基于球面交点的AFM算法的误差分析与改进方法

陈万通; 秦红磊; 丛丽; 金天

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1146.2009.01278

基于球面交点的AFM算法的误差分析与改进方法

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2009.01278

基金项目:

国家863计划项目(2009AA12Z313)资助课题

计量
- 文章访问数: 3427
- HTML全文浏览量: 120
- PDF下载量: 697
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2009-09-25
- 修回日期: 2010-04-30
- 刊出日期: 2010-09-19

Error Analysis and Improvement of the Ambiguity Function Method Based on the Intersection Point on Sphere

摘要

摘要: 基于球面交点的模糊度函数法是一种利用GPS信号求解载体姿态的有效算法，但其成功率受观测噪声影响很大，针对这一问题，该文对该算法进行了误差分析并提出提高成功率的改进方法。首先将原算法推广到双差观测模型，然后分析噪声的统计特性和误差传播的特点，深入研究了其对姿态解算成功率的影响，最后通过整周模糊度识别算法降低求解过程对噪声的敏感性。实验表明：相比于原算法，改进算法有效地提高了GPS姿态解算的成功率，同时消除了原算法对公共时钟的限制。
- 全球定位系统 /
- 姿态解算 /
- 模糊度函数法 /
- 适应度函数
Abstract: The improved Ambiguity Function Method (AFM) method of intersection point on sphere is an effective algorithm for attitude determination using GPS signal, but the success rate is influenced by observation noise significantly. To deal this problem, in this paper, the error analysis is given and a further improvement method is proposed. First the original algorithm is extended under the double difference observation model. Then the statistical properties of noise and error propagation characteristics are both analyzed, which are followed by in-depth study of its affects to the success rate of attitude determination. Finally the noise sensitivity of the solution process is reduced by integer ambiguity recognition algorithm. The testing results show that the success rate of GPS attitude determination of the proposed algorithm increases greatly over that of the original algorithm while the restriction on public clocks is eliminated.
- GPS /
- Attitude determination /
- Ambiguity Function Method (AFM) /
- Adaptive function

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

Rush John.Current 7s in the use of the global positioning system aboard satellites[J].Acta Astronautica.2000, 47(7):377-387[2]Xia Kewen, Zhang Xinying, and Gao Jinyong, et al.. Study on GPS attitude determination technology based on QPSO algorithm[C]. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Chongqing, China, June 25-27, 2008: 1869-1873.[3]Monikes R, Wendel J, and Trommer G F. A modified Lambda method for ambiguity resolution in the presence of position domain constraints[C]. Proc. 18th Int. Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, California, USA, 2005: 81-87.[4]Kim D and Langley R B. An optimized least squares technique for improving ambiguity resolution performance and computational efficiency[C][J].Proceedings of ION GPS99, Nashville, Tennessee.1999, 9, 14-17:1579-1588[5]Tsai Chin-lang and Kao Wei-wen. Constrained total least-square solution for GPS compass attitude determination[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation.2006, 183(5):106-118[6]Wang Yong-quan, Zhan Xing-qun, and Zhang Yan-hua. Improved ambiguity function method based on analytical resolution for GPS attitude determination[J]. Measurement Science and Technology, 2007, 18(9): 2986-2990.[7]Jin Wen-rui and Zhai Chuan-run, et al.. Hybrid analytical resolution approach based on ambiguity function for attitude determination [J].Journal of Zhejiang University. Science A.2009, 10(7):1038-1048[8]王永泉. 长航时高动态条件下GPS/GLONASS姿态测量研究[D]. [博士论文]，上海交通大学，2008.[9]Wang Yong-quan. GPS/GLONASS attitude determination research under long endurance and high dynamic conditions [D]. [Ph.D. dissertation], Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2008.Hofmann-Wellenhof. GNSS-Global Navigation Satellite Systems GPS, GLONASS, Galieo, and more[M]. Springer Wien, New York, 2008: 227-234.[10]Misra P and Enge P. Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance[M]. 2nd ed.Ganga-Jamuna Press, Lincoln MA, 2006: 238-239.[11]Tiberius C C J M and Borre K. Are GPS data normally distributed? [C]. In: Geodesy beyond 2000. The challenges of the first decade, IAG General Assembly, Birmingham, July 19-30, 1999, Vol. 121: 243-248.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计