Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Ning, NIU Jinfa, WANG Weibin, HU Xingwang, WU Lin. Multi-projection Plane InISAR 3D Reconstruction Method for Complex Moving Ship Targets[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251268
Citation: LI Ning, NIU Jinfa, WANG Weibin, HU Xingwang, WU Lin. Multi-projection Plane InISAR 3D Reconstruction Method for Complex Moving Ship Targets[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251268

Multi-projection Plane InISAR 3D Reconstruction Method for Complex Moving Ship Targets

doi: 10.11999/JEIT251268 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT251268
Funds:  Natural Science Foundation of Henan under Grant (242300421170)
  • Received Date: 2025-12-01
  • Accepted Date: 2026-03-09
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-03-09
  • Available Online: 2026-03-16
  •   Objective  Interferometric Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar (InISAR) is a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction technique for non-cooperative targets. However, the complex 3D rotational motion of ship targets causes unstable Doppler frequency variation. Inverse Synthetic Aperture Radar (ISAR) imaging also inevitably suffers from target overlap and occlusion. These factors make high-precision and complete 3D reconstruction under a single projection plane difficult. Therefore, a multi-projection plane InISAR 3D reconstruction method for complex moving ship targets based on point cloud fusion is proposed. The method supplements target 3D information through efficient and high-precision point cloud registration and fusion, thereby significantly improving 3D reconstruction quality.  Methods  This method fully exploits the advantage of multi-plane observation enabled by the severe motion of ship targets. The ship centerline is extracted, and the vertical rotation vector is estimated by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to select the optimal imaging times corresponding to different Imaging Projection Planes (IPPs). ISAR imaging and InISAR 3D reconstruction are then completed. In addition, a point cloud fusion algorithm that combines Weighted Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) and hierarchical Iterative Closest Point (ICP) is proposed. The random sampling process is optimized through a feature stability weighting strategy, which enables efficient extraction and matching of corresponding feature points in InISAR images and achieves high-precision point cloud fusion under multiple IPPs.  Results and Discussions  Experimental results show that the proposed method significantly improves reconstruction accuracy and target completeness. For simulated ship point-target data, Fig. 7 shows excellent results, with a significant reduction in reconstruction error. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) analysis shows that the quality of 3D fusion imaging improves steadily as the SNR increases from –10 dB to 10 dB, and robust fusion performance is maintained even under low-SNR conditions. For simulated destroyer Radar Cross Section (RCS) data, the method achieves strong registration performance. The detail recovery and structural integrity of the fused image are also significantly improved, effectively addressing the incomplete reconstruction of 3D information caused by scattering-point overlap and occlusion.  Conclusions  To address the low reconstruction accuracy and information loss caused by target rotation, overlap, and occlusion in traditional InISAR methods for 3D reconstruction of complex moving ship targets, a multi-IPP InISAR 3D reconstruction method based on point cloud fusion is proposed. The method uses a PCA-based optimal imaging time selection strategy. Weighted RANSAC and hierarchical ICP algorithms are then applied to achieve efficient and high-precision registration and fusion of InISAR point clouds under multiple IPPs, thereby producing high-quality 3D reconstruction results. Multi-scenario experiments are conducted by constructing both a ship model with ideal scattering points and an electromagnetic simulation RCS model with occlusion effects. The results verify the accuracy of the proposed method under ideal conditions and demonstrate its applicability in complex real-world scenarios.
  • loading
  • [1]
    SOMMER A and OSTERMANN J. Backprojection subimage autofocus of moving ships for synthetic aperture radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2019, 57(11): 8383–8393. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2920779.
    [2]
    TIAN Biao, WU Wenzhen, LIU Yang, et al. Interferometric ISAR imaging of space targets using pulse-level image registration method[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59(3): 2188–2203. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2022.3209950.
    [3]
    GIUSTI E, GHIO S, MARTORELLA M, et al. Ship-borne 3D ISAR imaging[C]. The 2024 International Radar Conference (RADAR), Rennes, France, 2024: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/RADAR58436.2024.10993838.
    [4]
    HOU Kaifu, FAN Huayu, LIU Quanhua, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of target based on phase-derived technology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2025, 63: 4102612. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3541041.
    [5]
    HOU Xiyue, AO Wei, XU Feng, et al. End-to-end automatic ship detection and recognition in high-resolution Gaofen-3 spaceborne SAR images[C]. The 2019 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Yokohama, Japan, 2019: 9486–9489. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8900619.
    [6]
    ZHANG Yun, LI Long, LIAO Wangling, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of ship target on MEO SAR/ISAR hybrid imaging[C]. The IGARSS 2024–2024 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Athens, Greece, 2024: 3344–3347. doi: 10.1109/IGARSS53475.2024.10642865.
    [7]
    WANG Yu, LI Shuai, HE Tingting, et al. Three-dimensional point cloud reconstruction of inverse synthetic aperture radar image sequences based on back projection and iterative closest point fusion[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2023, 17(3): 503–521. doi: 10.1049/rsn2.12356.
    [8]
    RONG Jiajia, WANG Yong, and HAN Tao. Interferometric ISAR imaging of maneuvering targets with arbitrary three-antenna configuration[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2020, 58(2): 1102–1119. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2943613.
    [9]
    毕严先, 魏少明, 王俊, 等. 基于最小二乘估计的InISAR空间目标三维成像方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(5): 1079–1084. doi: 10.11999/JEIT151000.

    BI Yanxian, WEI Shaoming, WANG Jun, et al. Interferometric ISAR imaging for 3-D geometry of uniformly rotating targets based on least squares estimation method[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2016, 38(5): 1079–1084. doi: 10.11999/JEIT151000.
    [10]
    YIN Zhiping, ZHANG Dongchen, CHEN Weidong, et al. 3-D ISAR imaging reconstruction of non-uniformly rotating targets with FRFT technique[C]. The 2009 IET International Radar Conference, Guilin, China, 2009: 1–4. doi: 10.1049/cp.2009.0468.
    [11]
    WANG Yong and CHEN Xuefei. 3-D interferometric inverse synthetic aperture radar imaging of ship target with complex motion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(7): 3693–3708. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2806888.
    [12]
    汪玲. 逆合成孔径雷达成像关键技术研究[D]. [博士论文], 南京航空航天大学, 2006.

    WANG Ling. Study on key technologies of inverse synthetic aperture radar imaging[D]. [Ph. D. dissertation], Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006.
    [13]
    CAO Rui, WANG Yong, YEH C, et al. A novel optimal time window determination approach for ISAR imaging of ship targets[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2022, 15: 3475–3503. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3161204.
    [14]
    CAO Rui, WANG Yong, ZHANG Yun, et al. Optimal time selection for ISAR imaging of ship target via novel approach of centerline extraction with RANSAC algorithm[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2022, 15: 9987–10005. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2022.3220496.
    [15]
    WANG Yong and LI Xuelu. Three-dimensional interferometric ISAR imaging for the ship target under the bi-static configuration[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2016, 9(4): 1505–1520. doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2513774.
    [16]
    ZHANG Junqiu and WANG Yong. An optimal time selection method for 3-D imaging of ship targets via distributed InISAR[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2024, 21: 4014005. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2024.3436550.
    [17]
    SALVETTI F, GIUSTI E, STAGLIANÒ D, et al. Incoherent fusion of 3D InISAR images using multi-temporal and multi-static data[C]. The 2016 IEEE Radar Conference, Philadelphia, USA, 2016: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2016.7485133.
    [18]
    SALVETTI F, MARTORELLA M, GIUSTI E, et al. Multiview three-dimensional interferometric inverse synthetic aperture radar[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2019, 55(2): 718–733. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2018.2864469.
    [19]
    CAI J, MARTORELLA M, GUO J, et al. 3D ISAR imaging: Multi-view image fusion problem[C]. The IET International Radar Conference (IET IRC 2020), Chongqing, China, 2020: 1200–1204. doi: 10.1049/icp.2021.0620.
    [20]
    ZHANG Shuting, WANG Hongtao, WANG Cheng, et al. An improved RANSAC-ICP method for registration of SLAM and UAV-LiDAR point cloud at plot scale[J]. Forests, 2024, 15(6): 893. doi: 10.3390/f15060893.
    [21]
    HUANG Xuwei and HU Min. 3D reconstruction based on model registration using RANSAC-ICP algorithm[C]. The Transactions on Edutainment XI, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015: 46–51. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-48247-6_4.
    [22]
    EL BANANI M, GAO Luya, JOHNSON J, et al. UnsupervisedR&R: Unsupervised point cloud registration via differentiable rendering[C]. The 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, USA, 2021: 7125–7135. doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00705.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(11)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (432) PDF downloads(45) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return