一种高效覆盖的水下传感器网络部署策略

黄艳; 梁韦华; 于海斌

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1146.2008.00002

一种高效覆盖的水下传感器网络部署策略

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2008.00002

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(60434030, 60725312, 60704046)和辽宁省青年人才基金(3040004)资助课题

计量
- 文章访问数: 3109
- HTML全文浏览量: 104
- PDF下载量: 717
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2008-01-04
- 修回日期: 2008-12-22
- 刊出日期: 2009-05-19

A Deployment Strategy for Effective Coverage in Underwater Sensor Networks

摘要

摘要: 传感器节点的部署直接关系到水下传感器网络的成本和性能。考虑到传感器节点间具有很强的协同能力，该文提出一种基于检测融合的部署策略。采用Neyman-Pearson准则融合单元网格内所有传感器节点的检测信息，实现正方形和正三角形两种单元网格的高效覆盖，进而分别给出针对两种单元网格的监测区域网格划分方法，从而确定监测区域需要的传感器节点数量以及放置的具体位置。通过仿真实验验证了该部署策略的有效性。结果表明，与不采用检测融合时相比，降低了传感器节点冗余度。使用相同数量的传感器节点，新的部署策略能够在保证一定感知质量的基础之上获得更大的覆盖范围。
- 水下传感器网络;检测融合;部署;覆盖
Abstract: Sensor deployment is related directly to the cost and performance of underwater sensor networks. Considering great cooperative capability of sensor nodes, this paper presents a deployment strategy based on detection fusion. Neyman-Pearson criterion is adopted to fuse the detection information from all sensor nodes in one unit grid, which realizes highly efficient coverage for square and triangle unit grid. The grid plot methods of detection field are presented respectively for two types of unit grid. The number of sensor nodes to monitor the detection field and their locations are determined consequently. The effectiveness of proposed deployment strategy is verified by simulation experiments. The results indicate that sensor node redundancy is decreased in contrast to deployment strategy without detection fusion. With fixed quantity of sensor nodes, the new deployment strategy offers larger coverage area with the desired detection accuracy.

HTML全文

参考文献(1)

Heidemann J, Wei Ye, and Wills J, et al.. Research challengesand applications for underwater sensor networking. IEEEWireless Communications and Networking Conference, LasVegas, 2006, 1: 228-235.[2]Onur E, Ersoy C, and Delic H, et al.. Surveillance wirelesssensor networks: Deployment quality analysis[J].IEEE Network.2007, 21(6):48-53[3]Onur E, Ersoy C, and Delic H. Analysis of target detectionprobability in randomly deployed sensor networks. IEEECommunications Letters, 2007, 11(10): 778-780.[4]Huang C F and Tseng Y C. A survey of solutions to thecoverage problems in wireless sensor networks. Journal ofInternet Technology, 2005, 6(1): 1-8.[5]Bang Wang, Wei Wang, and Srinivasan V, et al.. Informationcoverage for wireless sensor networks. IEEE CommunicationsLetters, 2005, 9(11): 967-969.[6]Bang Wang, Kee Chaing Chua, and Srinivasan V, et al..Scheduling sensor activity for point information coverage inwireless sensor networks. The 4th International Symposiumon Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad hoc andWireless Networks, Boston, April 2006: 1-8.[7]Wei Wang, Srinivasan V, and Kee-Chaing Chua, et al..Energy-efficient coverage for target detection in wirelesssensor networks. The 6th International Symposium onInformation Processing in Sensor Networks, Cambridge,April 2007: 313-322.[8]Zou Xue-yu and Cao Yang. Collaborative detectionprobability of mobile target for coverage in large-scale WSN.The 3rd International Conference on WirelessCommunications, Networking and Mobile Computing,Shanghai, Sept. 2007: 2710-2714.[9]田坦, 刘国枝, 孙大军. 声呐技术. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学出版社, 第1 版, 2000: 195-205.Tian Tan, Liu Guo-zhi, and Sun Da-jun. Sonar Technology.Harbin: Publishing company of Harbin EngineeringUniversity, The 1st edition, 2000: 195-205.[10]Thomopoulos S C A, Viswanathan R, and Bougoulias D C.Optimal decision fusion in multiple sensor systems[J].IEEETrans. on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.1987, 23(5):644-653

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计