区块链用户匿名与可追踪技术

李佩丽; 徐海霞

doi:10.11999/JEIT190813

区块链用户匿名与可追踪技术

doi: 10.11999/JEIT190813

李佩丽,
徐海霞^,

1.
中国科学院信息工程研究所信息安全国家重点实验室北京 100093
2.
中国科学院数据与通信保护研究教育中心北京 100093
3.
中国科学院大学网络空间安全学院北京 100049

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划(2017YFB0802500)，北京市科技计划(Z191100007119007)，山东省重大科技创新工程(2019JZZY020129)

详细信息

作者简介:
李佩丽：女，1988年生，助理研究员，研究方向为密码学、区块链隐私保护与监管

徐海霞：女，1973年生，副研究员，研究方向为安全多方计算、区块链隐私保护与监管、共识机制

通讯作者:
徐海霞　xuhaixia@iie.ac.cn

中图分类号: TP311
计量
- 文章访问数: 4545
- HTML全文浏览量: 2016
- PDF下载量: 453
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-10-22
- 修回日期: 2020-01-20
- 网络出版日期: 2020-02-25
- 刊出日期: 2020-06-04

Blockchain User Anonymity and Traceability Technology

Peili LI,
Haixia XU^,

1.
Institute of Information Engineering of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
2.
Data Assurance and Communication Security Research Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China
3.
School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Funds: The National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0802500), Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project (Z191100007119007), The Major Science and Technology Innovation Project of Shandong Province (2019JZZY020129)

摘要

摘要: 区块链具有透明性、数据完整性、防篡改等优点，在金融、政府、军事等领域有重要应用价值。目前有越来越多的工作研究区块链的隐私保护问题，典型的包括门罗币、Zerocash, Mixcoin等等。这些隐私保护方法可以用于保护区块链上用户的身份和交易的金额。隐私保护方案是双刃剑，一方面是对合法用户隐私的完善保护，另一方面如果完全脱离监管，则是对洗钱、勒索等违法犯罪行为的姑息和纵容。针对区块链上各种层出不穷的隐私保护方案，监管也要与时俱进。该文研究区块链用户身份的隐私保护和监管方法，提出了用户匿名和可追踪的技术，旨在推动区块链在实际中的应用。
- 区块链 /
- 匿名 /
- 追踪 /
- 群签名
Abstract: Blockchain has the advantages of transparency, data integrity, tamper resistance, etc., and has important application value to the fields of finance, government, and military. There are many work to study the privacy protection of the blockchain, typically including Monero, Zerocash, Mixcoin, and more. Their privacy protection methods can be used to protect the identity of the user and the amount of the transaction. The privacy protection scheme is a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it is the perfect protection of the privacy of legitimate users. On the other hand, if it is completely out of supervision, it is the appeasement and connivance of illegal crimes such as money laundering and extortion. In response to the various endangered privacy protection schemes on the blockchain, regulation must also keep pace with the times. In view of this, the privacy protection and supervision methods of blockchain user’s identity is studied, and anonymity and traceability technology to promote the application of blockchain to practice is proposed.
- Blockchain /
- Anonymity /
- Traceability /
- Group signature

HTML全文

图 1 比特币中区块链的简易结构

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 用户注册

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

参考文献(26)

NAKAMOTO S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system[EB/OL]. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf, 2008.

曹素珍, 王斐, 郎晓丽, 等. 基于无证书的多方合同签署协议[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(11): 2691–2698. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190166

CAO Suzhen, WANG Fei, LANG Xiaoli, et al. Multi-party contract signing protocol based on certificateless[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(11): 2691–2698. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190166

NARAYANAN A, BONNEAU J, FELTEN E, et al. Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies: A Comprehensive Introduction[M]. Princeton University Press, 2016.

牛淑芬, 王金风, 王伯彬, 等. 区块链上基于B+树索引结构的密文排序搜索方案[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(10): 2409–2415. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190038

NIU Shufen, WANG Jinfeng, WANG Bobin, et al. Ciphertext sorting search scheme based on b+ tree index structure on blockchain[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(10): 2409–2415. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190038

邹均, 张海宁, 唐屹, 等. 区块链技术指南[M]. 北京: 机械工业出版社, 2016: 97–99.

ZOU Jun, ZHANG Haining, TANG Yi, et al. Guidelines for Blockchain Technology[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016: 97–99.

CHAUM D, FIAT A, and NAOR M. Untraceable Electronic Cash[M]. GOLDWASSER S. Advances in Cryptology — CRYPTO’ 88. New York: Springer, 1990: 319–327. doi: 10.1007/0-387-34799-2_25.

CHAUM D and VAN HEYST E. Group Signatures[M]. DAVIES D W. Advances in Cryptology — EUROCRYPT ’91. Berlin: Springer, 1991: 257–265. doi: 10.1007/3-540-46416-6_22.

GROTH J and SAHAI A. Efficient non-interactive proof systems for bilinear groups[C]. The 27th Annual International Conference on the Theory and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, Istanbul, Turkey, 2008: 415–432. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-78967-3_24.

CHAUM D L. Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1981, 24(2): 84–90. doi: 10.1145/358549.358563

BONNEAU J, NARAYANAN A, MILLER A, et al. Mixcoin: Anonymity for Bitcoin with Accountable Mixes[M]. CHRISTIN N and SAFAVI-NAINI R. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Berlin: Springer, 2014: 486–504. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-45472-5_31.

VALENTA L and ROWAN B. BLIndcoin: Blinded, accountable mixes for bitcoin[C]. 2015 International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, San Juan, USA, 2015: 112–126. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-48051-9_9.

MAXWELL G. Coinjoin: Bitcoin privacy for the real world[EB/OL]. Post on Bitcoin Forum. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279249.0, 2013.

RUFFING T, MORENO-SANCHEZ P, and KATE A. CoinShuffle: Practical decentralized coin mixing for bitcoin[C]. The 19th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, Wroclaw, Poland, 2014: 345–364. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-11212-1_20.

RUFFING T, MORENO-SANCHEZ P, and KATE A. P2P mixing and unlinkable bitcoin transactions[C]. The 24th Annual Network and Distributed System Security Symposium, San Diego, USA, 2017: 824.

RUFFING T and MORENO-SANCHEZ P. Valueshuffle: Mixing confidential transactions for comprehensive transaction privacy in bitcoin[C]. 2017 International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security, Sliema, Malta, 2017: 133–154.

CHANDRAN N, GROTH J, and SAHAI A. Ring signatures of sub-linear size without random oracles[C]. The 34th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming, Wrocław, Poland, 2007: 423–434.

BERGAN T, ANDERSON O, DEVIETTI J, et al. CryptoNote v 2.0[J]. https://cryptonote.org/whitepaper.pdf, 2013.

LIU J K, WEI V K, and WONG D S. Linkable spontaneous anonymous group signature for ad hoc groups[C]. The 9th Australasian Conference on Information Security and Privacy, Sydney, Australia, 2004: 325–335. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-27800-9_28.

MIERS I, GARMAN C, GREEN M, et al. Zerocoin: Anonymous distributed e-cash from bitcoin[C]. 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, Berkeley, USA, 2013: 397–411.

BEN SASSON E, CHIESA A, GARMAN C, et al. Zerocash: Decentralized anonymous payments from bitcoin[C]. 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, San Jose, USA, 2014: 459–474.

BEN-SASSON E, CHIESA A, TROMER E, et al. Succinct non-interactive zero knowledge for a von Neumann architecture[C]. The 23rd USENIX Conference on Security Symposium, Berkeley, USA, 2014: 781–796.

PEDERSEN T P. Non-interactive and information-theoretic Secure Verifiable Secret Sharing[M]. FEIGENBAUM J. Annual International Cryptology— CRYPTO ’91. Berlin: Springer, 1991: 129–140. doi: 10.1007/3-540-46766-1_9.

FUJISAKI E and SUZUKI K. Traceable ring signature[C]. The 10th International Conference on Practice and Theory in Public-Key Cryptography, Beijing, China, 2007: 181–200. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-71677-8_13.

GROTH J. Fully anonymous group signatures without random oracles[C]. The 13th International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptology and Information Security, Kuching, Malaysia, 2007: 164–180. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-76900-2_10.

ZHOU Sujing and LIN Dongdai. Shorter Verifier-local Revocation Group Signatures from Bilinear Maps[M]. POINTCHEVAL D, MU Yi, and CHEN Kefei. Cryptology and Network Security. Berlin: Springer, 2006: 126–143. doi: 10.1007/11935070_8.

BONEH D and BOYEN X. Short Signatures without Random Oracles[M]. CACHIN C and CAMENISCH J L. Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2004. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 56–73. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-24676-3_4.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计