Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Haotian, MA Zixian, XIE Xinhong, LI Nayu, LI Baozhu, SONG Chunyi, XU Zhiwei. A Closed-loop Feedback Adaptive Beam Alignment Algorithm for Shipborne Low Earth Orbit Satellite Communication Terminals[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251324
Citation: CHEN Haotian, MA Zixian, XIE Xinhong, LI Nayu, LI Baozhu, SONG Chunyi, XU Zhiwei. A Closed-loop Feedback Adaptive Beam Alignment Algorithm for Shipborne Low Earth Orbit Satellite Communication Terminals[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251324

A Closed-loop Feedback Adaptive Beam Alignment Algorithm for Shipborne Low Earth Orbit Satellite Communication Terminals

doi: 10.11999/JEIT251324 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT251324
Funds:  The Key R&D Program of Zhejiang Province (2024SSYS0095)
  • Received Date: 2025-12-15
  • Accepted Date: 2026-03-03
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-02-28
  • Available Online: 2026-03-14
  •   Objective  The 6G-based SATellite COMmunication (SATCOM) network has become a primary solution for ubiquitous and oceanic communications. Compared with traditional Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) satellites, the latest generation of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites offers higher throughput, lower end-to-end latency, and lower deployment cost. Phased arrays are therefore widely used in LEO SATCOM because of their beam agility. However, maritime wind-wave disturbances cause nonlinear relative motion between shipborne terminals and LEO satellites, which creates major challenges for high-precision satellite acquisition and tracking. To address this issue, a new beam alignment algorithm is required for LEO SATCOM systems. Such an algorithm should first obtain the instantaneous target state and motion characteristics through target acquisition, and then use a multi-target tracking method to predict satellite trajectories on the basis of the target states, thereby compensating for estimation errors caused by severe coupled motions.  Methods  The proposed closed-loop feedback adaptive beam alignment algorithm consists of two tightly coupled components: target acquisition and target state updating. In the target acquisition stage, a RAnk Reduction Estimator(RARE) is first used to decompose the array factor matrix and convert the original two-dimensional Direction Of Arrival(DOA) estimation problem into two sequential one-dimensional estimation problems. This process greatly reduces the computational complexity of each Sparse Bayesian Learning(SBL) iteration. On the basis of the coarse grid generated by RARE, an Adaptive Newton Sparse Bayesian Learning(ANSBL) method is developed. ANSBL uses block-sparse Bayesian learning to achieve initial target acquisition on the coarse grid, and then performs two-stage Newton refinement to reduce off-grid mismatch. This strategy provides high-accuracy DOA estimation in both $ \theta $ and $ \varphi $ and improves angular observation precision. In the target state updating stage, an Unscented Kalman Filter(UKF)-based ternary joint prediction mechanism is proposed. The UKF simultaneously predicts the target motion state, signal variance, and noise variance for the next target acquisition process. These predicted probability distributions are then used to update the initial grid and hyperparameters of the subsequent SBL acquisition stage, providing more consistent and comprehensive initial values. Through this closed-loop interaction, target acquisition and state tracking are deeply integrated, which substantially reduces the number of SBL iterations required for convergence. This advantage is particularly evident under high sea-state conditions, where reduced beam alignment time is critical.  Results and Discussions  The proposed closed-loop feedback adaptive beam alignment algorithm first uses on-grid DOA estimation to reduce array factor correlation and improve target acquisition efficiency, and then uses Newton iteration to achieve higher off-grid accuracy (Fig. 3). The proposed method is subsequently validated using real ship attitude data collected from a 28,000-DWT bulk carrier under actual sea conditions (Fig. 4). The UKF refines the DOA results through state updating. Its predictions of signal position, signal variance, and noise variance provide accurate initial values for the hyperparameters, thereby reducing the number of iterations and enabling faster convergence than other algorithms (Fig. 5). Under low sea-state conditions, the proposed method not only achieves satellite alignment in less than 0.2 s, but also reduces the satellite position estimation error from ±1°$ \sim $±0.5° (Fig. 6(a)). Under high sea-state conditions, the UKF effectively predicts satellite positions and reduces the satellite position estimation error from ±2.5°$ \sim $±0.65°, which verifies the robust tracking accuracy and error mitigation capability of the proposed method in harsh marine environments (Fig. 6(b)).  Conclusions  To meet the performance requirements of beam alignment algorithms for LEO communication satellites, this paper proposes a closed-loop feedback adaptive beam alignment algorithm. The algorithm first uses a block-based SBL algorithm to obtain grid-based DOA estimation results, and then achieves super-resolution direction estimation under off-grid conditions through adaptive Newton iteration. Through the UKF, the estimation results are dynamically calibrated in real time. The UKF further predicts the target motion state, signal variance, and noise variance for the next target acquisition process, thereby improving tracking continuity and alignment accuracy. Numerical simulations show that the proposed algorithm outperforms traditional beam alignment methods in both numerical accuracy and robustness, and effectively mitigates severe terminal shaking under complex sea conditions.
  • loading
  • [1]
    冯伊凡, 吴畏虹, 孙罡, 等. 天地一体化边缘计算网络服务迁移算法研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2026, 48(2): 499–511. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250835.

    FENG Yifan, WU Weihong, SUN Gang, et al. Service migration algorithm for satellite-terrestrial edge computing networks[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2026, 48(2): 499–511. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250835.
    [2]
    GUO Ningxuan, LIU Liang, and ZHONG Xiaoqing. Task-aware distributed inter-layer topology optimization method in resource-limited LEO-LEO satellite networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2024, 23(4): 3572–3585. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2023.3309379.
    [3]
    LIU Ying, ZHANG Wenbo, JIA Yongtao, et al. Low RCS antenna array with reconfigurable scattering patterns based on digital antenna units[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2021, 69(1): 572–577. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2020.3004993.
    [4]
    梁广, 龚文斌, 余金培. 基于子阵列的低轨星载多波束相控阵天线的设计与实现[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2010, 32(6): 1435–1440. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2009.00695.

    LIANG Guang, GONG Wenbin, and YU Jinpei. The design and implementation of sub-arrayed phased array antenna for LEO satellite[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2010, 32(6): 1435–1440. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1146.2009.00695.
    [5]
    WÜNSCHE R, KRONDORF M, and KNOPP A. Investigations of channel capacity loss in LEO satellite systems using phased array beamforming antennas[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2024, 60(4): 5373–5394. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2024.3392181.
    [6]
    LI Min, GAO Huiyan, LI Nayu, et al. A 17.7–19.2-GHz receiver front end with an adaptive analog temperature- compensation scheme[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2023, 71(3): 1068–1082. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2022.3215558.
    [7]
    LI Nayu, MA Zixian, XIE Xinhong, et al. A Ka-band 64-element four-beam phased array receiver with inter-beam interference cancellation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2025, 73(1): 221–233. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2024.3418879.
    [8]
    HONG Ru, QI Xiaokang, XIE Xinhong, et al. A dual-beam 256-element K-band Active phased array with reconfigurable polarization[J]. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2026. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2026.3661753.
    [9]
    MA Zixian, XIE Xinhong, LI Nayu, et al. Multibeam-assisted cross-polarization suppression with Ka-band 64-element four-beam reconfigurable phased array implementation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2025, 73(12): 10814–10826. doi: 10.1109/TMTT.2025.3612979.
    [10]
    XIE Xinhong, CHEN Haotian, MA Zixian, et al. A power-only fast calibration method for phased array using convolution neural network[J]. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 2024, 23(11): 3972–3976. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2024.3452268.
    [11]
    CHEN Haotian, XIE Xinhong, MA Zixian, et al. A novel fast far-field phased array calibration method utilizing deep residual neural networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2025, 73(4): 2217–2231. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2025.3547915.
    [12]
    TAIRA S, TANAKA M, and OHMORI S. High gain airborne antenna for satellite communications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1991, 27(2): 354–360. doi: 10.1109/7.78309.
    [13]
    CHEN Qin, XU Yuying, SONG Chunyi, et al. Adaptive tracking for beam alignment between ship-borne digital phased-array antenna and LEO satellite[J]. Journal of Communications and Information Networks, 2019, 4(3): 60–70. doi: 10.23919/JCIN.2019.8917886.
    [14]
    李卓. 面向复杂信号环境GNSS载波相位质量的深组合技术研究[D]. [硕士论文], 武汉大学, 2019.

    LI Zhuo. Research on deep integration technology for GNSS carrier phase quality in complex signal environment[D]. [Master dissertation], Wuhan University, 2019.
    [15]
    何红丽. 运动平台轨迹计算方法研究[J]. 国际航空航天科学, 2015, 3(2): 13–18. doi: 10.12677/JAST.2015.32002.

    HE Hongli. Study on trajectory algorithm of motion platform[J]. Journal of Aerospace Science and Technology, 2015, 3(2): 13–18. doi: 10.12677/JAST.2015.32002.
    [16]
    YUEN N and FRIEDLANDER B. Asymptotic performance analysis of ESPRIT, higher order ESPRIT, and virtual ESPRIT algorithms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 1996, 44(10): 2537–2550. doi: 10.1109/78.539037.
    [17]
    ZHANG Chen, ZHAO Minjian, and CAI Yunlong. Joint 2-D DOA estimation and mutual coupling calibration for uniform rectangular arrays[C]. 2015 International Conference on Wireless Communications & Signal Processing (WCSP), Nanjing, China, 2015: 1–5. doi: 10.1109/WCSP.2015.7340991.
    [18]
    GANGULY S, GHOSH J, MUKHOPADHYAY M, et al. Multi-time snapshot based off-grid DOA estimation of sparse array antennas using MFOCUSS algorithm[C]. 2020 URSI Regional Conference on Radio Science (URSI-RCRS), Varanasi, India, 2020: 1–4. doi: 10.23919/URSIRCRS49211.2020.9113604.
    [19]
    CHOO Y and YANG H. Broadband off-grid DOA estimation using block sparse Bayesian learning for nonuniform noise variance[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2022, 47(4): 1024–1040. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2022.3151949.
    [20]
    YANG Yang, CHU Zhigang, and PING Guoli. Two-dimensional multiple-snapshot grid-free compressive beamforming[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 124: 524–540. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.02.011.
    [21]
    DAI Jisheng, BAO Xu, XU Weichao, et al. Root sparse Bayesian learning for off-grid DOA estimation[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2017, 24(1): 46–50. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2016.2636319.
    [22]
    LIANG Guolong, LI Chenmu, QIU Longhao, et al. State-updating-based DOA estimation using sparse Bayesian learning[J]. Applied Acoustics, 2022, 192: 108719. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108719.
    [23]
    DING Yanwu, MINKLER C, and ZHANG Y D, et al. Single-satellite EMI geolocation via flexibly constrained UKF exploiting Doppler acceleration[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2025, 32: 11–15. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2024.3487778.
    [24]
    宋佳蓁, 师卓越, 张晓平, 等. 基于快速无迹卡尔曼滤波的雷达高速目标追踪技术[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(8): 2703–2713. doi: 10.11999/JEIT25001.

    SONG Jiazhen, SHI Zhuoyue, ZHANG Xiaoping, et al. Radar high-speed target tracking via quick unscented Kalman filter[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(8): 2703–2713. doi: 10.11999/JEIT25001.
    [25]
    JING Qianfeng, SASA K, CHEN Chen, et al. Analysis of ship maneuvering difficulties under severe weather based on onboard measurements and realistic simulation of ocean environment[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 221: 108524. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108524.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (95) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return