Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
JIANG Wei-Jin, LIU Zhi-Hua, CUI Xin-Yu, XU Yu-Sheng, CHEN Shen-You, HU Jia-Long. FedFACO: Personalized Federated Learning Method Based on Fisher Information Matrix for Adaptive Aggregation and Client Collaborative Optimization[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260344
Citation: JIANG Wei-Jin, LIU Zhi-Hua, CUI Xin-Yu, XU Yu-Sheng, CHEN Shen-You, HU Jia-Long. FedFACO: Personalized Federated Learning Method Based on Fisher Information Matrix for Adaptive Aggregation and Client Collaborative Optimization[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260344

FedFACO: Personalized Federated Learning Method Based on Fisher Information Matrix for Adaptive Aggregation and Client Collaborative Optimization

doi: 10.11999/JEIT260344 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT260344
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772196), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2020JJ4249), Key Scientific Research Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (24A0446, 24A0753), Hunan Provincial Graduate Student Research Innovation Project (CX20251694)
  • Received Date: 2026-03-24
  • Accepted Date: 2026-07-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-07-09
  • Available Online: 2026-07-23
  •   Objective  Data heterogeneity under Non-Independent and Identically Distributed (Non-IID) settings remains one of the major challenges in Personalized Federated Learning (PFL) because it causes inconsistent local optimization, insufficient global knowledge transfer, and degraded personalization performance. To address these challenges, this paper proposes FedFACO, a personalized federated learning method based on the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM) for Adaptive Aggregation (AA) and Client Collaborative Optimization (CO). The proposed method improves model adaptation to heterogeneous client data distributions while preserving effective global knowledge sharing. By integrating AA with CO, FedFACO achieves a better balance between global generalization and local personalization in complex Non-IID environments.  Methods  FedFACO consists of two complementary components. First, the AA mechanism dynamically adjusts the fusion weights between the global and local models to generate personalized model initialization that better matches local data distributions. Second, the CO mechanism combines Parameter Alignment (PA) and Client Synchronization (CS). The PA strategy performs feature alignment and global regularization to strengthen global knowledge transfer while preserving local feature representations. The CS strategy uses FIM to quantify the information content of each client update and performs weighted aggregation to suppress low-quality updates. The proposed method is evaluated on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet datasets under Non-IID settings and is compared with representative baseline methods. Convergence behavior, robustness to stragglers, and resilience to low-quality updates are also evaluated.  Results and Discussions  Experimental results demonstrate that FedFACO consistently outperforms representative baseline methods on all four benchmark datasets, achieving an average accuracy improvement of approximately 3.1% over existing methods (Fig. 1 and Table 2). On the more challenging Tiny-ImageNet dataset, FedFACO reduces the total training time required for convergence by approximately 4.8% compared with the best-performing baseline (Table 3). Ablation experiments demonstrate that both AA and CO substantially improve performance, and their combined use achieves the highest accuracy (Table 6). Furthermore, the FIM-based CS strategy accurately quantifies the information content of client updates in straggler and asynchronous training scenarios, thereby improving aggregation reliability (Figs. 2 and 3). The proposed method also exhibits superior robustness in the presence of malicious clients (Fig. 4).  Conclusions  This paper proposes FedFACO, a personalized federated learning method for Non-IID environments based on FIM for AA and CO. The proposed method effectively balances global knowledge sharing and local personalization while improving training stability and robustness under heterogeneous client participation. Experimental results demonstrate its advantages in prediction accuracy, convergence efficiency, and robustness. Future work will investigate lightweight FIM approximation methods and adaptive triggering strategies to reduce computational overhead and integrate the proposed framework with privacy-preserving and security mechanisms for deployment in resource-constrained and high-security environments.
  • loading
  • [1]
    宁博, 宁一鸣, 杨超, 等. 自适应聚类中心个数选择: 一种联邦学习的隐私效用平衡方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(2): 519–529. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240414.

    NING Bo, NING Yiming, YANG Chao, et al. Adaptive clustering center selection: A privacy utility balancing method for federated learning[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(2): 519–529. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240414.
    [2]
    MCMAHAN B, MOORE E, RAMAGE D, et al. Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data[C]. 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Fort Lauderdale, USA, 2017: 1273–1282.
    [3]
    QUAN M K, PATHIRANA P N, WIJAYASUNDARA M, et al. Federated learning for cyber physical systems: A comprehensive survey[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2026, 28: 3751–3790. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2025.3570288.
    [4]
    蒋伟进, 崔新雨, 刘志华, 等. 基于可学习聚合权重的解析性联邦学习方法[J]. 计算机学报, 2026, 49(1): 84–108. doi: 10.11897/SP.J.1016.2026.00084.

    JIANG Weijin, CUI Xinyu, LIU Zhihua, et al. Analytical federated learning method based on learnable aggregation weights[J]. Chinese Journal of Computers, 2026, 49(1): 84–108. doi: 10.11897/SP.J.1016.2026.00084.
    [5]
    LI Tian, SAHU A K, ZAHEER M, et al. Federated optimization in heterogeneous networks[C]. 3rd Conference on Machine Learning and Systems, Austin, USA, 2020: 429–450.
    [6]
    WANG Kaidi, DING Zhiguo, SO D K C, et al. Age-of-information minimization in federated learning based networks with non-IID dataset[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2024, 23(8): 8939–8953. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2024.3357208.
    [7]
    LANG N, COHEN A, and SHLEZINGER N. Stragglers-aware low-latency synchronous federated learning via layer-wise model updates[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2025, 73(5): 3333–3346. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2024.3486979.
    [8]
    陈晓, 仇洪冰, 李燕龙. 边缘辅助的自适应稀疏联邦学习优化算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(3): 645–656. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240741.

    CHEN Xiao, QIU Hongbing, and LI Yanlong. Adaptively sparse federated learning optimization algorithm based on edge-assisted server[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(3): 645–656. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240741.
    [9]
    ZHANG Jianqing, HUA Yang, WANG Hao, et al. FedALA: Adaptive local aggregation for personalized federated learning[C]. 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, USA, 2023: 11237–11244. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v37i9.26330.
    [10]
    YANG Xiyuan, HUANG Wenke, and YE Mang. FedAS: Bridging inconsistency in personalized federated learning[C]. 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, USA, 2024: 11986–11995. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52733.2024.01139.
    [11]
    XU Dawei, LU Chentao, CHEN Tianxin, et al. Model layered optimization with contrastive learning for personalized federated learning[J]. Digital Communications and Networks, 2025, 11(6): 1973–1982. doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2025.08.011.
    [12]
    SONG Jiarui, SHEN Yunheng, HOU Chengbin, et al. FedAGHN: Personalized federated learning with attentive graph hypernetworks[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2025, 329: 114355. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2025.114355.
    [13]
    BINDER A, MONTAVON G, LAPUSCHKIN S, et al. Layer-wise relevance propagation for neural networks with local renormalization layers[C]. 25th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Barcelona, Spain, 2016: 63–71. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44781-0_8.
    [14]
    KIRKPATRICK J, PASCANU R, RABINOWITZ N, et al. Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(13): 3521–3526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1611835114.
    [15]
    MARTENS J and GROSSE R. Optimizing neural networks with Kronecker-factored approximate curvature[C]. 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France, 2015: 2408–2417.
    [16]
    HONARMAND M, MUTLU O C, AZIZIAN P, et al. Selective test-time domain adaptation using fisher information for robust facial expression recognition in-the-wild[C]. 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, Nashville, USA, 2025: 5800–5810. doi: 10.1109/CVPRW67362.2025.00579.
    [17]
    ROMANDINI N, MORA A, MAZZOCCA C, et al. Federated unlearning: A survey on methods, design guidelines, and evaluation metrics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2025, 36(7): 11697–11717. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3478334.
    [18]
    孙钰, 严宇, 崔剑, 等. 联邦学习深度梯度反演攻防研究进展[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(2): 428–442. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230541.

    SUN Yu, YAN Yu, CUI Jian, et al. Review of deep gradient inversion attacks and defenses in federated learning[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(2): 428–442. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230541.
    [19]
    WANG Ke, DIMITRIADIS N, FAVERO A, et al. LiNeS: Post-training layer scaling prevents forgetting and enhances model merging[C]. 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, Singapore, Singapore, 2025: 27100–27133.
    [20]
    ALLOUAH Y, GUERRAOUI R, GUPTA N, et al. Adaptive gradient clipping for robust federated learning[C]. 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, Singapore, Singapore, 2025: 84251–84295.
    [21]
    LECUN Y, BOTTOU L, BENGIO Y, et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86(11): 2278–2324. doi: 10.1109/5.726791.
    [22]
    KRIZHEVSKY A and HINTON G. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images[R]. 2009. (查阅网上资料, 未找到报告编号信息, 请补充).
    [23]
    LE Ya and YANG Xuan. Tiny imagenet visual recognition challenge[R]. CS 231N, 2015. (查阅网上资料, 未找到报告编号信息, 请确认).
    [24]
    HE Kaiming, ZHANG Xiangyu, REN Shaoqing, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 770–778. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
    [25]
    LIN Tao, KONG Lingjing, STICH S U, et al. Ensemble distillation for robust model fusion in federated learning[C]. 34th International Conference on Neural Information Processing System, Vancouver, Canada, 2020: 198.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (717) PDF downloads(24) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return