Cryptanalysis of Three Blind Proxy Multi-signature Schemes

Wang Tian-yin; Liu Mai-xue; Wen Qiao-yan

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01338

Volume 31 Issue 2

Dec. 2010

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Electronics & Information Technology > 2009 > 31(2): 493-496

Yang Hongchun, Ruan Chengli, Yang Chun, Lin Weitao. The study of axial energy decaying property influenced by pulse waveform[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2003, 25(10): 1430-1435.

Citation:

Wang Tian-yin, Liu Mai-xue, Wen Qiao-yan. Cryptanalysis of Three Blind Proxy Multi-signature Schemes[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2009, 31(2): 493-496. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01338

Citation:

PDF( 212 KB)

Cryptanalysis of Three Blind Proxy Multi-signature Schemes

doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.01338

Wang Tian-yin^{①②;刘麦学},
Liu Mai-xue,
Wen Qiao-yan

Received Date: 2007-08-17
Rev Recd Date: 2008-01-14
Publish Date: 2009-02-19

Abstract

Abstract

Through the cryptanalysis of three blind proxy multi-signature schemes, it shows that in Li Yuan et al.s scheme, any original signer can sign a valid blind proxy multi-signature by the means of forging proxy key, and in Kang Li et al.s first type blind proxy multi-signature scheme, attacker not only can forge any proxy signers proxy sub-key, but also can forge blind proxy multi-signatures on any message, and in Kang Li et al.s second type blind proxy multi-signature scheme, attacker can sign a valid blind proxy multi-signature by the means of forging proxy key, therefore the three schemes are not secure.

FullText(HTML)

References(1)

References

Mambo M, Usuda K, and Okmoto E. Proxy signatures:Delegation of the power to sign messages [J]. IEICE Trans. onFundamentals of Electronic Communications and ComputerSciences, 1996, E79-A(9): 1338-1354.[2]谷利则, 张胜, 杨义先. 一种新型的代理签名方案[J].电子与信息学报.2005, 27(9):1463-1466浏览[3]Hsu C L, Tsai K Y, and Tsai P L. Cryptanalysis andimprovement of nonrepudiable threshold multi-proxy multisignaturescheme [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2007,177(2): 543-549.[4]Lu E J L, Hwang M S, and Huang C J. A new proxy signaturescheme with revocation [J].Applied Mathematics andComputation.2005, 161(3):799-806[5]伊丽江. 代理签名体制及应用研究[D]. [博士论文], 西安电子科技大学, 2000.Yi Li-jiang. Study on proxy signature schemes and theirapplications [D]. Xidian University, 2000.[6]李媛, 尹为民. 一种具有双重性质的盲代理签名[J]. 计算机应用研究, 2003, 20(11): 16-19.Li Yuan and Yin Wei-min. A kind of blind proxy signaturewith dual property [J]. Application Research of Computers,2003, 20(11): 16-19. ..[7]康莉, 蔡勉, 王亚军. 基于Nyberg-Rueppel 签名体制的盲代理多重签名[J]. 通信学报, 2007, 28(3): 116-119.Kang Li, Cai Mian, and Wang Ya-jun. Blind proxy multisignatureschemes based on Nyberg-Rueppel signaturescheme[J]. Journal on Communications, 2007, 28(3): 116-119.

Relative Articles

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(17)

1.	孙志国，王程，王震铎，宁晓燕. 高速切换场景下的双门限判决算法研究. 哈尔滨工程大学学报. 2024(06): 1196-1201 .
2.	王瑞峰，范文静. 基于改进灰色-马尔可夫模型的LTE-R越区切换算法. 重庆大学学报. 2023(07): 44-52 .
3.	李翠然，张泽鹏，谢健骊. 基于LSTM动态波束赋形的高速列车越区切换算法. 铁道学报. 2023(10): 78-86 .
4.	张佳健，李翠然，谢健骊. 位置功率联合判决的高铁通信越区切换算法. 计算机工程. 2022(10): 212-217 .
5.	钟华，牛宏侠，李翔宇. 基于信号接收功率与波束赋形辅助的切换算法. 科技创新与应用. 2020(13): 11-14 .
6.	李勇，顾晓峻，徐中亮. CBTC系统在无线干扰下的平稳运行措施. 铁道通信信号. 2020(09): 68-71 .
7.	温强，李积英，杨永红，王磊. 基于灰色预测的LTE-R越区切换算法. 激光与光电子学进展. 2020(19): 63-71 .
8.	陈永刚，杜涛，王攀琦，戴乾军. 基于功率-距离的LTE-R切换算法优化研究. 重庆邮电大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(01): 57-64 .
9.	张凌峰. 一种基于速率阀值触发的智能切换算法. 科技视界. 2019(14): 98-100 .
10.	丁青锋，王丽姚. 高速场景下基于位置信息的切换优化算法. 计算机工程与应用. 2019(16): 64-69 .
11.	王瑞峰，席皓哲，姚军娟，吝天锁，郭博迪，臧浩月. 基于位置信息与波束赋形辅助的LTE-R切换算法研究. 云南大学学报(自然科学版). 2019(06): 1137-1143 .
12.	张雁鹏，党建武，林俊亭. 基于IEEE 802.11ac标准的城市轨道交通CBTC系统切换算法. 兰州交通大学学报. 2018(01): 57-64 .
13.	陈鹏，米根锁，罗淼. 高速铁路LTE-R改进切换算法的研究. 铁道标准设计. 2018(05): 150-154 .
14.	凌启东，张雷，王鸿磊，王博. 高铁环境下LTE-R快速切换算法. 计算机工程与设计. 2018(11): 3333-3339 .
15.	陈攀，胡照文，廖聪维，罗衡，邓联文. 基于车载数据库协同触发的高铁LTE-R切换算法. 应用科学学报. 2018(06): 925-935 .
16.	陈永刚，李德威，张彩珍. 一种基于速度的LTE-R越区切换优化算法. 铁道学报. 2017(07): 67-72 .
17.	李德威，陈永刚. 基于速度动态函的LTE-R越区切换优化算法. 铁道标准设计. 2016(11): 143-147 .