. Image quality evaluation method based on frequency and direction weighted to CSF in wavelet domain[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2014, 42(7): 1273-1276.
    Yalman Y. Histogram based perceptual quality assessment method for color images[J]. Computer Standards Interfaces, 2014, 36(6): 899-908.
    Daly S. The visible different predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of images fidelity[C]. Digital Images and Human Vision Conference, Cambridge, England, 1993: 179-206.
    Lubin J. A visual discrimination model for images system design and evaluation[C]. Proceedings of the Conference on Visual Models for Target Detection and Recognition, Singapore City, Singapore, 1995: 207-220.
    Safranek R J and Johnston J D. A perceptually tuned sub-band image coder with image dependent quantization and post-quantization data compression[C]. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoust, Speech and Signal Processing, Glasgow, UK, 1989: 1945-1948.
    Watson A B. DCT quantization matrices visually optimized for individual images[C]. Proceedings of the SPIE Human vision, Visual Processing, and Digital Display IV, Washington, USA, 1993: 202-216.
    Teo P C and Heeger D J. Perceptual image distortion[C]. SPIE International Conference on Image Processing, Texas, USA, 1994: 982-986.
    Wang Zhou, Bovik A C, Sheikh H R, et al.. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2004, 13(4): 600-612.
    Sheikh H R, Bovik A C, and Veciana G D. An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2005, 14(12): 2117-2128.
    Aleksandr S D, Alexander G, and Eskicioglu A M. An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2006, 15(2): 422-429.
    Venkata N D, Kite T D, Bovik A C, et al.. Image quality assessment based on degradation model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2000, 9(4): 636-650.
    Wang Zhou, Simoncelli E P, and Bovik A C. Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment[C]. Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, Pacific Grove, Canada, 2002(2): 1398-1402.
    Zhang Lin, Zhang Lei, Mou Xuanqin, et al.. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2011, 20(8): 2378-2386.
    Ding Yong, Wang Shao-ze, and Zhang Dong. Full-reference image quality assessment using statistical local correlation [J]. Electronics Letters, 2014, 50(2): 79-81.
    Hu An-zhou, Zhang Rong, Yin Dong, et al.. Image quality assessment using a SVD-based structural projection[J]. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2014, 29(3): 293-302.
    Zhang Lin, Shen Ying, and Li Hong-yu. VSI: a visual saliency-induced index for perceptual image quality assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2014, 23(10): 4270-4281.
    Chang Hua-wen, Yang Hua, Gan Yong, et al.. Sparse feature fidelity for perceptual image quality assessment[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2013, 22(10): 4007-4018.
    Larson E C and Chandler D M. Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy[J]. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 2010, 19(1): 011006-1-011006-21.
    Wandell B A. Foundations of Vision[M]. Stanford: Sinauer Associates, 1995: 277-284.
    Wang Zhou, Lu L G, and Bovik A C. Foveation scalablevideo coding with automatic fixation selection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2003, 12(2): 243-254.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1475
  • HTML全文浏览量:  129
  • PDF下载量:  1053
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2014-12-25
  • 修回日期:  2015-04-01
  • 刊出日期:  2015-09-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回