Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YU Taosong, YANG Qianqian, HU Zhuo, LI Mingkai, WU Jiajun, SU Yufan, PAN Junyu, SHI Zhiguo, CHEN Jiming. DroneRFc-MM: Anti-UAV Multimodal Detection Measured Dataset[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260889
Citation: YU Taosong, YANG Qianqian, HU Zhuo, LI Mingkai, WU Jiajun, SU Yufan, PAN Junyu, SHI Zhiguo, CHEN Jiming. DroneRFc-MM: Anti-UAV Multimodal Detection Measured Dataset[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260889

DroneRFc-MM: Anti-UAV Multimodal Detection Measured Dataset

doi: 10.11999/JEIT260889 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT260889
Funds:  The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2025YFF0514600)
  • Received Date: 2026-06-30
  • Accepted Date: 2026-07-29
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-07-11
  • Available Online: 2026-08-08
  • Objective: A comprehensive multimodal benchmark is developed for Anti-Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) detection in low-altitude urban environments. Existing datasets generally provide limited sensing modalities and UAV models, with relatively coarse annotations that constrain tasks requiring spatial, motion, and cross-modal information. DroneRFc-MM addresses these limitations by providing synchronized multimodal data, broader coverage of consumer-grade DJI UAV models, and fine-grained annotations for target detection, UAV model recognition, trajectory analysis, flight-direction reasoning, and multimodal fusion evaluation. Methods: DroneRFc-MM is synchronously collected using six heterogeneous sensor types: a Pan-Tilt-Zoom (PTZ) camera, a fisheye camera, a Radio Frequency (RF) antenna, LiDAR, millimeter-wave radar, and a microphone array. Data are acquired on an open rooftop at a university in Zhejiang Province, representing a typical urban low-altitude environment. The dataset contains recordings of six consumer-grade DJI UAV models. All devices are synchronized using a common network time reference, with inter-device timestamp discrepancies of approximately 0.3 s. The UAVs fly in “H”-shaped and vertical reciprocating trajectories at distances of 20–60 m from the sensor array. Fine-grained annotations, including UAV model, position, attitude, and velocity, are derived from flight logs. For the flight-direction reasoning task, approximately 5-s multimodal clips are generated, including camera videos, RF spectrogram videos, microphone audio, and coordinate-based text representations of radar point-cloud data. Zero-shot inference is conducted using Qwen 3.6-Plus and Qwen 3.5-Omni-Plus with unified prompts. Prediction accuracy and inference time are evaluated by comparing predicted directions with ground-truth directions calculated from UAV positioning data. Results and Discussions: The DroneRFc-MM dataset provides multimodal data from six sensor types and six consumer-grade DJI UAV models, together with fine-grained annotations and sample extraction tools. In the flight-direction reasoning task, the Qwen-series multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve accuracies ranging from 20% to 30% across the different input modalities. The inference time is also relatively long, with the mean response time exceeding 40 s for most sensor inputs. These results indicate that current general-purpose MLLMs can capture weak motion-related information from UAV videos, audio, RF spectrograms, and point-cloud data, but their accuracy and response speed remain insufficient for practical real-time Anti-UAV detection. Conclusions: DroneRFc-MM provides a multimodal benchmark for Anti-UAV detection, UAV model recognition, flight-direction reasoning, and multimodal model evaluation. The dataset integrates six sensor types, six consumer-grade DJI UAV models, and fine-grained annotations within a common measurement framework. The experimental results show that current general-purpose MLLMs remain limited in flight-direction reasoning and real-time inference in Anti-UAV scenarios. Domain-specific pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, knowledge augmentation, and lightweight inference are therefore needed to improve their practical utility. Future work will expand the dataset scale and application scenarios to support intelligent and efficient low-altitude airspace management systems.
  • loading
  • [1]
    DOLATA M and SCHWABE G. Moving beyond privacy and airspace safety: Guidelines for just drones in policing[J]. Government Information Quarterly, 2023, 40(4): 101874. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101874.
    [2]
    LAKHWANI T S, SINJANA Y, and KAPOOR A P. Dynamic medical logistics with drone-truck collaboration and pheromone decay in ant colony optimization[J]. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics, 2026, 13(1): 2626506. doi: 10.1080/23302674.2026.2626506.
    [3]
    XIE Yingdong, GUO Yan, and GAO Jie. Object detection and UAV inspection for intelligent agriculture-husbandry application research[C]. The 2025 International Conference on Smart Agriculture and Artificial Intelligence, Xi’an, China, 2025: 223–228. doi: 10.1145/3767624.3767656.
    [4]
    钱志鸿, 王义君. 低空经济赋能者: 智能无人机技术体系综述与展望[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2026, 48(1): 1–33. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251246.

    QIAN Zhihong and WANG Yijun. Intelligent unmanned aerial vehicles for low-altitude economy: A review of the technology framework and future prospects[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2026, 48(1): 1–33. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251246.
    [5]
    王威, 佘丁辰, 王加琪, 等. 多模型融合的无人机异常航迹校正方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(5): 1332–1344. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241026.

    WANG Wei, SHE Dingchen, WANG Jiaqi, et al. Multi-model fusion-based abnormal trajectory correction method for unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(5): 1332–1344. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241026.
    [6]
    LIU Ziyi, AN Pei, YANG You, et al. Vision-based drone detection in complex environments: A survey[J]. Drones, 2024, 8(11): 643. doi: 10.3390/drones8110643.
    [7]
    俞宁宁, 毛盛健, 周成伟, 等. DroneRFa: 用于侦测低空无人机的大规模无人机射频信号数据集[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(4): 1147–1156. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230570.

    YU Ningning, MAO Shengjian, ZHOU Chengwei, et al. DroneRFa: A large-scale dataset of drone radio frequency signals for detecting low-altitude drones[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(4): 1147–1156. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230570.
    [8]
    任俊宇, 俞宁宁, 周成伟, 等. DroneRFb-DIR: 用于非合作无人机个体识别的射频信号数据集[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(3): 573–581. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240804.

    REN Junyu, YU Ningning, ZHOU Chengwei, et al. DroneRFb-DIR: An RF signal dataset for non-cooperative drone individual identification[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(3): 573–581. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240804.
    [9]
    YU Ningning, WU Jiajun, ZHOU Chengwei, et al. Open set learning for RF-based drone recognition via signal semantics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024, 19: 9894–9909. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2024.3463535.
    [10]
    YU Ningning, WU Jiajun, ZHOU Chengwei, et al. SMNet: Multi-drone detection and classification via monitoring flight control signals on spectrograms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 2025, 11(5): 3245–3259. doi: 10.1109/TCCN.2025.3537100.
    [11]
    KÜMMRITZ S. The sound of surveillance: Enhancing machine learning-driven drone detection with advanced acoustic augmentation[J]. Drones, 2024, 8(3): 105. doi: 10.3390/drones8030105.
    [12]
    SUN Chunlin, MAO Xingpeng, TANG Zhibo, et al. Radar false alarm suppression based on target spatial temporal stationarity for UAV detecting[J]. Drones, 2024, 8(12): 699. doi: 10.3390/drones8120699.
    [13]
    JIANG Nan, WANG Kuiran, PENG Xiaoke, et al. Anti-UAV: A large-scale benchmark for vision-based UAV tracking[J]. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 2023, 25: 486–500. doi: 10.1109/TMM.2021.3128047.
    [14]
    YUAN Shenghai, YANG Yizhuo, NGUYEN T H, et al. MMAUD: A comprehensive multi-modal anti-UAV dataset for modern miniature drone threats[C]. The 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Yokohama, Japan, 2024: 2745–2751. doi: 10.1109/ICRA57147.2024.10610957.
    [15]
    SHI Rui, YU Xiaodong, WANG Shengming, et al. RFUAV: A benchmark dataset for unmanned aerial vehicle detection and identification[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2503.09033, 2025. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.09033.
    [16]
    ZHU Chen, ZHAO Zhouxiang, SHAN Zejing, et al. Robust target detection of intelligent integrated optical camera and mmWave radar system[J]. Digital Signal Processing, 2024, 145: 104336. doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2023.104336.
    [17]
    SAKELLARIOU N, LALAS A, VOTIS K, et al. Multi-sensor fusion for UAV classification based on feature maps of image and radar data[J/OL]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2410.16089, 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.16089.
    [18]
    ZHAO W X, ZHOU Kun, LI Junyi, et al. A survey of large language models[J]. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2026, 20(12): 2012627. doi: 10.1007/s11704-026-60308-3.
    [19]
    LI Junnan, LI Dongxu, SAVARESE S, et al. BLIP-2: Bootstrapping language-image pre-training with frozen image encoders and large language models[C]. The 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, Honolulu, USA, 2023: 814. doi: 10.5555/3618408.3619222.
    [20]
    DOSOVITSKIY A, BEYER L, KOLESNIKOV A, et al. An image is worth 16×16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale[C]. The 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021.
    [21]
    RADFORD A, KIM J W, HALLACY C, et al. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision[C/OL]. The 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2021.
    [22]
    XI Zhiheng, CHEN Wenxiang, GUO Xin, et al. The rise and potential of large language model based agents: A survey[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2025, 68(2): 121101. doi: 10.1007/s11432-024-4222-0.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1000) PDF downloads(207) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return