高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

雷达与电子支援措施异步抗差航迹关联算法

衣晓 杜金鹏

衣晓, 杜金鹏. 雷达与电子支援措施异步抗差航迹关联算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2021, 43(7): 1947-1953. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200250
引用本文: 衣晓, 杜金鹏. 雷达与电子支援措施异步抗差航迹关联算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2021, 43(7): 1947-1953. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200250
Xiao YI, Jinpeng DU. Asynchronous Anti-bias Track Association Algorithm of Radar and Electronic Support Measurements[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(7): 1947-1953. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200250
Citation: Xiao YI, Jinpeng DU. Asynchronous Anti-bias Track Association Algorithm of Radar and Electronic Support Measurements[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(7): 1947-1953. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200250

雷达与电子支援措施异步抗差航迹关联算法

doi: 10.11999/JEIT200250
基金项目: 国防科技卓越青年人才基金(2017-JCJQ-ZQ-003),泰山学者工程专项经费(ts201712072)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    衣晓:男,1976年生,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为无线传感器网络、多源信息融合

    杜金鹏:男,1995年生,硕士生,研究方向为数据关联

    通讯作者:

    杜金鹏 jpdu_1409@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TN953; V271.4

Asynchronous Anti-bias Track Association Algorithm of Radar and Electronic Support Measurements

Funds: The Excellent Youth Scholar of the National Defense Science and Technology Foundation of China (2017-JCJQ-ZQ-003), The Special Fund for the Taishan Scholar Project (ts201712072)
  • 摘要: 针对雷达与电子支援措施(ESM)存在系统误差、航迹异步等复杂条件下的航迹关联问题,该文提出一种基于区间序列离散度的异步抗差航迹关联算法。定义混合区间序列的离散信息度量,给出系统误差的区间化方法,通过计算区间离散度并利用经典分配法进行关联判定。与传统算法相比,可在系统误差存在的前提下无需时域配准对异步航迹直接关联,且对噪声分布不敏感。仿真结果表明,所提算法具有良好的抗差性且不受目标运动位置的影响,适用于传感器同地或异地配置等多种情况。
  • 图  1  系统误差示意图

    图  2  算法流程图

    图  3  方位角量测误差下的正确关联率对比

    图  4  不同采样率之比下的正确关联率对比

    图  5  不同目标数目时的正确关联率对比

    图  6  正确关联率随目标运动位置的变化

    表  1  雷达与ESM最大系统误差取值表

    实验编号123456
    $\Delta \theta _{\rm{m}}^s(^\circ )$0.50.51.01.50.50.5
    $\Delta \theta _{\rm{m}}^w(^\circ )$0.50.50.50.51.01.5
    $\Delta \rho _{\rm{m}}^s({\rm{m)}}$5001000500500500500
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同系统误差下的算法关联率对比

    实验编号本文算法文献[9]算法文献[13]算法文献[14]算法
    EcEeEsEcEeEsEcEeEsEcEeEs
    10.9370.0560.0070.7430.0750.1820.9360.0280.0360.8660.0230.111
    20.9320.0600.0080.6980.0490.2530.9350.0330.0320.8580.0240.118
    30.9140.0540.0320.5040.1750.3210.9000.0440.0560.8170.0780.105
    40.8920.0560.0520.4450.2430.3120.8810.0580.0610.7720.0260.202
    50.9440.0470.0090.5060.0900.4040.9370.0230.0400.8400.0480.112
    60.9330.0560.0110.4560.2340.3100.9250.0380.0370.7870.0510.162
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同目标运动模型下的正确关联率

    目标运动模型匀速直线运动匀加速直线运动变加速直线运动匀速圆周运动
    正确关联率0.9310.9280.9230.917
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同采样周期和开机时延的正确关联率

    ESM开机时延(s)雷达,ESM采样周期(时间间隔)(s)
    t1=0.1,t2=0.3t1=0.3,t2=0.5t1=0.5,t2=1.1
    Δt=0.10.9130.9130.834
    Δt=0.20.9220.8910.844
    Δt=0.30.9280.8900.820
    Δt=0.40.9270.8810.831
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  不同噪声分布的正确关联率

    噪声分布形式高斯分布瑞利分布指数分布均匀分布
    正确关联率0.9260.9200.9140.934
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 何友, 王国宏, 关欣, 等. 信息融合理论及应用[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2010: 124–146.

    HE You, WANG Guohong, GUAN Xin, et al. Information Fusion Theory with Applications[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2010: 124–146.
    [2] TU Yongiun, HUANG Gaoming, LI Jinghui, et al. Performance analysis of radar and ESM track association algorithms[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2011, 130–134: 1925–1928. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.130-134.1925
    [3] WANG Guohong, MAO Shiyi, and HE You. Analytical performance evaluation of association of active and passive tracks for airborne sensors[J]. Signal Processing, 2003, 83(5): 973–981. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1684(02)00500-5
    [4] OFFER C R. Performance of bearing-only ESM-radar track association[C]. Proceedings of the 9th IET Data Fusion & Target Tracking Conference, London, UK, 2012: 1–6. doi: 10.1049/cp.2012.0409.
    [5] WANG Guohong, MAO Shiyi, HE You, et al. Triple-threshold radar-to-ESM correlation algorithm when each radar track is specified by different number of measurements[J]. IEE Proceedings - Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 2000, 147(4): 177–181. doi: 10.1049/ip-rsn:20000094
    [6] WANG Guohong, HE You, MAO Shiyi, et al. Quadri-threshold algorithm of co-located radar-to-ESM correlation[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2000, 13(2): 86–90.
    [7] 陈中华, 王国宏, 刘德浩, 等. 基于几何法的雷达与ESM航迹关联算法[J]. 电光与控制, 2012, 19(4): 10–12, 22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2012.04.003

    CHEN Zhonghua, WANG Guohong, LIU Dehao, et al. Radar-ESM track correlation based on geometric method[J]. Electronics Optics &Control, 2012, 19(4): 10–12, 22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2012.04.003
    [8] 关欣, 彭彬彬, 衣晓. 基于区间重合度的雷达与ESM航迹关联算法[J]. 雷达科学与技术, 2017, 15(1): 61–67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2337.2017.01.011

    GUAN Xin, PENG Binbin, and YI Xiao. Track association algorithm of radar and ESM based on the interval overlap ratio[J]. Radar Science and Technology, 2017, 15(1): 61–67. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2337.2017.01.011
    [9] 宋振宇, 张翔宇, 张光轶. 系统误差对异地配置的雷达和ESM航迹关联的影响[J]. 电光与控制, 2014, 21(3): 42–46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2014.03.010

    SONG Zhenyu, ZHANG Xiangyu, and ZHANG Guangyi. Effect of systematic errors on radar-to-ESM track association at different sites[J]. Electronics Optics &Control, 2014, 21(3): 42–46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2014.03.010
    [10] 张翔宇, 王国宏, 王娜, 等. 系统误差下异地配置的雷达和电子支援测量航迹关联[J]. 电光与控制, 2012, 19(3): 30–35, 43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2012.03.007

    ZHANG Xiangyu, WANG Guohong, WANG Na, et al. Track association of radar and ESM sensors with systematic errors at different sites[J]. Electronics Optics &Control, 2012, 19(3): 30–35, 43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-637X.2012.03.007
    [11] ZHANG Feihu and KNOLL A. Systematic error modeling and bias estimation[J]. Sensors, 2016, 16(5): 729. doi: 10.3390/s16050729
    [12] WANG Guohong, ZHANG Xiangyu, and TAN Shuncheng. Effect of biased estimation on radar-to-ESM track association[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2012, 23(2): 188–194. doi: 10.1109/JSEE.2012.00024
    [13] 李保珠, 张林, 董云龙, 等. 基于航迹矢量分级聚类的雷达与电子支援措施抗差关联算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(6): 1310–1316. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180714

    LI Baozhu, ZHANG Lin, DONG Yunlong, et al. Anti-bias track association algorithm of radar and electronic support measurements based on track vectors hierarchical clustering[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(6): 1310–1316. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180714
    [14] 关欣, 彭彬彬, 衣晓. 修正极坐标系下雷达与ESM航迹对准关联[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(5): 320668. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0287

    GUAN Xin, PENG Binbin, and YI Xiao. Track alignment-association of radar and ESM in MPC[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(5): 320668. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0287
    [15] 李保珠, 关键, 董云龙. 基于航迹矢量检测的雷达与电子支援设施抗差关联算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(1): 123–129. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180303

    LI Baozhu, GUAN Jian, and DONG Yunlong. Anti-bias track association algorithm of radar and electronic support measurements based on track vectors detection[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(1): 123–129. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180303
    [16] ZHU Hongyan and WANG Chen. Joint track-to-track association and sensor registration at the track level[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2015, 41: 48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2015.03.012
    [17] 左燕, 陈志猛, 蔡立平. 基于约束总体最小二乘的单站DOA/TDOA联合误差校正与定位算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(6): 1317–1323. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180655

    ZUO Yan, CHEN Zhimeng, and CAI Liping. Single-observer DOA/TDOA Registration and passive localization based on constrained total least squares[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(6): 1317–1323. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180655
    [18] 衣晓, 杜金鹏. 基于分段序列离散度的异步航迹关联算法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 323694. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23694

    YI Xiao and DU Jinpeng. Asynchronous track-to-track association algorithm based on discrete degree of segmented sequence[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(7): 323694. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23694
  • 加载中
图(6) / 表(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1027
  • HTML全文浏览量:  475
  • PDF下载量:  64
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-04-07
  • 修回日期:  2020-11-01
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-12-09
  • 刊出日期:  2021-07-10

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回