Yang Shui-gen, Zhou Hua-chun, Zhang Hong-ke, Qin Ya-juan . Mobility Support in HIP Based on Dynamic Hierarchical Location Management[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(7): 1615-1618. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.00062
Citation:
Yang Shui-gen, Zhou Hua-chun, Zhang Hong-ke, Qin Ya-juan . Mobility Support in HIP Based on Dynamic Hierarchical Location Management[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(7): 1615-1618. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.00062
Yang Shui-gen, Zhou Hua-chun, Zhang Hong-ke, Qin Ya-juan . Mobility Support in HIP Based on Dynamic Hierarchical Location Management[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(7): 1615-1618. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.00062
Citation:
Yang Shui-gen, Zhou Hua-chun, Zhang Hong-ke, Qin Ya-juan . Mobility Support in HIP Based on Dynamic Hierarchical Location Management[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2008, 30(7): 1615-1618. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2007.00062
The existing mobility support scheme in Host Identity Protocol (HIP) does not support micro-mobility. In this paper, a new mobility support scheme in HIP based on dynamic hierarchical location management is proposed. The Internet is separated into some autonomous areas while each autonomous area is separated into some registration areas. When the node moves in the same registration area, it updates its registration at Local RendezVous Server (LRVS). When the node moves in the same autonomous area, it updates its registration at Gateway RendezVous Server (GRVS). The node selects LRVS and determines the optimal size of registration area according to its mobility and packet arrival rate. Analytical results show that the new scheme outperforms the existed mobility support scheme in terms of reducing the overall signaling cost.
Hari B, Karthik L, and Sylvia R, et al.. A layered namingarchitecture for the internet[J].ACM SIGCOMM ComputerCommunication Review.2004, 34(4):343-352[2]Robert M and Pekka N. RFC 4423-Host identity protocol(HIP) architecture. IETF, 2006.Robert M, Pekka N, Petri J, et al.. Draft-ietf-hip-base-06-Host identity protocol. IETF, 2006.Julien L and Lars E. Draft-ietf-hip-rvs-05-Host identityprotocol (HIP) rendezvous extension. IETF, 2006.[3]Thomas R H. Host mobility for ip networks: A comparison.IEEE Networks, 2003, 17(6): 18-26.[4]Fan Y G, Imrich C, and Lin Y B. Portable movementmodeling for PCS networks. IEEE Trans. on VehicularTechnology, 2000, 49(4): 1356-1363.[5]Jiang X and Ian F A. An optimal location management schemefor minimizing signaling cost in mobile ip. Proceedings ofIEEE International Conference on Communications, NewYork, USA, 28-30 April, 2002: 3313-3317.
DownLoad: