Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
DONG Pengyu, XIANG Xin, LV Siting, LIANG Yuan, WANG Rui, MAO Hu. A Lightweight Dual-Stream Convolutional Network Feature Fusion Method for UAV RF Recognition[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260464
Citation: DONG Pengyu, XIANG Xin, LV Siting, LIANG Yuan, WANG Rui, MAO Hu. A Lightweight Dual-Stream Convolutional Network Feature Fusion Method for UAV RF Recognition[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260464

A Lightweight Dual-Stream Convolutional Network Feature Fusion Method for UAV RF Recognition

doi: 10.11999/JEIT260464 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT260464
  • Received Date: 2026-04-30
  • Accepted Date: 2026-08-10
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-07-31
  • Available Online: 2026-08-20
  •   Objective  With the rapid proliferation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and the escalating demand for airspace security, radio frequency (RF) fingerprint recognition has emerged as a pivotal technology for identifying non-cooperative UAVs. However, existing methods grapple with significant challenges, including poor robustness in low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) environments and prohibitive computational complexity, which severely hinder their deployment on resource-constrained tactical edge devices. To address these critical limitations, this paper proposes a novel lightweight dual-stream convolutional network tailored for UAV RF recognition. This network is designed to extract static spectral texture features and dynamic temporal gradient features in parallel, complemented by a meticulously crafted lightweight feature fusion strategy.  Methods  The proposed network architecture is ingeniously designed to process RF signals. The input signal undergoes a Short-Time Fourier Transform (STFT) to generate a two-dimensional spectrogram, which serves as the primary input. The network is bifurcated into two parallel streams: a static stream and a dynamic stream. The static stream is engineered to capture the inherent static spectral patterns and energy distributions within the STFT spectrogram. It comprises a series of stacked convolutional blocks, each integrating convolutional layers, batch normalization, and ReLU activation functions, followed by max-pooling layers to progressively downsample the feature maps and increase the channel depth. Conversely, the dynamic stream is dedicated to enhancing feature discriminability, particularly in low-SNR scenarios. It begins by computing the temporal gradient of the input spectrogram, effectively suppressing static background noise and accentuating dynamic signal variations. This gradient map is then processed by a symmetric set of convolutional blocks, mirroring the structure of the static stream. To maintain model efficiency, an element-wise addition fusion strategy is employed to integrate the features from both streams, ensuring a balance between feature complementarity and computational overhead. The fused features are subsequently fed into a classification head, consisting of an adaptive average pooling layer, dropout layers for regularization, and fully connected layers to produce the final classification output. Extensive experiments are conducted on the publicly available DroneRF dataset, encompassing ablation studies to dissect the contribution of each component, comparative analyses of various fusion strategies, and rigorous evaluations of the model’s lightweight characteristics.  Results and Discussions  The experimental results unequivocally demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method. The dual-stream network achieves a remarkable 95.65% accuracy on the test set, representing a substantial 5 percentage point improvement over the best-performing single-stream network. A critical analysis reveals that the temporal gradient operation contributes significantly to this enhancement by improving the average SNR by 1 dB, thereby bolstering feature discriminability in challenging low-SNR environments. Furthermore, the model’s lightweight design is a standout feature, with a mere 0.58 million parameters, making it eminently suitable for deployment on tactical edge devices. Ablation studies and feature visualization analyses provide compelling evidence for the complementary nature of static and dynamic features. The static stream adeptly captures broad spectral contours, while the dynamic stream focuses on fine-grained temporal variations. The element-wise addition fusion strategy proves superior, outperforming other approaches like feature concatenation and attention-based fusion in terms of both performance and computational efficiency, thereby validating the rationale behind the lightweight design.  Conclusions  This paper presents a comprehensive solution to the challenges of UAV RF recognition in complex environments by proposing a lightweight dual-stream convolutional network. The method effectively enhances recognition accuracy and robustness through the synergistic combination of dual-stream feature extraction and the SNR-enhancing properties of temporal gradient features, all while maintaining a lightweight architecture suitable for edge deployment. The proposed approach offers a significant advancement in the field, providing a robust and efficient solution for UAV identification. Future research endeavors will focus on further enhancing the model’s adaptability to complex electromagnetic environments, incorporating the effects of sensor noise, and extending the framework to multi-UAV cooperative scenarios.
  • loading
  • [1]
    CRIOLLO L, MENA-ARCINIEGA C, and XING Shen. Classification, military applications, and opportunities of unmanned aerial vehicles[J]. Aviation, 2024, 28(2): 115–127. doi: 10.3846/aviation.2024.21672.
    [2]
    LYU Mingyang, ZHAO Yibo, HUANG Chao, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles for search and rescue: A survey[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(13): 3266. doi: 10.3390/rs15133266.
    [3]
    QU Chengyi, SORBELLI F B, SINGH R, et al. Environmentally-aware and energy-efficient multi-drone coordination and networking for disaster response[J]. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 2023, 20(2): 1093–1109. doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2023.3243543.
    [4]
    CEVIZ O, SEN S, and SADIOGLU P. A survey of security in UAVs and FANETs: Issues, threats, analysis of attacks, and solutions[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025, 27(5): 3227–3265. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2024.3515051.
    [5]
    OMOLARA A E, ALAWIDA M, and ABIODUN O I. Drone cybersecurity issues, solutions, trend insights and future perspectives: A survey[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35(31): 23063–23101. doi: 10.1007/s00521-023-08857-7.
    [6]
    杨勇, 王雪松, 张斌. 基于时频检测与极化匹配的雷达无人机检测方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2021, 43(3): 509–515. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200768.

    YANG Yong, WANG Xuesong, and ZHANG Bin. Radar detection of unmanned aerial vehicles based on time-frequency detection and polarization matching[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(3): 509–515. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200768.
    [7]
    江波, 屈若锟, 李彦冬, 等. 基于深度学习的无人机航拍目标检测研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524519. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24519.

    JIANG Bo, QU Ruokun, LI Yandong, et al. Object detection in UAV imagery based on deep learning: Review[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(4): 524519. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24519.
    [8]
    XIE Yuelei, JIANG Ping, GU Yi, et al. Dual-source detection and identification system based on UAV radio frequency signal[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2021, 70: 2006215. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2021.3103565.
    [9]
    ZHENG Haolin, GAO Ning, CAI Donghong, et al. UAV individual identification via distilled RF fingerprints-based LLM in ISAC networks[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2025, 14(11): 3769–3773. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2025.3603423.
    [10]
    MEDAIYESE O O, EZUMA M, LAUF A P, et al. Hierarchical learning framework for UAV detection and identification[J]. IEEE Journal of Radio Frequency Identification, 2022, 6: 176–188. doi: 10.1109/JRFID.2022.3157653.
    [11]
    唐智灵, 杨小牛, 李建东. 基于顺序统计的窄带通信辐射源指纹特征抽取方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2011, 33(5): 1224–1228. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2010.01058.

    TANG Zhiling, YANG Xiaoniu, and LI Jiandong. A novel method based on order statistics for extracting fingerprint of narrow band emitter[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2011, 33(5): 1224–1228. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2010.01058.
    [12]
    唐晓刚, 冯俊豪, 张斌权, 等. 基于射频指纹的卫星测控地面站身份识别方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2023, 45(7): 2554–2560. doi: 10.11999/JEIT220804.

    TANG Xiaogang, FENG Junhao, ZHANG Binquan, et al. Satellite telemetry track and command ground station identification method based on RF fingerprint[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2023, 45(7): 2554–2560. doi: 10.11999/JEIT220804.
    [13]
    吴一全, 童康. 基于深度学习的无人机航拍图像小目标检测研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(3): 30848. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30848.

    WU Yiquan and TONG Kang. Research advances on deep learning-based small object detection in UAV aerial images[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(3): 30848. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30848.
    [14]
    蒋伊琳, 尹子茹, 宋宇. 基于卷积神经网络的低截获概率雷达信号检测算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2022, 44(2): 718–725. doi: 10.11999/JEIT210132.

    JIANG Yilin, YIN Ziru, and SONG Yu. Low probability of intercept radar signal detection algorithm based on convolutional neural networks[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2022, 44(2): 718–725. doi: 10.11999/JEIT210132.
    [15]
    AL-SA’D M F, AL-ALI A, MOHAMED A, et al. RF-based drone detection and identification using deep learning approaches: An initiative towards a large open source drone database[J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2019, 100: 86–97. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.05.007.
    [16]
    赵慎, 李广选, 周鲜成, 等. 多无人机射频信号CNN| Triplet-DNN异构网络特征提取与机型识别[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2026, 48(3): 1230–1240. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250757.

    ZHAO Shen, LI Guangxuan, ZHOU Xiancheng, et al. Multi-UAV RF signals CNN| Triplet-DNN heterogeneous network feature extraction and type recognition[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2026, 48(3): 1230–1240. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250757.
    [17]
    聂伟, 戴琪霏, 杨小龙, 等. 基于多维信号特征的无人机探测识别方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(3): 1089–1099. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230302.

    NIE Wei, DAI Qifei, YANG Xiaolong, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle detection and recognition method based on multi-dimensional signal feature[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(3): 1089–1099. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230302.
    [18]
    聂伟, 张中洋, 杨小龙, 等. 基于梅尔倒谱系数的无人机探测与识别方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(4): 1076–1084. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241111.

    NIE Wei, ZHANG Zhongyang, YANG Xiaolong, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles detection and recognition method based on Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(4): 1076–1084. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241111.
    [19]
    田旭东, 白雪茹, 周峰. 基于稀疏自编码器的空间微动目标融合识别方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2023, 45(12): 4336–4344. doi: 10.11999/JEIT221163.

    TIAN Xudong, BAI Xueru, and ZHOU Feng. Fusion recognition of space targets with micro-motion based on a sparse auto-encoder[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2023, 45(12): 4336–4344. doi: 10.11999/JEIT221163.
    [20]
    YENDURI S, GUDAVALLI M, and C G. Optimal transport-based fusion of two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition[J]. Applied Intelligence, 2025, 55(7): 641. doi: 10.1007/s10489-025-06518-x.
    [21]
    HE Kaiming, ZHANG Xiangyu, REN Shaoqing, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 770–778. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
    [22]
    TAN Mingxing and LE Q V. EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks[C]. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Long Beach, USA, 2019: 6105–6114.
    [23]
    HOWARD A G, ZHU Menglong, CHEN Bo, et al. MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications[J]. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1704.04861, 2017. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1704.04861.
    [24]
    MA Ningning, ZHANG Xiangyu, ZHENG Haitao, et al. ShuffleNet V2: Practical guidelines for efficient CNN architecture design[C]. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Computer Vision–ECCV 2018, Munich, Germany, 2018: 122–138. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01264-9_8.
    [25]
    IANDOLA F N, HAN Song, MOSKEWICZ M W, et al. SqueezeNet: AlexNet-level accuracy with 50x fewer parameters and <0.5MB model size[C]. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, Toulon, France, 2017.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (24) PDF downloads(5) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return