Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YUAN Ye, HUANG Minshang, YANG Weifeng. Research on Ultrasound Imaging Algorithm Fused with Diffusion Model[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251083
Citation: YUAN Ye, HUANG Minshang, YANG Weifeng. Research on Ultrasound Imaging Algorithm Fused with Diffusion Model[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251083

Research on Ultrasound Imaging Algorithm Fused with Diffusion Model

doi: 10.11999/JEIT251083 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT251083
  • Received Date: 2025-10-13
  • Accepted Date: 2026-03-03
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-03-03
  • Available Online: 2026-03-15
  •   Objective   Medical ultrasound imaging, which utilizes ultrasonic waves to probe human tissues and generates images via signal processing of the returning echoes, has become a vital clinical diagnostic tool due to its non-invasive, safe, and real-time nature. However, conventional ultrasound imaging is fundamentally limited by factors such as the finite width of ultrasonic pulses, variations in tissue acoustic impedance, and the complexity of echo signals, leading to pervasive challenges including insufficient spatial resolution, significant speckle noise, and off-axis artifacts. These limitations directly impair the detection of lesions and diagnostic accuracy. While traditional approaches focusing on hardware optimization and signal processing algorithms like adaptive beamforming have made incremental improvements, they are often constrained by physical laws, computational complexity, and reliance on manual parameter tuning. Recent deep learning-based methods, particularly those using generative adversarial networks (GANs), offer promising results but suffer from training instability and poor interpretability. The emerging diffusion model, a state-of-the-art generative paradigm, has demonstrated superior robustness and generalization in computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reconstruction, yet its application in ultrasound imaging remains largely unexplored. This study aims to fill this critical gap by developing a novel diffusion model-based framework for high-quality ultrasound image formation, seeking to overcome the inherent limitations of existing methods and provide a stable, efficient, and interpretable solution for enhancing ultrasound image quality.  Methods   This research proposes a novel ultrasound imaging method based on a denoising diffusion probabilistic model (DDPM). The core of our approach is a multi-scale diffusion network architecture designed to progressively refine a low-quality ultrasound image (e.g., one formed by a simple Delay-and-Sum, DAS, beamformer) into a high-quality image. The process consists of a forward and a reverse process. In the forward process, Gaussian noise is gradually added to a high-quality ground-truth image over a series of timesteps. The reverse process is trained to learn the conditional denoising function. Our custom-designed denoising network takes a low-resolution DAS image as a conditional input and fuses it with the noisy image at each denoising step through residual connections and feature-wise transformations at multiple scales. This deep fusion mechanism allows the network to effectively incorporate the underlying anatomical structure from the low-quality input while iteratively removing noise and artifacts through the diffusion process. The model was trained using a dataset of paired low-quality and high-quality ultrasound images, with the high-quality images serving as the training target. The training objective was to maximize the variational lower bound on the likelihood, effectively teaching the network to reverse the noising process. The performance of the proposed method was quantitatively evaluated against traditional DAS, minimum variance (MV) beamforming, and a leading GAN-based super-resolution method using metrics including Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and Structural Similarity Index (SSIM).  Results and Discussions   The proposed diffusion model demonstrated superior performance in enhancing ultrasound image quality. Quantitatively, our method achieved a mean PSNR of 35.2 dB and an SSIM of 0.933, representing a significant improvement of 4.5 dB in PSNR while maintaining exceptional structural fidelity compared to conventional beamforming approaches. The method also consistently outperformed adaptive minimum variance beamforming and GAN-based approaches across all evaluation metrics, including contrast-to-noise ratio. Visual assessment confirms these quantitative findings. The generated images exhibit markedly reduced speckle noise and significantly enhanced boundary clarity of anatomical structures. Critically, these improvements were achieved without introducing the blurring or artificial textures commonly observed in other deep learning-based methods. The multi-scale architecture with conditional feature injection effectively preserved structural integrity, as evidenced by the clear and continuous edges in the output.The progressive denoising nature of our approach provides inherent interpretability to the image refinement process. Unlike the opaque single-step generation of other deep learning models, our method offers transparent, step-wise enhancement from initial input to final output. Furthermore, the training process remained stable and convergent, avoiding the instability issues that frequently plague adversarial training methods. Ablation studies confirmed the critical importance of the deep fusion mechanism, while resolution analysis verified substantial improvements in both lateral and axial resolution compared to all baseline methods.  Conclusions   This study successfully developed and validated a novel ultrasound imaging method based on a diffusion model. The proposed framework effectively addresses key limitations in conventional and existing deep learning-based approaches. It bypasses the complex matrix computations and manual parameter tuning required by adaptive beamformers and offers a more stable training paradigm compared to GANs. The results conclusively demonstrate that the method can significantly enhance image quality by substantially improving the PSNR and maintaining excellent structural similarity, leading to images with suppressed noise, reduced artifacts, and improved resolution. The multi-scale diffusion process ensures the preservation of anatomical structures while providing a degree of interpretability to the image generation process. This work establishes diffusion models as a powerful and promising new paradigm for advanced ultrasound imaging, offering a robust and high-performance technical pathway to break through the current bottlenecks in ultrasound image quality, with potential for broad clinical impact.
  • loading
  • [1]
    王浩, 李娟, 张远, 等. 医学超声成像技术的发展现状与挑战[J]. 中国医疗器械杂志, 2022, 46(5): 521–526. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.2022.05.009.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi与文献内容不符,请确认).

    WANG Hao, LI Juan, ZHANG Yuan, et al. Development status and challenges of medical ultrasound imaging technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Devices, 2022, 46(5): 521–526. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.2022.05.009.
    [2]
    ZHANG Yuhan, CHEN Lina, WANG Xiaoming, et al. Ultrasound image denoising based on wavelet transform and adaptive thresholding[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2021, 40(8): 2054–2065. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3071234.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [3]
    刘敏, 赵强, 孙伟. 超声成像中离轴伪影的产生机制与抑制方法[J]. 声学技术, 2023, 42(1): 89–95. doi: 10.16300/j.cnki.1000-3630.2023.01.015.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi与文献内容不符,请确认).

    LIU Min, ZHAO Qiang, and SUN Wei. Generation mechanism and suppression method of off-axis artifacts in ultrasound imaging[J]. Technical Acoustics, 2023, 42(1): 89–95. doi: 10.16300/j.cnki.1000-3630.2023.01.015.
    [4]
    CHEN Minjie, LI Yanping, ZHANG Hongwei, et al. Impact of ultrasound image quality on early liver lesion detection: A clinical study[J]. European Radiology, 2022, 32(6): 4123–4132. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08546-x.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [5]
    WANG Zhiqiang, LIU Jingwen, ZHANG Lei, et al. Design of a 128-element phased array probe for high-resolution ultrasound imaging[J]. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2021, 68(4): 1201–1210. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3052345.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [6]
    MORA P, CHEKROUN M, RAETZ S, et al. Nonlinear generation of a zero group velocity mode in an elastic plate by non-collinear mixing[J]. Ultrasonics, 2022, 119: 106589. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106589.
    [7]
    张克潜, 李德杰. 微波与光电子学中的电磁理论[M]. 2版. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2001: 210–215.

    ZHANG Keqian and LI Dejie. Electromagnetic Theory for Microwaves and Optoelectronics[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2001: 210–215.
    [8]
    JENSEN J A. Fundamentals of Medical Ultrasound[M]. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2018: 156–162. (查阅网上资料, 未找到本条文献信息, 请确认).
    [9]
    CAPON J. High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1969, 57(8): 1408–1418. doi: 10.1109/PROC.1969.7278.
    [10]
    JIANG Tao, ZHANG Yufei, WANG Ling, et al. Robust adaptive beamforming for ultrasound imaging under broadband signal conditions[J]. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2021, 25(9): 3345–3354. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3087643.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [11]
    HO D J, MONTSERRAT D M, FU Chichen, et al. Sphere estimation network: Three-dimensional nuclei detection of fluorescence microscopy images[J]. Journal of Medical Imaging, 2020, 7(4): 044003. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.4.044003.
    [12]
    CHEN Xin, WANG Hui, LIU Zhi, et al. Diagonal loading adaptive beamforming for ultrasound image quality enhancement[J]. Ultrasonic Imaging, 2022, 44(2): 89–102. doi: 10.1177/01617346211068234.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [13]
    赵鑫, 马晓伟, 刘杰. 自适应波束成形在超声成像中的应用进展[J]. 中国医学物理学杂志, 2023, 40(3): 301–307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2023.03.005.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi与文献内容不符,请确认).

    ZHAO Xin, MA Xiaowei, and LIU Jie. Application progress of adaptive beamforming in ultrasound imaging[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics, 2023, 40(3): 301–307. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-202X.2023.03.005.
    [14]
    LIU Yong, ZHANG Hui, WANG Zhijie, et al. End-to-end ultrasound image super-resolution using a modified U-Net[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2022, 41(5): 1123–1134. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3145678.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [15]
    BILLOT B, GREVE D N, PUONTI O, et al. SynthSeg: Segmentation of brain MRI scans of any contrast and resolution without retraining[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2023, 86: 102789. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102789.
    [16]
    ZHANG Cheng, JIANG Tao, LIU Jie, et al. Transformer-based ultrasound beamforming: A real-time implementation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2023, 70(2): 345–354. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3228976.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [17]
    李建峰, 张宇, 王莉, 等. 基于深度学习的超声图像伪影抑制算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(8): 2567–2575. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240512.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).

    LI Jianfeng, ZHANG Yu, WANG Li, et al. Ultrasound image artifact suppression algorithm based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(8): 2567–2575. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240512.
    [18]
    孙萌, 周明, 吴涛. 深度学习超声成像的可解释性研究进展[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2023, 40(2): 389–396. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202208052.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).

    SUN Meng, ZHOU Ming, and WU Tao. Research progress on interpretability of deep learning-based ultrasound imaging[J]. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 40(2): 389–396. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.202208052.
    [19]
    WANG Hong, LI Jun, ZHANG Ying, et al. GAN-based ultrasound image enhancement for breast lesion detection[J]. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2022, 98: 102185. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2022.102185.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [20]
    GOODFELLOW I J, POUGET-ABADIE J, MIRZA M, et al. Generative adversarial nets[C]. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2, Montreal, Canada, 2014: 2672–2680.
    [21]
    LIU Zhen, CHEN Guang, WANG Lin, et al. Stabilizing GAN training for medical image generation: A survey[J]. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 2023, 16: 234–250. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2022.3227890.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).
    [22]
    KIM T, LEE J, PARK S, et al. Diffusion model-based MRI reconstruction with reduced scan time[J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2022, 88(4): 1823–1835. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29203.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi与文献内容不符,请确认).
    [23]
    LIU Jiawei, ZHANG Hongliang, WANG Zhijie, et al. CT image artifact reduction using a diffusion model[J]. Medical Physics, 2023, 50(3): 1689–1700. doi: 10.1002/mp.16245.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi与文献内容不符,请确认).
    [24]
    赵阳, 陈曦, 刘浩. 扩散模型在医学影像重建中的改进与应用[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(2): 589–597. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250108.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi打不开,请确认).

    ZHAO Yang, CHEN Xi, and LIU Hao. Improvement and application of diffusion model in medical image reconstruction[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(2): 589–597. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250108.
    [25]
    陈阳, 李娜, 张伟. 扩散模型在医学影像领域的应用综述[J]. 自动化学报, 2023, 49(5): 921–938. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c220638.(查阅网上资料,未找到本条文献信息且doi与文献内容不符,请确认).

    CHEN Yang, LI Na, and ZHANG Wei. A review of diffusion models in medical imaging[J]. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2023, 49(5): 921–938. doi: 10.16383/j.aas.c220638.
    [26]
    杨磊, 宋昊, 申瑞阳, 等. 强稀疏低副瓣近场聚焦稀疏阵列三维成像[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(12): 4471–4482. doi: 10.11999/JEIT231278.

    YANG Lei, SONG Hao, SHEN Ruiyang, et al. High sparsity and low sidelobe near-field focused sparse array for three-dimensional imagery[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(12): 4471–4482. doi: 10.11999/JEIT231278.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (66) PDF downloads(27) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return