Advanced Search
Volume 47 Issue 7
Jul.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIU Qiaoshou, DENG Yifeng, HU Haonan, YANG Zhenwei. Research on Resource Scheduling of Distributed CNN Inference System Based on AirComp[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(7): 2263-2272. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241022
Citation: LIU Qiaoshou, DENG Yifeng, HU Haonan, YANG Zhenwei. Research on Resource Scheduling of Distributed CNN Inference System Based on AirComp[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(7): 2263-2272. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241022

Research on Resource Scheduling of Distributed CNN Inference System Based on AirComp

doi: 10.11999/JEIT241022 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT241022
Funds:  The Major Project of Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJZD-M202400602, KJZD-K202200604), The General Project of Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX0731)
  • Received Date: 2024-11-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-03-16
  • Available Online: 2025-03-25
  • Publish Date: 2025-07-22
  •   Objective   In traditional AirComp systems, the computational accuracy is directly affected by the alignment of received signal phases from different transmitters. When applied to distributed federated learning and distributed inference systems, phase misalignment can introduce computational errors, reducing model training and inference accuracy. This study proposes the MOSI-AirComp system, in which transmitted signals in each computation round originate from the same node, thereby eliminating signal phase alignment issues.  Methods  (1) A dual-branch training model is proposed, increasing network complexity only during training. The traditional model is extended to a dual-branch structure, where the lower branch retains the original model, and the upper branch incorporates additional loss layers for training. (2) An MOSI-AirComp-based weight-power control scheme is introduced. Each node is equipped with multiple transmitting antennas and a single receiving antenna. Pre-trained model weights are offloaded to task nodes as part of the power control factor, which adjusts transmission power during inference. This optimization enhances signal amplitude for convolution operations while reducing computation time. Since data transmission originates from the same node, phase alignment issues are avoided. AirComp integrates signals from multiple antennas for convolution summation, enabling airborne convolution. (3) A TSP-based node selection algorithm is proposed, using weight mean and path as evaluation parameters to determine the optimal transmission path, ensuring efficient data transmission.  Results and Discussions  Compared to the traditional network model, the dual-branch training model significantly improves inference accuracy under small-scale fading. For the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, accuracy increases by 2%~18% and 0.4%~11.2% under different SNR values (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6). The MSE decreases by 0.056~0.154 and 0.047~0.23 under different maximum node power budgets (Fig. 7). In noise-only scenarios, inference accuracy improves by 0.7%~5.5% and 0.3%~7.1% under different SNR values (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6), while MSE decreases by 0.035~0.152 and 0.056~0.253 under different maximum node power budgets (Fig. 8).  Conclusions  An MOSI-AirComp system is proposed to address the phase alignment issue inherent in traditional AirComp scenarios. The system enables airborne convolution through a power control scheme and enhances the traditional network model with a dual-branch structure. The upper branch simulates multiplicative Rayleigh fading using loss layers and incorporates model data into the convolution layer output of the lower branch to simulate additive noise effects. To account for node limitations in IoT networks, a model-weight-improved Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) node selection algorithm is proposed. Future advancements in AirComp deployment for distributed computing and communication frameworks hold promise, particularly with the rapid development of 6G and IoT.
  • loading
  • [1]
    XIAO Jinjun, CUI Shuguang, LUO Zhiquan, et al. Linear coherent decentralized estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2008, 56(2): 757–770. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2007.906762.
    [2]
    GASTPAR M. Uncoded transmission is exactly optimal for a simple Gaussian "sensor" network[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2008, 54(11): 5247–5251. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2008.929967.
    [3]
    BUCK R C. Approximate complexity and functional representation[J]. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 1979, 70(1): 280–298. doi: 10.1016/0022-247X(79)90091-X.
    [4]
    GOLDENBAUM M, BOCHE H, and STAŃCZAK S. Nomographic functions: Efficient computation in clustered Gaussian sensor networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2015, 14(4): 2093–2105. doi: 10.1109/TWC.2014.2380317.
    [5]
    ABARI O, RAHUL H, and KATABI D. Over-the-air function computation in sensor networks[EB/OL]. arXiv: 1612.02307, 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.02307.
    [6]
    WANG Zhibin, ZHAO Yapeng, ZHOU Yong, et al. Over-the-air computation for 6G: Foundations, technologies, and applications[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2024, 11(14): 24634–24658. doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3405448.
    [7]
    LEE Chuangzheng, BARNES L P, and ÖZGÜR A. Over-the-air statistical estimation[J]. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 2022, 40(2): 548–561. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2021.3118412.
    [8]
    WANG Zhibin, ZHAO Yapeng, ZHOU Yong, et al. Over-the-air computation for 6G: Foundations, technologies, and applications[EB/OL]. arXiv: 2210.10524, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.10524.
    [9]
    SIGG S, JAKIMOVSKI P, and BEIGL M. Calculation of functions on the RF-channel for IoT[C]. 2012 3rd IEEE International Conference on the Internet of Things, Wuxi, China, 2012: 107–113. doi: 10.1109/IOT.2012.6402311.
    [10]
    CHEN Jiale, VAN LE D, TAN Rui, et al. Split convolutional neural networks for distributed inference on concurrent IoT sensors[C]. 2021 IEEE 27th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), Beijing, China, 2021: 66–73. doi: 10.1109/ICPADS53394.2021.00014.
    [11]
    MAO Jiachen, CHEN Xiang, NIXON K W, et al. MoDNN: Local distributed mobile computing system for Deep Neural Network[C]. Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Lausanne, Switzerland, 2017: 1396–1401. doi: 10.23919/DATE.2017.7927211.
    [12]
    SANCHEZ S G, REUS-MUNS G, BOCANEGRA C, et al. AirNN: Over-the-air computation for neural networks via reconfigurable intelligent surfaces[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2023, 31(6): 2470–2482. doi: 10.1109/TNET.2022.3225883.
    [13]
    ZENG Liekang, CHEN Xu, ZHOU Zhi, et al. CoEdge: Cooperative DNN inference with adaptive workload partitioning over heterogeneous edge devices[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2021, 29(2): 595–608. doi: 10.1109/TNET.2020.3042320.
    [14]
    FAN Shaoshuai, NI Wei, TIAN Hui, et al. Carrier phase-based synchronization and high-accuracy positioning in 5G new radio cellular networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 2022, 70(1): 564–577. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2021.3119072.
    [15]
    YOU Lizhao, ZHAO Xinbo, CAO Rui, et al. Broadband digital over-the-air computation for wireless federated edge learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2024, 23(5): 5212–5228. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2023.3304652.
    [16]
    DONG Ying, HU Haonan, LIU Qiaoshou, et al. Modeling and performance analysis of over-the-air computing in cellular IoT networks[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 2024, 13(9): 2332–2336. doi: 10.1109/LWC.2024.3407749.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(2)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (126) PDF downloads(16) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return