多运营商频谱共享模型和租赁策略

徐林林; 朱晓荣

doi:10.11999/JEIT160471

多运营商频谱共享模型和租赁策略

doi: 10.11999/JEIT160471

徐林林¹,
朱晓荣²

1.
(南京邮电大学江苏省无线通信重点实验室南京 210003) ②(东南大学移动通信国家重点实验室南京 210003)

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(61372125)；国家973计划项目(2013CB329104)；东南大学移动通信国家重点实验室开放研究基金(2013D01)；江苏省高校自然科学研究面上项目(14KJB510026)

计量
- 文章访问数: 1403
- HTML全文浏览量: 241
- PDF下载量: 418
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-05-10
- 修回日期: 2016-09-30
- 刊出日期: 2017-03-19

Spectrum Sharing Model and Leasing Strategy for Multiple Operators

XU Linlin¹,
ZHU Xiaorong²

1.
(Wireless Communication Key Laboratory of Jangsu Province, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Nanjing 210003, China)

Funds:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61372125), The National 973 Project of China (2013CB329104), The Open Research Fund of National Mobile Communications Research Laboratory, Southeast University (2013D01), The Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (14KJB510026)

摘要

摘要: 传统的静态频谱分配方式难以适应未来无线通信业务的发展需求，可能导致运营商业务和用户服务质量受到限制。针对此问题，该文建立了一个包括频谱租赁服务平台层、运营商层及用户层的多运营商频谱共享模型。在该模型中，多个A类运营商将其多余频谱放置在频谱租赁服务平台，供B类运营商租赁，B类运营商与多个A类运营商既竞争用户又共享部分频谱。该文形成了以各类运营商利润最大化为优化目标，以A类运营商的频谱出租量和B类运营商租赁的频谱种类及数量为优化变量的最优化问题，并求得最优解。仿真结果表明，所提策略在保证用户服务质量(QoS)的同时，显著提高频谱资源利用率，并使运营商利润大幅增加。
- 频谱共享 /
- 频谱租赁服务平台 /
- 运营商 /
- 频谱租赁 /
- 频谱利用率
Abstract: Traditional static spectrum allocation can not adapt to the future development of wireless communication services, leading to limited profits for operators and poor Quality of Service (QoS) for users. To solve the problem, this paper proposes a three-layer spectrum sharing model including operators, users, and a spectrum leasing platform, where A operators place their excess spectrum in the leasing platform for B operators to lease. This paper considers a situation where multiple operators cooperate to share portions of spectrum but compete to serve users, then the optimal spectrum leasing strategy is studied. The goal of this paper is to find the optimal leasing strategy for both A and B operators to maximize their profits while guaranteeing the QoS for users. Numerical results show that the proposed strategy not only improves the efficiency of spectrum utilization effectively but also shows a big advantage in increasing operators profits.
- Spectrum sharing /
- Spectrum leasing platform /
- Operators /
- Spectrum leasing /
- Spectrum efficiency

HTML全文

参考文献(16)

LEAVES P, MOESSNER K, TAFAZOLLI R, et al. Dynamic spectrum allocation in composite reconfigurable wireless networks[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2004, 42(5): 72-81. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.2004.1299346.

刘勤, 李红霞, 李钊, 等. 基于认知的LTE系统动态频谱分配[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2015, 37(1): 175-181. doi:10.11999/ JEIT140001.

LIU Qin, LI Hongxia, LI Zhao, et al. Spectrum allocation for LTE system by exploiting cognitive capability [J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2015, 37(1): 175-181. doi: 10.11999/JEIT140001.

黎文边, 林粤伟, 王小猛, 等. 认知无线网络中基于微观经济学的动态频谱管理算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2009, 31(4): 897-902. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01890.

LE Vanbien, LIN Yuewei, WANG Xiaomeng, et al. A microeconomics based dynamic spectrum management algorithm for cognitive wireless networks[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2009, 31(4): 897-902. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01890.

DUAN L, GAO L, and HUANG J. Cooperative spectrum sharing: a contract-based approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2014, 13(1): 174-187. doi: 10.1109/TMC. 2012.231.

CHUN S H and LA R J. Secondary spectrum trading: auction-based framework for spectrum allocation and profit sharing[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 2013, 21(1): 176-189. doi: 10.1109/TNET.2012.2191418.

PANG D, ZHU M, HU G, et al. Spectrum sublet game among secondary users in cognitive radio networks[C]. International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, Qufu, China, 2015: 427-436.

于巧玲, 王江, 徐景. 浅谈跨运营商同优先级频谱共享[J]. 邮电设计技术, 2015, 1(6): 1-4. doi: 10.16463/j.cnki.issn1007- 3043.2015.06.001.

YU Qiaoling, WANG Jiang, and XU Jing. Discussion on inter-operator co-primary spectrum sharing[J]. Designing Techniques of Posts and Telecommunications, 2015, 1(6): 1-4. doi: 10.16463/j.cnki.issn1007-3043.2015.06.001.

MATINMIKKO M, OKKONEN H, PALOLA M, et al. Spectrum sharing using licensed shared access: the concept and its workflow for LTE-advanced networks[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2014, 21(2): 72-79. doi: 10.1109/ MWC.2014.6812294.

ZHU K, HOSSAIN E, and NIYATO D. Pricing, spectrum sharing, and service selection in two-tier small cell networks: a hierarchical dynamic game approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2014, 13(8): 1843-1856. doi: 10.1109/ TMC.2013.96.

HAMOUDA S, ZITOUN M, and TABBANE S. Win-win relationship between macrocell and femtocells for spectrum sharing in LTE-A[J]. IET Communications, 2014, 8(7): 1109-1116. doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2013.0845.

MAILLE P and TUFFIN B. Price war with partial spectrum sharing for competitive wireless service providers[C]. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 2009: 1-6. doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2009.5425725.

LUO Y, GAO L, and HUANG J. Price and inventory competition in oligopoly tv white space markets[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2015, 33(5): 1002-1013. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2014.2361093.

BADIA L, LINDSTROM M, ZANDER J, et al. Demand and pricing effects on the radio resource allocation of multimedia communication systems[C]. 2003 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2003: 4116-4121. doi: 10.1109/GLOCOM.2003.1259002.

施引文献

资源附件(0)

访问统计