高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

面向射频隐身的组网雷达多目标跟踪下射频辐射资源优化分配算法

时晨光 丁琳涛 汪飞 周建江

时晨光, 丁琳涛, 汪飞, 周建江. 面向射频隐身的组网雷达多目标跟踪下射频辐射资源优化分配算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2021, 43(3): 539-546. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200636
引用本文: 时晨光, 丁琳涛, 汪飞, 周建江. 面向射频隐身的组网雷达多目标跟踪下射频辐射资源优化分配算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2021, 43(3): 539-546. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200636
Chenguang SHI, Lintao DING, Fei WANG, Jianjiang ZHOU. Radio Frequency Stealth-based Optimal Radio Frequency Resource Allocation Algorithm for Multiple-target Tracking in Radar Network[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(3): 539-546. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200636
Citation: Chenguang SHI, Lintao DING, Fei WANG, Jianjiang ZHOU. Radio Frequency Stealth-based Optimal Radio Frequency Resource Allocation Algorithm for Multiple-target Tracking in Radar Network[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(3): 539-546. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200636

面向射频隐身的组网雷达多目标跟踪下射频辐射资源优化分配算法

doi: 10.11999/JEIT200636
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(61801212),国防科技创新特区资助,中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2019M650113),江苏省自然科学基金青年基金项目(BK20180423)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    时晨光:男,1989年生,副教授,博士,研究方向为飞行器射频隐身技术,组网雷达资源管理,多平台传感器协同等

    丁琳涛:男,1997年生,硕士生,研究方向为组网雷达资源管理

    汪飞:男,1976年生,副教授,博士,研究方向为飞行器射频隐身技术、雷达信号处理、阵列信号处理等

    周建江:男,1962年生,教授,博士,研究方向为飞行器射频隐身技术、雷达目标特性分析、航空电子信息系统设计等

    通讯作者:

    时晨光 scg_space@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TN953

Radio Frequency Stealth-based Optimal Radio Frequency Resource Allocation Algorithm for Multiple-target Tracking in Radar Network

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61801212), The National Defense Science and Technology Innovation Special Zones, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M650113), The Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20180423)
  • 摘要: 针对组网雷达系统多目标跟踪场景,该文提出一种面向射频(RF)隐身的组网雷达射频辐射资源优化分配算法。首先,采用目标跟踪误差的贝叶斯克拉美-罗下界(BCRLB)作为目标跟踪性能指标。其次,以各雷达照射目标的驻留时间资源和辐射功率资源加权和为优化目标,以BCRLB不大于给定目标跟踪精度阈值及系统射频辐射资源作为约束条件,建立了包含雷达节点分配方式、驻留时间和辐射功率3个优化变量的优化模型。然后,采用两步分解法对上述优化模型进行了求解,即先固定雷达节点选择,利用内点法对简化后的非凸非线性优化模型进行求解,之后再通过匈牙利算法确定最佳雷达节点分配方式。仿真结果表明,相较于辐射资源均匀分配算法,所提算法可以有效降低组网雷达的射频资源消耗,提升系统射频隐身性能。
  • 图  1  目标轨迹与雷达组网分布图

    图  2  目标RCS时变模型

    图  3  RCS起伏场景下两种算法目标跟踪RMSE对比

    图  4  RCS起伏场景下各目标的雷达选择及驻留时间优化分配结果

    图  5  RCS起伏场景下各目标的雷达选择及辐射功率优化分配结果

    图  6  RCS起伏场景下两种算法的总驻留时间对比

    图  7  RCS起伏场景下两种算法的总辐射功率对比

    图  8  RCS起伏场景下驻留时间资源节省率

    图  9  RCS起伏场景下辐射功率资源节省率

    图  10  RCS起伏场景下目标函数值减小率

    表  1  固定雷达分配方式的辐射资源优化控制算法

     步骤 1 令${g_1} = {\kern 1pt} F_{k\left| {k - 1} \right.}^s - {F_{\max }}$,${g_2} = {\kern 1pt} {T_{{\rm{d,min}}}} - T_{{\rm{d}},1,k}^s$, ${g_3} = {\kern 1pt} {T_{{\rm{d,min}}}} - T_{{\rm{d}},2,k}^s$,···, ${g_{M + 1}} = {T_{{\rm{d,min}}}} - {\kern 1pt} T_{{\rm{d}},M,k}^s$, ${g_{M + 2}} = {\kern 1pt} T_{{\rm{d}},1,k}^s - {T_{{\rm{d,max}}}}$,
     ${g_{M + 3}} = {\kern 1pt} T_{{\rm{d}},2,k}^s - {T_{{\rm{d,max}}}}$,···, ${g_{2M + 1}} = {\kern 1pt} T_{{\rm{d}},M,k}^s - {T_{{\rm{d,max}}}}$, ${g_{2M + 2}} = {\kern 1pt} {P_{\min }} - P_{1,k}^s$, ${g_{2M + 3}} = {\kern 1pt} {P_{\min }} - P_{2,k}^s$,···, ${g_{3M + 1}} = {\kern 1pt} {P_{\min }} - P_{M,k}^s$,
     ${g_{3M + 2}} = P_{1,k}^s - {P_{\max }}$,···, ${g_{4M + 1}} = P_{M,k}^s - {P_{\max }}$,设置可行域:$D = \left\{ T_{ {\rm{d} },m,k}^s,P_{m,k}^s\left| {g_a}\left( {T_{ {\rm{d} },m,k}^s,P_{m,k}^s} \right) \le 0,a = 1,2, ··· ,4M + 1,\right.\right.$
     $\left.1 \le m \leq M \right\}$其中,${g_a}\left( {T_{{\rm{d}},m,k}^s,P_{m,k}^s} \right) = {g_a},a = 1,2, ··· ,4M + 1$,取${\left( {T_{{\rm{d}},m,k}^s,P_{m,k}^s} \right)^{\left( 0 \right)}} \in D\left( {1 \le m \le M} \right)$为初始点,$\varepsilon > 0$为算法终
     止指标,${\xi _1} > 0$, $c \ge 2$,令$l = 1$;
     步骤 2 以${\left( {T_{{\rm{d}},m,k}^s,P_{m,k}^s} \right)^{\left( {l - 1} \right)}}$为初始点求解如下子问题:$\min {\kern 1pt} {F_1} - {\xi _1}\left[ {\frac{1}{ { {g_1} } } + \frac{1}{ { {g_2} } } + ··· + \frac{1}{ { {g_{2M + 2} } } } } \right], {\rm{s} }{\rm{.t} }{\rm{.} }{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} T_{ {\rm{d} },m,k}^s,P_{m,k}^s \in D$,其中,${F_1}$表
     示式(7)中的优化目标函数,令上述问题的极小值点为${\left( {T_{{\rm{d}},m,k}^s,P_{m,k}^s} \right)^{\left( l \right)}}$;
     步骤 3 检验终止条件,若$- {\xi _l}\left[ {\dfrac{1}{ { {g_1} } } + \dfrac{1}{ { {g_2} } } + ··· + \dfrac{1}{ { {g_{4M + 1} } } } } \right] < \varepsilon$,算法终止;否则,令${\xi _{l + 1} } \leftarrow \dfrac{ { {\xi _l} } }{c}$, $l \leftarrow l + 1$,转入步骤2。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • 时晨光, 周建江, 汪飞, 等. 机载雷达组网射频隐身技术[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2019: 3–23.

    SHI Chenguang, ZHOU Jianjiang, WANG Fei, et al. Radio Frequency Stealth Technology for Airborne Radar Network[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2019: 3–23.
    严俊坤, 戴奉周, 秦童, 等. 一种针对目标三维跟踪的多基地雷达系统功率分配算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2013, 35(4): 901–907.

    YAN Junkun, DAI Fengzhou, QIN Tong, et al. A power allocation approach for 3D target tracking in multistatic radar systems[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2013, 35(4): 901–907.
    胡捍英, 孙扬, 郑娜娥. 多目标速度估计的分布式MIMO雷达资源分配算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(10): 2453–2460. doi: 10.11999/JEIT151452

    HU Hanying, SUN Yang, and ZHENG Nae. Resource allocation approach in distributed MIMO radar with multiple targets for velocity estimation[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2016, 38(10): 2453–2460. doi: 10.11999/JEIT151452
    LI Jian and STOICA P. MIMO radar with colocated antennas[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2007, 24(5): 106–114. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2007.904812
    FISHLER E, HAIMOVICH A, BLUM R S, et al. Spatial diversity in radars—models and detection performance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2006, 54(3): 823–838. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2005.862813
    ZHANG Haowei, XIE Junwei, SHI Junpeng, et al. Sensor scheduling and resource allocation in distributed MIMO radar for joint target tracking and detection[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 62387–62400. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2916334
    CHAVALI P and NEHORAI A. Scheduling and power allocation in a cognitive radar network for multiple-target tracking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2012, 60(2): 715–729. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2174989
    CHEN Haowen, TA Shiying, and SUN Bin. Cooperative game approach to power allocation for target tracking in distributed MIMO radar sensor networks[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2015, 15(10): 5423–5432. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2015.2431261
    GODRICH H, PETROPULU A P, and POOR H V. Power allocation strategies for target localization in distributed multiple-radar architectures[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(7): 3226–3240. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2011.2144976
    严俊坤, 纠博, 刘宏伟, 等. 一种针对多目标跟踪的多基雷达系统聚类与功率联合分配算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2013, 35(8): 1875–1881.

    YAN Junkun, JIU Bo, LIU Hongwei, et al. Joint cluster and power allocation algorithm for multiple targets tracking in multistatic radar systems[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2013, 35(8): 1875–1881.
    李正杰, 谢军伟, 张浩为, 等. 基于集中式MIMO雷达的多目标跟踪功率分配优化算法[J]. 空军工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 20(5): 76–82.

    LI Zhengjie, XIE Junwei, ZHANG Haowei, et al. Multiple targets tracking power allocation optimization algorithm based on collocated MIMO radar[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 20(5): 76–82.
    ZHANG Haowei, ZONG Binfeng, and XIE Junwei. Power and bandwidth allocation for multi-target tracking in collocated MIMO radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2020, 69(9): 9795–9806. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2020.3002899
    LI Zhengjie, XIE Junwei, ZHANG Haowei, et al. Adaptive sensor scheduling and resource allocation in netted collocated MIMO radar system for multi-target tracking[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 109976–109988. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3001358
    YAN Junkun, PU Wenqiang, ZHOU Shenghua, et al. Optimal resource allocation for asynchronous multiple targets tracking in heterogeneous radar networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2020, 68: 4055–4068. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2020.3007313
    YI Wei, YUAN Ye, HOSEINNEZHAD R, et al. Resource scheduling for distributed multi-target tracking in netted colocated MIMO radar systems[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2020, 68: 1602–1617. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2020.2976587
    YUAN Ye, YI Wei, KIRUBARAJAN T, et al. Scaled accuracy based power allocation for multi-target tracking with colocated MIMO radars[J]. Signal Processing, 2019, 158: 227–240.
    DAI Jinhui, YAN Junkun, WANG Penghui, et al. Optimal resource allocation for multiple target tracking in phased array radar network[C]. 2019 International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (ICCAIS), Chengdu, China, 2019: 1–4. doi: 10.1109/ICCAIS46528.2019.9074602.
    DING Lintao, SHI Chenguang, QIU Wei, et al. Joint dwell time and bandwidth optimization for multi-target tracking in radar network based on low probability of intercept[J]. Sensors, 2020, 20(5): 1269. doi: 10.3390/s20051269
    SHI Chenguang, DING Lintao, WANG Fei, et al. Low probability of intercept-based collaborative power and bandwidth allocation strategy for multi-target tracking in distributed radar network system[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 20(12): 6367–6377. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2020.2977328
    LAWRENCE D E. Low probability of intercept antenna array beamforming[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2010, 58(9): 2858–2865. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2010.2052573
    SHI Chenguang, WANG Fei, SELLATHURAI M, et al. Power minimization-based robust OFDM radar waveform design for radar and communication systems in coexistence[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2018, 66(5): 1316–1330. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2017.2770086
    BOYD S and VANDENBERGHE L. Convex Optimization[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004: 297–301.
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1168
  • HTML全文浏览量:  745
  • PDF下载量:  105
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-07-30
  • 修回日期:  2020-12-09
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-12-22
  • 刊出日期:  2021-03-22

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回