Design of Rotation Invariant Model Based on Image Offset Angle and Multibranch Convolutional Neural Networks

ZHANG Meng; LI Xiang; ZHANG Jingwei

doi:10.11999/JEIT240417

Volume 46 Issue 12

Dec. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Electronics & Information Technology > 2024 > 46(12): 4522-4528

ZHANG Meng, LI Xiang, ZHANG Jingwei. Design of Rotation Invariant Model Based on Image Offset Angle and Multibranch Convolutional Neural Networks[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(12): 4522-4528. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240417

Citation:

ZHANG Meng, LI Xiang, ZHANG Jingwei. Design of Rotation Invariant Model Based on Image Offset Angle and Multibranch Convolutional Neural Networks[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(12): 4522-4528. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240417

Citation:

PDF( 2393 KB)

Design of Rotation Invariant Model Based on Image Offset Angle and Multibranch Convolutional Neural Networks

doi: 10.11999/JEIT240417 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT240417

1.
School of Integrated Circuits, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
2.
School of Physical Sciences and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

Funds: The Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2021B1101270006)

Received Date: 2024-05-29
Rev Recd Date: 2024-11-08

Available Online: 2024-11-18

Publish Date: 2024-12-01

Abstract

Abstract

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) exhibit translation invariance but lack rotation invariance. In recent years, rotating encoding for CNNs becomes a mainstream approach to address this issue, but it requires a significant number of parameters and computational resources. Given that images are the primary focus of computer vision, a model called Offset Angle and Multibranch CNN (OAMC) is proposed to achieve rotation invariance. Firstly, the model detect the offset angle of the input image and rotate it back accordingly. Secondly, feed the rotated image into a multibranch CNN with no rotation encoding. Finally, Response module is used to output the optimal branch as the final prediction of the model. Notably, with a minimal parameter count of 8 k, the model achieves a best classification accuracy of 96.98% on the rotated handwritten numbers dataset. Furthermore, compared to previous research on remote sensing datasets, the model achieves up to 8% improvement in accuracy using only one-third of the parameters of existing models.
- Deep learning,
- Rotated image classification,
- Offset angle,
- Multibranch Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN)

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	MO Hanlin and ZHAO Guoying. RIC-CNN: Rotation-invariant coordinate convolutional neural network[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2024, 146: 109994. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109994.
[2]	ZHU Tianyu, FERENCZI B, PURKAIT P, et al. Knowledge combination to learn rotated detection without rotated annotation[C]. 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, Canada, 2023: 15518–15527. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52729.2023.01489.
[3]	HAN Jiaming, DING Jian, XUE Nan, et al. ReDet: A rotation-equivariant detector for aerial object detection[C]. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, USA, 2021: 2785–2794. doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00281.
[4]	LI Feiran, FUJIWARA K, OKURA F, et al. A closer look at rotation-invariant deep point cloud analysis[C]. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Montreal, Canada, 2021: 16198–16207. doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.01591.
[5]	MARCOS D, VOLPI M, KOMODAKIS N, et al. Rotation equivariant vector field networks[C]. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 2017: 5058–5067. doi: 10.1109/ICCV.2017.540.
[6]	EDIXHOVEN T, LENGYEL A, and VAN GEMERT J C. Using and abusing equivariance[C]. Proceedings of 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, Paris, France, 2023: 119–128. doi: 10.1109/ICCVW60793.2023.00019.
[7]	LECUN Y, BOTTOU L, BENGIO Y, et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86(11): 2278–2324. doi: 10.1109/5.726791.
[8]	JADERBERG M, SIMONYAN K, ZISSERMAN A. Spatial transformer networks[C]. The 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Montreal, Canada, 2015: 2017–2025.
[9]	LAPTEV D, SAVINOV N, BUHMANN J M, et al. TI-POOLING: Transformation-invariant pooling for feature learning in convolutional neural networks[C]. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 289–297. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.38.
[10]	ZHOU Yanzhao, YE Qixiang, QIU Qiang, et al. Oriented response networks[C]. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, USA, 2017: 4961–4970. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.527.
[11]	WORRALL D E, GARBIN S J, TURMUKHAMBETOV D, et al. Harmonic networks: Deep translation and rotation equivariance[C]. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, USA, 2017: 7168–7177. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.758.
[12]	WEILER M, HAMPRECHT F A, and STORATH M. Learning steerable filters for rotation equivariant CNNs[C]. 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Salt Lake City, USA, 2018: 849–858. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2018.00095.
[13]	FIRAT H. Classification of microscopic peripheral blood cell images using multibranch lightweight CNN-based model[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2024, 36(4): 1599–1620. doi: 10.1007/s00521-023-09158-9.
[14]	WEI Xuan, SU Shixiang, WEI Yun, et al. Rotational convolution: Rethinking convolution for downside fisheye images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2023, 32: 4355–4364. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2023.3298475.
[15]	COHEN T S, GEIGER M, KOEHLER J, et al. Spherical CNNs[C]. The Sixth International Conference on Learning Representations, Vancouver, Canada, 2018.
[16]	WEILER M and CESA G. General e(2)-equivariant steerable cnns[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2019, 32.
[17]	CHENG Gong, HAN Junwei, ZHOU Peicheng, et al. Multi-class geospatial object detection and geographic image classification based on collection of part detectors[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2014, 98: 119–132. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.10.002.
[18]	WU Zhize, WAN Shouhong, WANG Xiaofeng, et al. A benchmark data set for aircraft type recognition from remote sensing images[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2020, 89: 106132. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106132.
[19]	XIA Guisong, HU Jingwen, HU Fan, et al. AID: A benchmark data set for performance evaluation of aerial scene classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(7): 3965–3981. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2685945.
[20]	SIMONYAN K and ZISSERMAN A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition[C]. The 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, San Diego, USA, 2015.