Quality Evaluation of Night Vision Anti-halation Fusion Image Based on Adaptive Partition
-
摘要:
针对夜视晕光场景中，高亮度晕光信息导致现有红外与可见光融合图像评价方法失效的问题，该文提出一种自适应分区的融合图像质量评价方法。该方法根据可见光图像的晕光程度自动确定自适应系数，并通过迭代计算可见光灰度图像的晕光临界灰度值，将融合图像自动分为多个晕光区和非晕光区；在晕光区由设计的晕光消除度指标评价融合图像的晕光消除效果；在非晕光区从融合图像自身特性、对原始图像信息保留程度以及人眼视觉效果3方面评价融合图像纹理色彩等细节信息的增强效果；通过对4种不同抗晕光算法的融合图像进行评价分析，甄选出9种客观评价指标构成夜视抗晕光融合图像质量评价体系。不同夜视晕光场景下的实验结果表明，所提方法能够全面、合理地评价红外与可见光融合的抗晕光图像质量，解决了融合图像晕光消除越彻底客观评价结果反而越差的问题，也适于评判不同抗晕光融合算法的优劣。
Abstract:To solve the failure of existing evaluation methods of infrared and visible fusion image caused by high brightness halation information in night vision halation scene, a novel fusion image quality evaluation method based on adaptive partition is proposed. In this method, the adaptive coefficient is automatically determined according to the halation degree of visible image, and then, the fusion image is divided into halo regions and non-halo region by iterative calculation of the critical halation gray value. In the halo region, the effectiveness of halation elimination is evaluated by halation elimination index designed, while in the non-halo region, the enhancement effect of detailed information such as texture and color is evaluated from three aspects including: characteristics of fusion image itself, retention degree of original image information and human visual effect. Based on evaluation and analysis of fusion images obtained by 4 different anti-halation algorithms, nine objective indexes are selected to construct a quality evaluation system of night vision anti-halation fused image. Experimental results in different night vision halation scenes show that the proposed method could evaluate anti-halation image quality of infrared and visible fusion comprehensively and reasonably, and could solve the problem that the more thorough halation elimination of fusion image, the worse objective evaluation results. This method could also be suitable for evaluating merits and demerits of different anti-halation fusion algorithms.
-
Key words:
- Fusion image /
- Image quality evaluation /
- Night vision anti-halation /
- Adaptive partition
-
表 1 曲线拟合优度
曲线 SSE RMSE R2 基线 0.0481 0.0310 0.9487 上界 0.0293 0.0318 0.9566 下界 0.0304 0.0313 0.9559 最优 0.0042 0.0174 0.9910 
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 无参考图像客观评价指标
算法 非晕光区融合图像 未分区融合图像 μ σ E AG EI SF μ σ E AG EI SF IHS 55.5114 23.7201 4.7715 1.6149 1.3009 9.1389 102.1417 25.9308 5.7862 3.9899 14.0576 10.1062 曲波 66.4604 28.0101 4.7845 3.5071 4.1962 14.5914 105.3180 38.7324 6.8762 6.8807 18.7757 21.1077 IHS-曲波 72.6815 30.0118 5.4760 3.7987 7.3702 17.1324 106.8972 39.4403 7.0812 7.7245 20.8070 22.9812 改进IHS-曲波 94.8522 30.7021 6.0882 4.3367 7.3808 19.3482 104.9308 38.4334 6.6463 6.3063 15.0324 19.3287
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 全参考图像客观评价指标
算法 CEFU-VI MIFU-VI RMSEFU-VI PSNRFU-VI CEFU-IR MIFU-IR RMSEFU-IR PSNRFU-IR IHS 0.9961 1.1810 30.9468 58.7218 0.9831 1.0933 30.8392 60.3349 曲波 0.4655 1.9853 27.7219 63.7648 0.6850 1.6314 29.7961 65.5507 IHS-曲波 0.3018 2.5135 26.8683 64.9261 0.5247 3.1821 25.9617 67.8470 改进 IHS-曲波 0.2051 3.0012 23.7003 65.9410 0.3289 4.8819 24.9118 68.2431
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 视觉系统的客观评价指标
算法 SSIMFU-VI SSIMFU-IR QAB/F IHS 0.5792 0.6004 0.3361 曲波 0.6632 0.7443 0.4048 IHS-曲波 0.6732 0.7516 0.4539 改进IHS-曲波 0.6761 0.7611 0.5740
下载: 导出CSV
-
MÅRSELL E, BOSTRÖM E, HARTH A, et al. Spatial control of multiphoton electron excitations in InAs nanowires by varying crystal phase and light polarization[J]. Nano Letters, 2018, 18(2): 907–915. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04267 朱美萍, 孙建, 张伟丽, 等. 高性能偏振膜的研制[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2016, 24(12): 2908–2915. doi: 10.3788/OPE.20162412.2908ZHU Meiping, SUN Jian, ZHANG Weili, et al. Development of high performance polarizer coatings[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016, 24(12): 2908–2915. doi: 10.3788/OPE.20162412.2908 CHRZANOWSKI K. Review of night vision technology[J]. Opto-Electronics Review, 2013, 21(2): 153–181. doi: 10.2478/s11772-013-0089-3 KWAK J Y, KO B C, and NAM J Y. Pedestrian tracking using online boosted random ferns learning in far -infrared imagery for safe driving at night[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation System, 2017, 18(1): 69–81. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2569159 JEONG M R, KWAK J Y, SON J E, et al. Fast pedestrian detection using a night vision system for safety driving[C]. The 11th International Conference on Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization, Singapore, 2014: 69–72. doi: 10.1109/CGiV.2014.25. BOSIERS J T, KLEIMANN A C, VAN KUIJK H C, et al. Frame transfer CCDs for digital still cameras: Concept, design, and evaluation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2002, 49(3): 377–386. doi: 10.1109/16.987106 王健, 高勇, 雷志勇, 等. 基于双CCD图像传感器的汽车抗晕光方法研究[J]. 传感技术学报, 2007, 20(5): 1053–1056. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2007.05.023WANG Jian, GAO Yong, LEI Zhiyong, et al. Research of auto anti-blooming method based on double CCD image sensor[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 2007, 20(5): 1053–1056. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2007.05.023 GUO Quanmin and LI Xiaoling. Car anti-blooming method based on visible and infrared image fusion[J]. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2015(4): 115–121. HU Haimiao, WU Jiawei, LI Bo, et al. An adaptive fusion algorithm for visible and infrared videos based on entropy and the cumulative distribution of gray levels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2017, 19(12): 2706–2719. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2017.2711422 QIAO Tiezhu, CHEN Lulu, PANG Yusong, et al. Integrative multi-spectral sensor device for far-infrared and visible light fusion[J]. Photonic Sensors, 2018, 8(2): 134–145. doi: 10.1007/s13320-018-0401-4 陈清江, 张彦博, 柴昱洲, 等. 有限离散剪切波域的红外可见光图像融合[J]. 中国光学, 2016, 9(5): 523–531. doi: 10.3788/CO.20160905.0523CHEN Qingjiang, ZHANG Yanbo, CHAI Yuzhou, et al. Fusion of infrared and visible images based on finite discrete shearlet domain[J]. Chinese Optics, 2016, 9(5): 523–531. doi: 10.3788/CO.20160905.0523 江泽涛, 吴辉, 周哓玲. 基于改进引导滤波和双通道脉冲发放皮层模型的红外与可见光图像融合算法[J]. 光学学报, 2018, 38(2): 0210002. doi: 10.3788/AOS201838.0210002JIANG Zetao, WU Hui, and ZHOU Xiaoling. Infrared and visible image fusion algorithm based on improved guided filtering and dual-channel spiking cortical model[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2018, 38(2): 0210002. doi: 10.3788/AOS201838.0210002 LI Leida, XIA Wenhan, LIN Weisi, et al. No-reference and robust image sharpness evaluation based on multiscale spatial and spectral features[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2017, 19(5): 1030–1040. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2016.2640762 JAIN A and BHATEJA V. A full-reference image quality metric for objective evaluation in spatial domain[C]. 2011 International Conference on Communication and Industrial Application, Kolkata, India, 2011. doi: 10.1109/ICCIndA.2011.6146668. CHEN Guo, LI Li, JIN Weiqi, et al. Image contrast enhancement method based on display and human visual system characteristics[J]. Applied Optics, 2019, 58(7): 1813–1823. doi: 10.1364/AO.58.001813 XU Hailong, CHEN Yong, GU Dexian, et al. Evaluating goodness-of-fit in comparison of different expressions for length-weight relationship in fishery resources[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2014, 651-653: 337–343. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.651-653.337 徐正光, 鲍东来, 张利欣. 基于递归的二值图像连通域像素标记算法[J]. 计算机工程, 2006, 32(24): 186–188, 225. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3428.2006.24.067XU Zhengguang, BAO Donglai, and ZHANG Lixin. Pixel labeled algorithm based on recursive method of connecting area in binary images[J]. Computer Engineering, 2006, 32(24): 186–188, 225. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3428.2006.24.067 叶盛楠, 苏开娜, 肖创柏, 等. 基于结构信息提取的图像质量评价[J]. 电子学报, 2008, 36(5): 856–861. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0372-2112.2008.05.005YE Shengnan, SU Kaina, XIAO Chuagbai, et al. Image quality assessment based on structural information extraction[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2008, 36(5): 856–861. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0372-2112.2008.05.005 郭全民, 王言, 李翰山. 改进IHS-Curvelet变换融合可见光与红外图像抗晕光方法[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2018, 47(11): 1126002. doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1126002GUO Quanmin, WANG Yan, and LI Hanshan. Anti-halation method of visible and infrared image fusion based on improved IHS-Curvelet transform[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2018, 47(11): 1126002. doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1126002 郭全民, 董亮, 李代娣. 红外与可见光图像融合的汽车抗晕光系统[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2017, 46(8): 0818005. doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0818005GUO Quanmin, DONG Liang, and LI Daidi. Vehicles anti- halation system based on infrared and visible images fusion[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2017, 46(8): 0818005. doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0818005 YU Tianshu and WANG Ruisheng. Scene parsing using graph matching on street- view data[J]. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 2016, 145: 70–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cviu.2016.01.004 期刊类型引用(12)
1. PENG Fang，WU Jun，WANG Shuai，LI Zhijun，XIANG Jianjun. An anti-main-lobe jamming algorithm for airborne early warning radar based on APC-SVRGD joint optimization. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics. 2022(01): 134-143 . 
必应学术2. 付孝龙，白渭雄，李欣，陈津津. 单脉冲雷达多通道辅助处理主瓣干扰对消方法. 华中科技大学学报(自然科学版). 2017(07): 100-104 . 百度学术3. 窦慧晶，陈凤菊，王千龙，肖登亮. 双息信号的斜投影滤波性能. 北京工业大学学报. 2016(05): 691-696+787 . 百度学术4. 吴盛源，张小宽，刘铭，田松. 雷达最佳接收极化滤波优化研究. 传感器与微系统. 2016(11): 68-70+73 . 百度学术5. 任博，施龙飞，王国玉. 基于环境扰动模型的干扰抑制极化滤波器性能研究. 电子学报. 2016(03): 527-534 . 百度学术6. 陈津津，付孝龙. 机载自卫式电子干扰对抗技术研究. 飞航导弹. 2016(06): 50-54 . 百度学术7. 王雪松. 雷达极化技术研究现状与展望. 雷达学报. 2016(02): 119-131 . 百度学术8. 任博，施龙飞，王国玉. UHF波段雷达面临基站干扰信号的极化特性测量与分析. 雷达学报. 2016(02): 164-173 . 百度学术9. 施龙飞，任博，马佳智，李永祯. 雷达极化抗干扰技术进展. 现代雷达. 2016(04): 1-7+29 . 百度学术10. 任博，罗笑冰，邓方刚，王国玉. 应用极化聚类中心设计快速自适应极化滤波器. 国防科技大学学报. 2015(04): 87-92 . 百度学术11. 张建军. 基于MHT的网络化雷达抗干扰算法. 计算机工程与设计. 2015(02): 415-418+451 . 百度学术12. 刘文钊，戴幻尧，黄振宇，崔建岭. 基于空域调制效应的干扰极化参数估计. 应用科学学报. 2015(05): 518-526 . 百度学术其他类型引用(11)
-
必应学术
计量
- 文章访问数: 2245
- HTML全文浏览量: 1032
- PDF下载量: 55
- 被引次数: 23
下载:
