Zhou Hua-Chun, Zhang Hong-Ke, Qin Ya-Juan. A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(12): 2999-3004. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2008.00220
Citation:
Zhou Hua-Chun, Zhang Hong-Ke, Qin Ya-Juan. A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(12): 2999-3004. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2008.00220
Zhou Hua-Chun, Zhang Hong-Ke, Qin Ya-Juan. A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(12): 2999-3004. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2008.00220
Citation:
Zhou Hua-Chun, Zhang Hong-Ke, Qin Ya-Juan. A Proxy Mobile IPv6 Based Global Mobility Management Architecture and Protocol[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(12): 2999-3004. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2008.00220
This paper specifies a Proxy Mobile IPv6 based Global Mobility Management architecture and protocol procedure, named PMIPGMM. In PMIPGMM, the mobility management is performed by network entity other than mobile node itself. The other benefit is the elimination of the wireless link data delivery tunnel overhead between the mobile node and the access router. To compare with well known hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management protocol, the location update, the packet delivery and total cost functions generated by a mobile node during its average domain residence time in each protocol are formulated based on fluid flow mobility model. Then, the impacts of various system parameters on the cost functions are analyzed, respectively. The analysis results indicate that the proposed proxy mobile IPv6 based global mobility management protocol can guarantees lower total costs.
[1] Johnson D, Perkins C, and Arkko J. Mobility support in IPv6.RFC 3775. June 2004. [2] Gundavelli S, Leung K, and Devarapalli V, et al.. Proxymobile IPv6. draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-10. February2008. [3] 3GPP, 3GPP system architecture evolution (SAE): Reporton technical options and conclusions. 3GPP TR 23.882 0.10.1.February 2006. [4] ITU-T Draft New Recommendation Q. MMF, GenericFramework of Mobility Management for Next-GenerationNetworks (version 1.5). September 2007. [5] Sarikaya B and Xia F. DHCPv6 based home network prefixdelegation for PMIPv6. draft-sarikaya-netlmm-prefixdelegation-01. November 2007. [6] Troan O and Droms R. IPv6 prefix options for dynamic hostconfiguration protocol (DHCP) version 6. RFC 3633.December 2003. [7] Lior A, Chowdhury K, and Tschofenig H. RADIUS mobileIPv6 support. draft-ietf-mip6-radius-03. November 2007. [8] Vixie P, Thomson S, and Rekhter Y, et al.. Dynamic updatesin the domain name system (DNS UPDATE). RFC 2136.April 1997. [9] Soliman H, Castelluccia C, and El Malki K, et al..Hierarchical mobile IPv6 mobility management (HMIPv6).RFC 4140. August 2005. [10] Chowdhury K and Yegin A. MIP6-bootstrapping for theintegrated scenario.draft-ietf-mip6-bootstrapping- integrated-dhc-04. June 2007. [11] Kong Ki-Sik and Song MoonBae, et al.. A comparativeanalysis on the signaling load of mobile IPv6 and hierarchicalmobile IPv6: analytical approach[J].IEICE Trans. onInformation and Systems.2006, E89-D(1):139-149 [12] Zhang X, Castellanos G, and Campbell A T. P-MIP: Pagingextensions for Mobile IP[J].Mobile Networks and Applications(MONET.2002, 7(2):127-141 [13] Pack S and Choi Y. A study on performance of hierarchicalmobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks. IEICE Trans. onCommun., 2004, E87-B(3): 462-469.