Optimization of Energy Consumption in Semantic Communication Networks for Image Recovery Tasks

CHEN Yang; MA Huan; JI Zhi; LI Ying Qi; LIANG Jia Yu; GUO Lan

doi:10.11999/JEIT250915

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Electronics & Information Technology > 2026 >

CHEN Yang, MA Huan, JI Zhi, LI Ying Qi, LIANG Jia Yu, GUO Lan. Optimization of Energy Consumption in Semantic Communication Networks for Image Recovery Tasks[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250915

Citation:

CHEN Yang, MA Huan, JI Zhi, LI Ying Qi, LIANG Jia Yu, GUO Lan. Optimization of Energy Consumption in Semantic Communication Networks for Image Recovery Tasks[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250915

Citation:

PDF( 4922 KB)

Optimization of Energy Consumption in Semantic Communication Networks for Image Recovery Tasks

doi: 10.11999/JEIT250915 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT250915

1.
Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210007, China
2.
Tong Fang Electronic Science & Technology Co., Ltd, Jiujiang 332005, China

Funds: The National Science Fund of China for the Excellent Young Scholars (62122094), The Key Projects of the Basic Research Program of Jiangsu Province (BK20253031)

Received Date: 2025-09-15
Accepted Date: 2025-12-08
Rev Recd Date: 2025-12-08

Available Online: 2025-12-13

Abstract

Abstract

Objective With the rapid development of semantic communication and the increasing demand for high-fidelity image recovery, high computational and transmission energy consumption remains a key factor limiting network deployment. Existing resource management strategies are largely static and show limited adaptability to dynamic wireless environments and user mobility. To address these issues, a robust energy optimization strategy driven by a modified Multi-Agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) algorithm is proposed. By jointly optimizing communication and computing resources, the total network energy consumption is minimized while strictly satisfying multi-dimensional constraints, including latency and image recovery quality. Methods First, a theoretical model of the semantic communication network is constructed, and a closed-form expression for the user Symbol Error Rate (SER) is derived through asymptotic analysis of the uplink Signal-to-Interference-plus-Noise Ratio (SINR). Subsequently, the coupling relationships among semantic extraction rate, transmit power, computing resources, and network energy consumption are quantified. On this basis, a joint optimization model is formulated to minimize total energy consumption under constraints of delay, accuracy, and reliability. To solve this mixed-integer nonlinear programming problem, a modified MAPPO algorithm is designed. The algorithm integrates Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to capture temporal dynamics of user positions and channel states, and introduces a noise mechanism into the global state and advantage function to improve policy exploration and robustness. Results and Discussions Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm consistently outperforms baseline methods, including standard MAPPO, NOISE-MAPPO, LSTM-MAPPO, MADDPG, and greedy algorithms. The proposed strategy accelerates training convergence by 66.7%–80% relative to the benchmarks. In dynamic environments, network energy consumption stability is improved by approximately 50%, and user latency stability is enhanced by more than 96%. Additionally, the average SER is reduced by 4%–16.33% without degrading final image recovery performance, demonstrating an effective balance between energy efficiency and task reliability. Conclusions This study addresses energy optimization in semantic communication networks by combining theoretical modeling with a modified deep reinforcement learning framework. The proposed decision-making approach enhances the standard MAPPO algorithm through LSTM-based temporal feature extraction and noise-assisted robust exploration. Simulation results in dynamic single-cell and multi-cell scenarios show that the method improves convergence efficiency and system stability, and achieves a favorable trade-off between energy consumption and service quality. These results provide a theoretical basis and an efficient resource management framework for future energy-constrained semantic communication systems.
- Semantic communication,
- Resource management,
- Energy consumption,
- Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	张平. 语义通信: 未来通信系统的智简之道[J]. 中兴通讯技术, 2024, 30(1): 1. doi: 10.12142/ZTETJ.202401001. ZHANG Ping. Semantic communication: The intelligent and concise way to the future communication system[J]. ZTE Technology Journal, 2024, 30(1): 1. doi: 10.12142/ZTETJ.202401001.
[2]	朱政宇, 梁馨月, 孙钢灿, 等. 智能超表面赋能语义通信系统研究综述[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(2): 287–295. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240984. ZHU Zhengyu, LIANG Xinyue, SUN Gangcan, et al. Research overview of reconfigurable intelligent surface enabled semantic communication systems[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(2): 287–295. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240984.
[3]	ZHANG Ping, LIU Yiming, SONG Yile, et al. Advances and challenges in semantic communications: A systematic review[J]. National Science Open, 2024, 3(4): 20230029. doi: 10.1360/nso/20230029.
[4]	SHAO Yulin, CAO Qi, and GÜNDÜZ D. A theory of semantic communication[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2024, 23(12): 12211–12228. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2024.3406375.
[5]	PENG Xiang, QIN Zhijin, TAO Xiaoming, et al. A robust image semantic communication system with multi-scale vision transformer[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2025, 43(4): 1278–1291. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2025.3531413.
[6]	VAN CHIEN T, PHONG L H, PHUC D X, et al. Image restoration under semantic communications[C]. 2022 International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications, Ha Noi, Vietnam, 2022: 332–337. DOI: 10.1109/ATC55345.2022.9943000.
[7]	ZHANG Guangyi, HU Qiyu, QIN Zhijin, et al. A unified multi-task semantic communication system for multimodal data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2024, 72(7): 4101–4116. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3364990.
[8]	YAN Zhigang and LI Dong. Semantic communications for digital signals via carrier images[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2025, 14(6): 1816–1820. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2025.3557843.
[9]	LIANG Chengyang and LI Dong. Image generation with supervised selection based on multimodal features for semantic communications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2025.3615798.
[10]	DAI Jincheng, WANG Sixian, TAN Kailin, et al. Nonlinear transform source-channel coding for semantic communications[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2022, 40(8): 2300–2316. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2022.3180802.
[11]	YANG Pujing, ZHANG Guangyi, and CAI Yunlong. Rate-adaptive generative semantic communication using conditional diffusion models[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2025, 14(2): 539–543. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2024.3515656.
[12]	YUAN Weiwen, REN Jinke, WANG Chongjie, et al. Generative semantic communication for joint image transmission and segmentation[C]. 2025 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops, Montreal, Canada, 2025: 1110–1115. doi: 10.1109/ICCWorkshops67674.2025.11162317.
[13]	ZHANG Guangyi, YANG Pujing, CAI Yunlong, et al. From analog to digital: Multi-order digital joint coding-modulation for semantic communication[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2025, 73(6): 4257–4271. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3511949.
[14]	TUNG T Y, KURKA D B, JANKOWSKI M, et al. DeepJSCC-Q: Constellation constrained deep joint source-channel coding[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Information Theory, 2022, 3(4): 720–731. doi: 10.1109/JSAIT.2022.3231042.
[15]	YANG Zhaohui, CHEN Mingzhe, ZHANG Zhaoyang, et al. Energy efficient semantic communication over wireless networks with rate splitting[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2023, 41(5): 1484–1495. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2023.3240713.
[16]	ZHANG Hongwei, SHAO Shuo, TAO Meixia, et al. Deep learning-enabled semantic communication systems with task-unaware transmitter and dynamic data[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2023, 41(1): 170–185. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2022.3221991.
[17]	翟凯. 基于MMSE检测的MIMO及大规模MIMO系统性能精确分析[D]. [博士论文], 西南交通大学, 2021. doi: 10.27414/d.cnki.gxnju.2021.000015. ZHAI Kai. Exact performance analysis of MIMO and massive MIMO systems with MMSE receiver[D]. [Ph. D. dissertation], Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021. doi: 10.27414/d.cnki.gxnju.2021.000015.
[18]	QIN Langtian, LU Hancheng, CHEN Yuang, et al. Toward decentralized task offloading and resource allocation in user-centric MEC[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2024, 23(12): 11807–11823. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2024.3399766.
[19]	张峻伟, 吕帅, 张正昊, 等. 基于样本效率优化的深度强化学习方法综述[J]. 软件学报, 2022, 33(11): 4217–4238. doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006391. ZHANG Junwei, LÜ Shuai, ZHANG Zhenghao, et al. Survey on deep reinforcement learning methods based on sample efficiency optimization[J]. Journal of Software, 2022, 33(11): 4217–4238. doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006391.
[20]	HU Siyue and HU Jian. Noisy-MAPPO: Noisy advantage values for cooperative multi-agent actor-critic methods[J]. arXiv: 2106.14334v1, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2106.14334.
[21]	SCHULMAN J, WOLSKI F, DHARIWAL P, et al. Proximal policy optimization algorithms[J]. arXiv: 1707.06347, 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1707.06347.
[22]	LILLICRAP T P, HUNT J J, Pritzel A, et al. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning[C]. The 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, San Juan, Puerto Rico, 2016.