Advanced Search
Volume 47 Issue 7
Jul.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
HAN Chuang, LENG Bing, LAN Chaofeng, XING Bowen. Estimation Method of Target Propeller Parameters under Low Signal-to-noise Ratio[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(7): 2149-2162. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240790
Citation: HAN Chuang, LENG Bing, LAN Chaofeng, XING Bowen. Estimation Method of Target Propeller Parameters under Low Signal-to-noise Ratio[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(7): 2149-2162. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240790

Estimation Method of Target Propeller Parameters under Low Signal-to-noise Ratio

doi: 10.11999/JEIT240790 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT240790
Funds:  The National Natural Science Foundation of China (11804068), The Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2020F033), Heilongjiang Provincial Undergraduate Colleges and Universities Outstanding Young Teachers Basic Research Support Program (YQJH2024077)
  • Received Date: 2024-09-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-06-06
  • Available Online: 2025-06-24
  • Publish Date: 2025-07-22
  •   Objective  Accurate estimation of underwater propeller parameters—such as blade number, blade length, and rotational speed—is critical for target identification in marine environments. However, low Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) conditions, caused by complex underwater clutter and ambient noise, substantially degrade the performance of conventional micro-Doppler feature extraction methods. Existing approaches, including Fourier Transform (FT), wavelet analysis, and Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT), are limited in handling non-stationary signals and are highly susceptible to noise, leading to unreliable parameter estimation. To address these limitations, this study proposes a method that integrates Complex Variational Mode Decomposition (CVMD) for signal denoising with Orthogonal Matching Pursuit (OMP) for sparse parameter estimation. The combined approach improves robustness against noise while maintaining computational efficiency. This method contributes to advancing underwater acoustic target recognition in interference-rich environments and offers a theoretical basis for improving the reliability of marine detection systems.  Methods  The proposed method integrates CVMD and OMP to improve the estimation of propeller parameters in low-SNR environments. The approach consists of three sequential phases: signal decomposition and denoising, time-frequency feature extraction, and sparse parameter estimation. This structure enhances robustness to noise while maintaining computational efficiency. CVMD extends conventional Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) to the complex domain, enabling adaptive decomposition of propeller echo signals into Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) with preserved spectral symmetry. Unlike standard VMD, which cannot process complex-valued signals directly, CVMD treats the real and imaginary parts of the noisy signal separately. The decomposition is formulated as a constrained optimization problem, where IMFs are iteratively extracted by minimizing the total bandwidth of all modes. A correlation-based thresholding scheme is then used to identify and discard noise-dominated IMFs. The remaining signal-related IMFs are reconstructed to obtain a denoised signal, effectively isolating micro-Doppler features from background clutter. Time-frequency analysis is subsequently applied to the denoised signal to extract key scintillation parameters, including blade parity, scintillation intervals, and the maximum instantaneous micro-Doppler frequency. These parameters are used as prior information to constrain the parameter search space and reduce computational burden. Blade parity, inferred from the symmetry of the time-frequency distribution, narrows the candidate blade number range by half. Scintillation intervals and frequency bounds are also used to define physical constraints for sparse estimation. A sparse dictionary is constructed using Sinusoidal Frequency-Modulated (SFM) atoms, each corresponding to a candidate blade number. The OMP algorithm iteratively selects the atom most correlated with the residual signal, updates the sparse coefficient vector, and refines the residual until convergence. Incorporating prior information into dictionary design significantly reduces its dimensionality, transforming a multi-parameter estimation problem into an efficient single-parameter search. This step allows precise estimation of the blade number with minimal computational cost. Once the blade number is determined, the blade length and rotational speed are derived analytically using the relationships between the micro-Doppler frequency, scintillation period, and geometric parameters of the propeller.  Results and Discussions  The proposed CVMD-OMP framework demonstrates robust performance in propeller parameter estimation under low-SNR conditions, as verified through comprehensive simulations. The denoising efficacy of CVMD is illustrated by the reconstruction of distinct time-frequency features from heavily noise-corrupted propeller echoes (Fig. 10). By decomposing the complex-valued signal into IMFs and retaining only signal-dominant components, CVMD achieves a 12.4 dB improvement in SNR and reduces the Mean Square Error (MSE) to 0.009 at SNR = –10 dB, outperforming conventional methods such as EMD-WT and CEEMDAN-WT (Table 3). Time-frequency analysis of the denoised signal reveals clear periodic scintillation patterns (Fig. 11), which enable accurate extraction of blade parity and scintillation intervals. Guided by these prior features, the OMP algorithm achieves 91.9% accuracy in blade number estimation at SNR = –10 dB (Table 4). Accuracy improves progressively with increasing SNR, reaching 98% at SNR = 10 dB, highlighting the method’s adaptability to varying noise levels. The sparse dictionary, refined through prior-informed dimensionality reduction, maintains high precision while minimizing computational complexity. Comparative evaluations confirm that OMP outperforms CoSaMP and Subspace Pursuit (SP) in both estimation accuracy and computational efficiency. The execution time is reduced to 1.73 ms for single-parameter estimation (Fig. 15, Table 5). Parameter estimation consistency is further validated through the calculation of blade length and rotational speed. At SNR = –10 dB, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for blade length is 0.021 m, and 0.31 rad/s for rotational speed (Table 6). Both errors decrease significantly with improved SNR, demonstrating the method’s robustness across diverse noise conditions. The framework remains stable in multi-blade configurations, with extracted time-frequency characteristics closely matching theoretical expectations (Figs. 2 and 3). The integration of CVMD and OMP effectively balances accuracy and computational efficiency under low-SNR conditions. By leveraging prior-informed dimensionality reduction, the framework achieves a 90% reduction in computational load relative to conventional techniques. Future research will extend this framework to multi-target environments and validate its performance using real-world underwater acoustic datasets.  Conclusions  This study addresses the challenge of estimating underwater propeller parameters under low SNR conditions by proposing a novel framework that integrates CVMD and OMP. CVMD demonstrates strong capability in suppressing noise while preserving key micro-Doppler features, allowing reliable extraction of target signatures from severely corrupted signals. By incorporating time-frequency characteristics as prior knowledge, OMP enables accurate and efficient blade number estimation, substantially reducing computational complexity. The proposed framework shows high adaptability to varying noise levels and propeller configurations, ensuring robust performance in complex underwater environments. Its balance between estimation accuracy and computational efficiency supports real-time application in acoustic target recognition. The consistency of results with theoretical models further supports the method’s physical interpretability and practical relevance. Future work will extend this approach to multi-target scenarios and validate its effectiveness using experimental acoustic datasets, advancing the deployment of model-driven methods in real-world marine detection systems.
  • loading
  • [1]
    CHEN V C, LI F, HO S S, et al. Micro-Doppler effect in radar: Phenomenon, model, and simulation study[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2006, 42(1): 2–21. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2006.1603402.
    [2]
    CHEN V C. The Micro-Doppler Effect in Radar[M]. Boston: Artech House, 2011: 5–25.
    [3]
    CHEN V C, TAHMOUSH D, and MICELI W J. Radar Micro-Doppler Signature: Processing and Applications[M]. UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2014: 187–227.
    [4]
    TAHMOUSH D. Review of micro-Doppler signatures[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2015, 9(9): 1140–1146. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0118.
    [5]
    LI Yuxing and WANG Long. A novel noise reduction technique for underwater acoustic signals based on complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise, minimum mean square variance criterion and least mean square adaptive filter[J]. Defence Technology, 2020, 16(3): 543–554. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2019.07.020.
    [6]
    HUANG N E and SHEN S S P. Hilbert-Huang Transform and its Applications[M]. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 1998: 1–202.
    [7]
    夏赛强, 向虎, 陈文峰, 等. 基于CEMD的旋翼微动目标杂波抑制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(9): 322082. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22082.

    XIA Saiqiang, XIANG Hu, CHEN Wenfeng, et al. Clutter suppression method for rotor micro-motion target based on CEMD[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(9): 322082. doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.22082.
    [8]
    DRAGOMIRETSKIY K and ZOSSO D. Variational mode decomposition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2014, 62(3): 531–544. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675.
    [9]
    YANG Degui, LI Jin, LIANG Buge, et al. A multi-rotor drone micro-motion parameter estimation method based on CVMD and SVD[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(14): 3326. doi: 10.3390/rs14143326.
    [10]
    李中余, 桂亮, 海宇, 等. 基于变分模态分解与优选的超高分辨ISAR成像微多普勒抑制方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2024, 13(4): 852–865. doi: 10.12000/JR24043.

    LI Zhongyu, GUI Liang, HAI Yu, et al. Ultrahigh-resolution ISAR micro-Doppler suppression methodology based on variational mode decomposition and mode optimization[J]. Journal of Radars, 2024, 13(4): 852–865. doi: 10.12000/JR24043.
    [11]
    SAFFARI A, ZAHIRI S H, and KHISHE M. Automatic recognition of sonar targets using feature selection in micro-Doppler signature[J]. Defence Technology, 2023, 20: 58–71. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2022.05.007.
    [12]
    周毅恒, 杨军, 夏赛强, 等. 闪烁现象下旋翼目标微动参数估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2022, 44(1): 54–63. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.01.08.

    ZHOU Yiheng, YANG Jun, XIA Saiqiang, et al. Estimation method of micro-motion parameters for rotor targets under flashing[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2022, 44(1): 54–63. doi: 10.12305/j.issn.1001-506X.2022.01.08.
    [13]
    唐波, 谭思炜, 张静远. 水下声探测系统载体振动干扰分析及抑制方法[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2022, 44(6): 89–94. doi: 10.11887/j.cn.202206011.

    TANG Bo, TAN Siwei, and ZHANG Jingyuan. Vibration interference analysis of underwater acoustic detection system and its suppressing method[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2022, 44(6): 89–94. doi: 10.11887/j.cn.202206011.
    [14]
    周烨, 温玮, 韩建辉, 等. 基于声固耦合的水下复杂目标声散射研究[J]. 水下无人系统学报, 2020, 28(1): 51–56. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2020.01.008.

    ZHOU Ye, WEN Wei, HAN Jianhui, et al. Research on acoustic scattering of underwater complicated target based on sound-solid coupling[J]. Journal of Unmanned Undersea Systems, 2020, 28(1): 51–56. doi: 10.11993/j.issn.2096-3920.2020.01.008.
    [15]
    张天翼. 基于微多普勒的窄带雷达目标分类系统设计[D]. [硕士论文], 哈尔滨工程大学, 2019.

    ZHANG Tianyi. Design of narrow-band radar target recognition air target classification system based on micro-Doppler[D]. [Master dissertation], Harbin Engineering University, 2019.
    [16]
    任科. 基于窄带雷达的目标微多普勒特征提取研究[D]. [博士论文], 西安电子科技大学, 2021. doi: 10.27389/d.cnki.gxadu.2021.003236.

    REN Ke. Study on micro-Doppler feature extraction of targets based on narrowband radar[D]. [Ph. D. dissertation], Xidian University, 2021. doi: 10.27389/d.cnki.gxadu.2021.003236.
    [17]
    TANG Bo, ZHANG Linsen, and TAN Siwei. Parameter estimation of underwater propeller based on inverse Radon transform[J]. Journal of Measurements in Engineering, 2022, 10(4): 179–187. doi: 10.21595/jme.2022.22781.
    [18]
    XIA Saiqiang, YANG Jun, CAI Wanyong, et al. Adaptive complex variational mode decomposition for micro-motion signal processing applications[J]. Sensors, 2021, 21(5): 1637. doi: 10.3390/s21051637.
    [19]
    CUI Xiaolong, HUANG Jie, LI Chaoshun, et al. Three-dimensional instantaneous orbit map for rotor-bearing system based on a novel multivariate complex variational mode decomposition algorithm[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 178: 109211. doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109211.
    [20]
    TANAKA T and MANDIC D P. Complex empirical mode decomposition[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2007, 14(2): 101–104. doi: 10.1109/LSP.2006.882107.
    [21]
    张朝伟, 夏赛强, 杨军, 等. 低信噪比条件下直升机微动特征提取方法[J]. 雷达科学与技术, 2021, 19(6): 689–696. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2337.2021.06.007.

    ZHANG Chaowei, XIA Saiqiang, YANG Jun, et al. An extraction method for helicopter micro-motion features under low SNR[J]. Radar Science and Technology, 2021, 19(6): 689–696. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2337.2021.06.007.
    [22]
    杜立彬, 王政凯, 吕志超, 等. 基于辐射噪声特征的舰船目标识别分类方法综述[J]. 数字海洋与水下攻防, 2023, 6(5): 613–621. doi: 10.19838/j.issn.2096-5753.2023.05.012.

    DU Libin, WANG Zhengkai, LYU Zhichao, et al. A review of ship target recognition and classification methods based on radiated noise features[J]. Digital Ocean & Underwater Warfare, 2023, 6(5): 613–621. doi: 10.19838/j.issn.2096-5753.2023.05.012.
    [23]
    施晶, 朱明, 沈华, 等. 基于VMD和小波阈值的水听器信号去噪方法[J]. 传感技术学报, 2020, 33(7): 1003–1012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2020.07.013.

    SHI Jing, ZHU Ming, SHEN Hua, et al. Denoising method of hydrophone signal based on VMD and wavelet threshold[J]. Chinese Journal of Sensors and Actuators, 2020, 33(7): 1003–1012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2020.07.013.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(15)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (188) PDF downloads(30) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return