高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

物理层超高频射频识别标签信号分离中的信道估计

物理层超高频射频识别标签信号分离中的信道估计[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(1): 119-126. doi: 10.11999/JEIT150476
引用本文: 物理层超高频射频识别标签信号分离中的信道估计[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(1): 119-126. doi: 10.11999/JEIT150476
Channel Estimation for Recovery of UHF RFID Tag Collision on Physical Layer[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2016, 38(1): 119-126. doi: 10.11999/JEIT150476
Citation: Channel Estimation for Recovery of UHF RFID Tag Collision on Physical Layer[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2016, 38(1): 119-126. doi: 10.11999/JEIT150476

物理层超高频射频识别标签信号分离中的信道估计

doi: 10.11999/JEIT150476
基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金(61262091),云南省第十七批中青年学术和技术带头人资助项目(2014HB019),云南省教育厅科学基金重点项目(2014Z093),云南民族大学研究生创新基金项目(2015YJCXY254)

Channel Estimation for Recovery of UHF RFID Tag Collision on Physical Layer

Funds: 

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61262091), The 17th Batches of Young and Middle-aged Leaders in Academic and Technical Reserved Talents Project of Yunnan Province (2014HB019), The Project of Scientific Research Foundation of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education (2014Z093), The Project of Postgraduate Innovation Foundation of Yunnan Minzu University (2015YJCXY254)

  • 摘要: 在被动式的超高频(UHF)射频识别(RFID)系统中,当多个标签选择同一个时隙向阅读器发送信息,标签间冲突就会产生,该冲突通常只在介质访问控制(MAC)层上解决。其实,若冲突信号在物理层上被分离,识别效率将能得到很大的提高。在物理层冲突信号分离中,信道估计是一项关键技术,因为好的信道估计有助于准确地恢复冲突信号。传统的信道估计方法在两个标签冲突的情况下具有较好的估计性能,但当冲突标签数超过2时,却会产生较高的误差。该文针对物理层的UHF RFID信号分离问题,提出一种新的信道估计方法。该方法利用已知的前缀信号,采用最小二乘方法对信道进行估计。从实验结果看,当标签冲突数超过2时,该文提出的信道估计方法的误差要小于传统的估计方法,而且估计的信道得到的分离效率也高于传统方法。
  • FINKENZELLER K. RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards, Radio Frequency Identification and Near-Field Communications[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley Sons, 2010: 1-22.
    KLAIR D K, CHIN K W, and RAAD R. A survey and tutorial of RFID anti-collision protocols[J]. IEEE Communicaitons Surveys Tutorial, 2010, 12(3): 400-421.
    李志坚, 赖顺桥. 一种基于碰撞位指示的射频识别标签防碰撞算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2014, 36(12): 2842-2847. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2013.01759.
    LI Zhijian and LAI Shunqiao. An anti-collision algorithm based on collided bits indicator in radio frequency identification systems[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2014, 36(12): 2842-2847. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2013.01759.
    WU Haifeng, ZENG Yu, FENG Jihua, et al. Binary tree slotted aloha for passive RFID tag anti-collision[J]. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2013, 24(1): 19-31.
    王云峰, 张斌, 刘洋, 等. 基于码分多址防碰撞的射频识别认证协议[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2014, 36(6): 1472-1477. doi: 10. 3724/SP.J.1146.2013.01337.
    WANG Yunfeng, ZHANG Bin, LIU Yang, et al. Radio frequency identification authentication protocol based on CDMA anti-collision algorithm[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2014, 36(6): 1472-1477. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2013.01337.
    ZHANG Lijuan, XIANG Wei, and TANG Xiao-hu. An adaptive anti-collision protocol for large-scale RFID tag identification[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2014, 3(6): 601-604.
    SHAO Min, JIN Xiao-fang, and JIN Li-bao. An improved dynamic adaptive multi-tree search anti-collision algorithm based on RFID[C]. International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Shanghai, 2014: 72-75.
    LAI Yuancheng and HSIAO Ling-yen. General binary tree protocol for coping with the capture effect in RFID tag identification[J]. IEEE Communications Letters, 2010, 14(3): 208-210.
    WU Haifeng and ZENG Yu. Bayesian tag estimate and optimal frame length for anti-collision aloha RFID system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2010, 7(4): 963-969.
    李青青, 刘洪武, 张小林. 一种基于不等长时隙的射频识别防碰撞算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2011, 33(11): 2628-2633. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2011.00303.
    LI Qingqing, LIU Hongwu, and ZHANG Xiaolin. An anti-collision algorithm based on unequal timeslots in radio frequency identification system[J]. Journal of Electronics Information Technology, 2011, 33(11): 2628-2633. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2011.00303.
    SHEN D, WOO G, REED D P, et al.. Separation of multiple
    passive RFID signals using software defined radio[C]. IEEE
    International Conference on RFID, Orlando, FL, 2009: 139-146.
    ANGERER C, LANGWIESER R, and RUPP M. RFID reader receivers for physical layer collision recovery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2010, 58(12): 3526-3537.
    FYHN K, JACOBSEN R M, POPOVSKI P, et al. Multipacket reception of passive UHF RFID tags: a communication theoretic approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2011, 59(9): 4225-4237.
    BLETSAS A, KIMIONIS J, DIMITRIOU A G, et al. Single-antenna coherent detection of collided FM0 RFID signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2012, 60(3): 756-766.
    BENBAGHDAD M, FERGANI B, TEDJINI S, et al. Simulation and measurement of collision signal in passive UHF RFID system and edge transition anti-collision algorithm[C]. IEEE RFID Technology and Applications Conference (RFID-TA), Tampere, 2014: 277-282.
    NIKITIN P V, RAO K V S, and MARTINEZ R D. Differential RCS of RFID tag[J]. Electronics Letters, 2007, 43(8): 431-432.
    International Standard ISO/IEC 18000-6. Information technology Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) for item management Part 6: Parameters for air interface communications at 860 MHz to 960 MHz[S]. 2004.
    EPCglobal. Radio-frequency identification protocols class-1 generation-2 UHF RFID protocol for communications at 860 ~960 MHz Version 1.2.0[S]. 2008.
    李益勇, 杨庆之. 广义逆矩阵几种算法的复杂度比较[J]. 南开大学学报, 2012, 45(5): 7-13.
    LI Yiyong and YANG Qingzhi. The comparison of generalized inverse matrix algorithms complexity[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis, 2012, 45(5): 7-13.
  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1262
  • HTML全文浏览量:  110
  • PDF下载量:  551
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2015-04-27
  • 修回日期:  2015-08-25
  • 刊出日期:  2016-01-19

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回