Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Tianyang, ZHANG Xiangrong, WANG Guanchun, TANG Xu. Cross-Domain Collaborative Enhancement for Tiny Object Detection in Remote Sensing Images[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260317
Citation: ZHANG Tianyang, ZHANG Xiangrong, WANG Guanchun, TANG Xu. Cross-Domain Collaborative Enhancement for Tiny Object Detection in Remote Sensing Images[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT260317

Cross-Domain Collaborative Enhancement for Tiny Object Detection in Remote Sensing Images

doi: 10.11999/JEIT260317 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT260317
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (62501433, 62506285, 62571387), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (QTZX25070), The Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2025JC-YBQN-795)
  • Received Date: 2026-03-18
  • Accepted Date: 2026-07-06
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-04-24
  • Available Online: 2026-07-19
  •   Objective  Deep learning has substantially advanced object detection in Remote Sensing Images (RSIs). However, because of imaging conditions and the inherently small size of many objects, a large proportion of targets in RSIs occupy fewer than 16 × 16 pixels. Therefore, current object detection methods achieve substantially lower detection accuracy for tiny objects than for normal-scale objects. This limitation primarily arises from two critical factors: insufficient positive sample assignment and weak feature representation. To address these challenges, a Cross-Domain Collaborative Enhancement Detector (CDCEDet) is proposed. CDCEDet jointly optimizes label assignment in the spatial domain and enhances feature representation in the frequency domain, thereby improving the accuracy and robustness of tiny object detection in RSIs.  Methods  The overall framework of CDCEDet is illustrated in Fig. 2 and consists of three major components. First, a Scale-Adaptive Anchor Generator (SAAG) is designed to dynamically generate anchors that match the scales of ground-truth (GT) objects, thereby effectively alleviating the scale mismatch between anchors and tiny objects that has been largely overlooked in previous studies. Compared with conventional uniformly distributed anchor generators, SAAG substantially increases the number of positive samples assigned to tiny objects, even under Intersection over Union (IoU)-based label assignment. Second, a Quantile-based Adaptive Label Assignment (QALA) mechanism is developed to replace the conventional fixed IoU threshold-based label assignment. QALA models the IoU distribution between each GT object and its matched anchors to generate an adaptive label assignment threshold for each object, thereby further increasing the number of positive samples assigned to tiny objects. Third, a Frequency-Adaptive Fusion (FAF) module is developed to enhance feature representation from a frequency-domain perspective. An adaptive high-pass filter is used to strengthen high-frequency details and compensate for information loss caused by channel compression, whereas an adaptive low-pass filter preserves semantic consistency during feature upsampling, thereby reducing semantic inconsistency within upsampled objects.  Results and Discussions  Extensive experiments are conducted on two public remote sensing tiny object detection datasets, AI-TODv2 and AI-TOD-R. The proposed method is compared with several state-of-the-art methods, including RFLA, DCNet, and DCFL. On the AI-TODv2 dataset (Table 1), CDCEDet improves AP50 and AP50–95 by 1.8% and 0.7%, respectively, compared with the best existing method. On the AI-TOD-R dataset (Table 2), AP50 and AP50–95 are improved by 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. These results demonstrate that CDCEDet achieves superior detection performance and strong generalization capability for tiny object detection in RSIs. Ablation studies and parameter analyses of the proposed modules (Tables 36) further verify the effectiveness of each component and their complementary contributions. Qualitative results on both datasets (Fig. 3) show that the proposed method accurately detects tiny objects in both sparse and dense scenes. As illustrated in Fig. 4, SAAG generates scale-matched anchors for individual objects and assigns substantially more positive samples to tiny objects than the conventional uniformly distributed anchor generator. Furthermore, visual comparisons with RFLA and DCNet (Fig. 5) demonstrate that CDCEDet achieves higher detection accuracy while substantially reducing missed detections.  Conclusions  A CDCEDet is proposed to address insufficient positive sample assignment and weak feature representation in remote sensing tiny object detection. Specifically, SAAG dynamically generates anchors that match the scales of GT objects, substantially increasing the number of positive samples assigned to tiny objects. QALA further improves label assignment by modeling the IoU distribution between GT objects and their matched anchors to adaptively determine the label assignment threshold, thereby effectively reducing the scale bias introduced by fixed IoU thresholds. In addition, FAF enhances feature representation from a frequency-domain perspective through an adaptive high-pass filter and an adaptive low-pass filter. Experimental results on two benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior detection performance and strong generalization capability of CDCEDet. Future work will focus on improving model efficiency and real-time performance to facilitate practical deployment in remote sensing applications.
  • loading
  • [1]
    邹旻瑞, 李宇轩, 戴一冕, 等. UMM-Det: 面向异构多模态遥感影像的一体化目标检测框架[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(12): 4704–4713. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250933.

    ZOU Minrui, LI Yuxuan, DAI Yimian, et al. UMM-Det: A unified object detection framework for heterogeneous multimodal remote sensing imagery[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(12): 4704–4713. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250933.
    [2]
    ZHANG Xiangrong, ZHANG Tianyang, WANG Guanchun, et al. Remote sensing object detection meets deep learning: A metareview of challenges and advances[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2023, 11(4): 8–44. doi: 10.1109/MGRS.2023.3312347.
    [3]
    XU Chang, WANG Jinwang, YANG Wen, et al. Detecting tiny objects in aerial images: A normalized Wasserstein distance and a new benchmark[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2022, 190: 79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.06.002.
    [4]
    FU Ronghao, CHEN Chengcheng, YAN Shuang, et al. Gaussian similarity-based adaptive dynamic label assignment for tiny object detection[J]. Neurocomputing, 2023, 543: 126285. doi: 10.1016/J.NEUCOM.2023.126285.
    [5]
    XU Chang, WANG Jinwang, YANG Wen, et al. RFLA: Gaussian receptive field based label assignment for tiny object detection[C]. The 17th European Conference on Computer Vision-ECCV 2022, Tel Aviv, Israel, 2022: 526–543.
    [6]
    LIN T Y, DOLLÁR P, GIRSHICK R B, et al. Feature pyramid networks for object detection[C]. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Honolulu, USA, 2017: 936–944.
    [7]
    刘杰, 刘书豪, 田明, 等. 复杂环境下无人机航拍小目标检测算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2026, 48(4): 1763–1773. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251126.

    LIU Jie, LIU Shuhao, TIAN Ming, et al. Small object detection algorithm for UAV aerial images in complex environments[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2026, 48(4): 1763–1773. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251126.
    [8]
    王坤, 丁麒龙. 利用自适应融合和混合锚检测器的遥感图像小目标检测算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(7): 2942–2951. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230966.

    WANG Kun and DING Qilong. Remote sensing images small object detection algorithm with adaptive fusion and hybrid anchor detector[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(7): 2942–2951. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230966.
    [9]
    WU Jixiang, PAN Zongxu, LEI Bin, et al. FSANet: Feature-and-spatial-aligned network for tiny object detection in remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5630717. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2022.3205052.
    [10]
    CHEN Linwei, FU Ying, GU Lin, et al. Frequency-aware feature fusion for dense image prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024, 46(12): 10763–10780. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3449959.
    [11]
    REN Shaoqing, HE Kaiming, GIRSHICK R, et al. Faster R-CNN: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(6): 1137–1149. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031.
    [12]
    WANG Jiaqi, CHEN Kai, YANG Shuo, et al. Region proposal by guided anchoring[C]. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, USA, 2019: 2960–2969. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00308.
    [13]
    MAGID S A, ZHANG Yulun, WEI Donglai, et al. Dynamic high-pass filtering and multi-spectral attention for image super-resolution[C]. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, Canada, 2021: 4288–4297. doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00425.
    [14]
    XU Chang, ZHANG Ruixiang, YANG Wen, et al. Oriented tiny object detection: A dataset, benchmark, and dynamic unbiased learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2026, 48(3): 3167–3184. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2025.3634161.
    [15]
    HE Kaiming, ZHANG Xiangyu, REN Shaoqing, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 770–778. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
    [16]
    LIU Dongyang, ZHANG Junping, QI Yunxiao, et al. Exploring lightweight structures for tiny object detection in remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 5623215. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3567345.
    [17]
    ZHANG Tianyang, ZHANG Xiangrong, ZHU Xiaoqian, et al. Multistage enhancement network for tiny object detection in remote sensing images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 5611512. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3363614.
    [18]
    HU Xinkai, REN Zhida, BHATTI U A, et al. DCEDet: Tiny object detection in remote sensing images based on dual-contrast feature enhancement and dynamic distance measurement[J]. Remote Sensing, 2025, 17(16): 2876. doi: 10.3390/rs17162876.
    [19]
    ZHANG Tianyang, ZHANG Xiangrong, HUA Chaozhuo, et al. Tiny object detection based on dynamic scale-awareness label assignment and contextual enhancement[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2026, 172: 112449. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2025.112449.
    [20]
    BIAN Jinghao, FENG Mingtao, DONG Weisheng, et al. Feature information driven position Gaussian distribution estimation for tiny object detection[C]. 2025 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, USA, 2025: 30376–30386. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52734.2025.02828.
    [21]
    DING Jian, XUE Nan, LONG Yang, et al. Learning RoI transformer for oriented object Detection in aerial images[C]. 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, USA, 2019: 2849–2858. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2019.00296.
    [22]
    XIE Xingxing, CHENG Gong, WANG Jiabao, et al. Oriented R-CNN for object detection[C]. 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), Montreal, Canada, 2021: 3520–3529. doi: 10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00350.
    [23]
    HAN Jiaming, DING Jian, XUE Nan, et al. ReDet: A rotation-equivariant detector for aerial object detection[C]. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Nashville, USA, 2021: 2785–2794. doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00281.
    [24]
    LI Wenting, CHEN Yijie, HU Xuankai, et al. Oriented RepPoints for aerial object detection[C]. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), New Orleans, USA, 2022: 1819–1828. doi: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00187.
    [25]
    ZENG Ying, CHEN Yushi, YANG Xue, et al. ARS-DETR: Aspect ratio-sensitive detection transformer for aerial oriented object detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 5610315. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3364713.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(5)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (367) PDF downloads(50) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return