Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XIE Qingkun, XU Changzhi, BIAN Jingying, ZHENG Xiaosong, ZHANG Bo. Full Field-of-View Optical Calibration with Microradian-Level Accuracy for Space Laser Communication Terminals on LEO Constellation Applications[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250734
Citation: XIE Qingkun, XU Changzhi, BIAN Jingying, ZHENG Xiaosong, ZHANG Bo. Full Field-of-View Optical Calibration with Microradian-Level Accuracy for Space Laser Communication Terminals on LEO Constellation Applications[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT250734

Full Field-of-View Optical Calibration with Microradian-Level Accuracy for Space Laser Communication Terminals on LEO Constellation Applications

doi: 10.11999/JEIT250734 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT250734
  • Received Date: 2025-08-07
  • Accepted Date: 2025-11-05
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-11-05
  • Available Online: 2025-11-15
  •   Objective  The coarse pointing assembly (CPA) serves as a core component in laser communication systems, enabling wide-field scanning, active orbit-attitude compensation, and dynamic disturbance isolation. To counteract multi-source disturbances such as orbital perturbations and attitude maneuvers, it is essential to develop a high-precision, high-bandwidth, and fast-response pointing, acquisition, and tracking (PAT) algorithm. Establishing a full field-of-view (FOV) optical calibration model between the CPA and the detector is critical to suppress image degradation caused by spatial pointing deviations. Conventional calibration methods typically employ ray tracing to simulate beam offsets and infer calibration relationships. However, they exhibit several inherent limitations, including: high modeling complexity arising from non-coaxial paths, multi-reflective surfaces, and freeform optics; susceptibility to systematic errors due to assembly tolerances, detector non-uniformity, and thermal drift; limited applicability across the full FOV resulting from spatial anisotropy. To overcome these technical barriers and ensure stable and reliable laser communication links, a high-precision calibration method applicable over the entire FOV is urgently needed.  Methods  To achieve precise CPA-detector calibration and overcome the shortcomings of traditional methods, this paper proposes a full field-of-view optical calibration method with microradian-level accuracy. Based on the optical design features of periscope-type laser terminals, an equivalent optical transmission model of the CPA is established and the mechanism of image rotation is analyzed. Leveraging the structural rigidity of the optical transceiver channel, the optical transmission matrix is simplified to a constant matrix, yielding a full-space calibration model that directly relates CPA micro-perturbations to the spot displacements. By correlating the CPA rotation angles between the calibration target points and the actual operating positions, the calibration task is further reduced to estimating the calibration matrix at the target points. Random micro-perturbations are applied to the CPA, inducing corresponding micro-displacements of the detector spot. A calibration equation based on the CPA motion and spot displacement is formulated, and the calibration matrix is accurately estimated via least-squares regression. Finally, the full-space calibration relationship between the CPA and detector is derived through matrix operations.  Results and Discussions  Based on the proposed calibration method, an experimental platform (Fig. 4) is built to conduct calibration and verification using a periscope laser terminal. Accurate measurements of the conjugate motion relationship between the CPA and the CCD detector spot are obtained (Tab.1). To comprehensively assess the calibration accuracy and full-space applicability, systematic verification is executed, including single-step static pointing and continuous dynamic tracking. In the static pointing verification, the mechanical rotary table is moved to three extreme diagonal positions, and the CPA performs open-loop pointing based on the established CPA-detector calibration relationship. Experimental results confirm that the spot accurately reaches the intended target position (Fig. 5), with a pointing accuracy of less than 12μrad (RMS). In the dynamic tracking experiment, the system control parameters are optimized to ensure stable tracking of the platform beam. During the low-angular-velocity motion of the rotary table, the laser terminal maintains stable tracking (Fig. 6). The CPA trajectory exhibits a clear conjugate relationship with the rotary table motion (Fig. 6(a), Fig. 6(b)), and the tracking accuracy in both orthogonal directions is less than 4 μrad (Fig. 6(c), Fig. 6(d)). Furthermore, the independence of the optical transmission matrix from calibration target point selection is discussed. By improving the spatial accessibility of calibration points, this method reduces operational complexity without compromising calibration precision. Strategic optimization of the spatial distribution of calibration points further enhances calibration efficiency and accuracy.  Conclusions  This paper proposes a full field-of-view optical calibration method with microradian-level accuracy, based on single-target micro-perturbation measurement. To meet the engineering requirements of rapid linking and stable tracking, a full-space optical matrix model for the CPA-detector calibration is built via matrix optics. Random micro-perturbations applied to the CPA at a single target point yield a generalized transfer equation, from which the calibration matrix is determined by the least-squares estimation. Experimental results demonstrate that this model effectively mitigates issues such as image rotation, mirroring, and tracking anomalies, suppressing calibration residuals below 12 μrad across the entire FOV and limiting the dynamic tracking error to within 5 μrad per axis. The method eliminates the need for additional hardware and complex alignment procedures, providing a high-precision, low-complexity solution that supports rapid deployment in the mass production of Low-Earth-orbit (LEO) laser terminals.
  • loading
  • [1]
    KODHELI O, LAGUNAS E, MATURO N, et al. Satellite communications in the New Space Era: A survey and future challenges[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2021, 23(1): 70–109. doi: 10.1109/COMST.2020.3028247.
    [2]
    SINGYAP K and ALOUINI M S. Performance of UAV-assisted multiuser terrestrial-satellite communication system over mixed FSO/RF channels[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2022, 58(2): 781–796. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2021.3111787.
    [3]
    BRASHEARS T R. Achieving ⪆99% link uptime on a fleet of 100G space laser inter-satellite links in LEO[C]. Proceedings of SPIE 12877, Free-Space Laser Communications XXXVI, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2024: 1287702. doi: 10.1117/12.3005057.
    [4]
    许维翰, 周林杰, 陈建平. 硅基波导集成光学相控阵芯片—设计难点与突破(特邀)[J]. 光学学报, 2024, 44(15): 1513026. doi: 10.3788/AOS241072.

    XU Weihan, ZHOU Linjie, and CHEN Jianping. Silicon-based waveguide integrated optical phased array chips for LiDAR: Design challenges and breakthroughs (invited)[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2024, 44(15): 1513026. doi: 10.3788/AOS241072.
    [5]
    LI Jie, LUO Ming, HU Leilei, et al. Real-time 200Gbps coherent PON based on silicon photonic integrated transceiver[C]. 2022 Asia Communications and Photonics Conference, Shenzhen, China, 2022: 957–960. doi: 10.1109/ACP55869.2022.10088953.
    [6]
    HE Jingwen, DONG Tao, and XU Yue. Review of photonic integrated optical phased arrays for space optical communication[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 188284–188298. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3030627.
    [7]
    XUE Wenli, LIU Yichen, ZHU Xingwang, et al. A high-performance 10 mm diameter MEMS fast steering mirror with integrated piezoresistive angle sensors for laser inter-satellite links[J]. Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 2025, 11(1): 75. doi: 10.1038/s41378-025-00935-1.
    [8]
    WEN Zhidong, HOU Yu, CHEN Yang, et al. Improved acquisition performance of inter-satellite laser communication system through non-mechanical adaptive beam control[J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2025, 194: 109217. doi: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2025.109217.
    [9]
    李锐, 林宝军, 刘迎春, 等. 激光星间链路发展综述: 现状、趋势、展望[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2023, 52(3): 20220393. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20220393.

    LI Rui, LIN Baojun, LIU Yingchun, et al. Review on laser intersatellite link: Current status, trends, and prospects[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2023, 52(3): 20220393. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20220393.
    [10]
    GUELMAN M, KOGAN A, KAZARIAN A, et al. Acquisition and pointing control for inter-satellite laser communications[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2004, 40(4): 1239–1248. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2004.1386877.
    [11]
    侯霞, 刘哲绮, 常亦迪, 等. 卫星激光通信技术发展现状与趋势分析[J]. 中国激光, 2024, 51(11): 1101013. doi: 10.3788/CJL240448.

    HOU Xia, LIU Zheqi, CHANG Yidi, et al. Analysis on development status and trend of space laser communication technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2024, 51(11): 1101013. doi: 10.3788/CJL240448.
    [12]
    LIU Cheng, WEN Feng, and FAN Feng. Pointing, acquisition, and tracking (PAT) technology for inter-satellite laser links[C]. Proceedings of SPIE 13492, AOPC 2024: Laser Technology and Applications, Beijing, China, 2024: 134920C. doi: 10.1117/12.3046162.
    [13]
    NIELSEN T T. Pointing, acquisition, and tracking system for the free-space laser communication system SILEX[C]. Proceedings of SPIE 2381, Free-Space Laser Communication Technologies VII, San Jose, CA, USA, 1995. doi: 10.1117/12.207403.
    [14]
    FIELDS R, LUNDE C, WONG R, et al. NFIRE-to-TerraSAR-X laser communication results: Satellite pointing, disturbances, and other attributes consistent with successful performance[C]. Proceedings of SPIE 7330, Sensors and Systems for Space Applications III, Orlando, FL, USA, 2009: 73300Q. doi: 10.1117/12.820393.
    [15]
    CARRASCO-CASADO A, SHIRATAMA K, TRINH P V, et al. Development of a miniaturized laser-communication terminal for small satellites[J]. Acta Astronautica, 2002, 197: 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.05.011.
    [16]
    WANG Xuan, HAN Junfeng, WANG Chen, et al. Beam scanning and capture of micro laser communication terminal based on MEMS micromirrors[J]. Micromachines, 2023, 14(7): 1317. doi: 10.3390/mi14071317.
    [17]
    RÜDDENKLAU R, REIN F, ROUBAL C, et al. In-orbit demonstration of acquisition and tracking on OSIRIS4CubeSat[J]. Optics Express, 2024, 32(23): 41188–41200. doi: 10.1364/OE.537889.
    [18]
    ZHANG Furui, HAN Junfeng, and RUAN Ping. Beam pointing analysis and a novel coarse pointing assembly design in space laser communication[J]. Optik, 2019, 189: 130–147. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.05.079.
    [19]
    MILLER E D, DESPENZA M, GAVRILYUK I, et al. A prototype coarse pointing mechanism for laser communication[C]. Proceedings of SPIE 10096, Free-Space Laser Communication and Atmospheric Propagation XXIX, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2017: 100960S. doi: 10.1117/12.2264086.
    [20]
    谭立英, 吴世臣, 韩琦琦, 等. 潜望镜式卫星光通信终端的CCD粗跟踪[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2012, 20(2): 270–276. doi: 10.3788/OPE.20122002.0270.

    TAN Liying, WU Shichen, HAN Qiqi, et al. Coarse tracking of periscope-type satellite optical communication terminals[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2012, 20(2): 270–276. doi: 10.3788/OPE.20122002.0270.
    [21]
    张家齐, 张立中, 董科研, 等. 二次成像型库德式激光通信终端粗跟踪技术[J]. 中国光学, 2018, 11(4): 644–653. doi: 10.3788/CO.20181104.0644.

    ZHANG Jiaqi, ZHANG Lizhong, DONG Keyan, et al. Coarse tracking technology of secondary imaging Coude-type laser communication terminal[J]. Chinese Optics, 2018, 11(4): 644–653. doi: 10.3788/CO.20181104.0644.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(6)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (26) PDF downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return