Advanced Search
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LV Zhuoyu, YANG Chao, SUO Chengyu, WEN Cai. A Deception Jamming Discrimination Algorithm Based on Phase Fluctuation for Airborne Distributed Radar System[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240787
Citation: LV Zhuoyu, YANG Chao, SUO Chengyu, WEN Cai. A Deception Jamming Discrimination Algorithm Based on Phase Fluctuation for Airborne Distributed Radar System[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT240787

A Deception Jamming Discrimination Algorithm Based on Phase Fluctuation for Airborne Distributed Radar System

doi: 10.11999/JEIT240787 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT240787
  • Received Date: 2024-09-12
  • Accepted Date: 2025-11-04
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-10-28
  • Available Online: 2025-11-13
  •   Objective   Deception jamming in airborne distributed radar systems presents a crucial challenge, as false echoes generated by Digital Radio Frequency Memory (DRFM) devices tend to mimic true target returns in amplitude, delay, and Doppler characteristics. These similarities complicate target recognition and subsequently degrade tracking accuracy. To address this problem, attention is directed to phase fluctuation signatures, which differ inherently between authentic scattering responses and synthesized interference replicas. Leveraging this distinction is proposed as a means of improving discrimination reliability under complex electromagnetic confrontation conditions.  Methods   A signal-level fusion discrimination algorithm is proposed based on phase fluctuation variance. Five categories of synchronization errors that affect the phase of received echoes are analyzed and corrected, including filter mismatch, node position errors, and equivalent amplitude-phase deviations. Precise matched filters are constructed through a fine-grid iterative search to eliminate residual phase distortion caused by limited sampling resolution. Node position errors are estimated using a DRFM-based calibration array, and equivalent amplitude-phase deviations are corrected through an eigendecomposition-based procedure. After calibration, phase vectors associated with target returns are extracted, and the variance of these vectors is taken as the discrimination criterion. Authentic targets present large phase fluctuations due to complex scattering, whereas DRFM-generated replicas exhibit only small variations.  Results and Discussions   Simulation results show that the proposed method achieves reliable discrimination under typical airborne distributed radar conditions. When the signal-to-noise ratio is 25 dB and the jamming-to-noise ratio is 3 dB, the misjudgment rate for false targets approaches zero when more than five receiving nodes are used (Fig.10, Fig.11). The method remains robust even when only a few false targets are present and performs better than previously reported approaches, where discrimination fails in single- or dual-false-target scenarios (Fig.14). High recognition stability is maintained across different jamming-to-noise ratios and receiver quantities (Fig.13). The importance of system-level error correction is confirmed, as discrimination accuracy declines significantly when synchronization errors are not compensated (Fig.12).  Conclusions   A phase-fluctuation-based discrimination algorithm for airborne distributed radar systems is presented. By correcting system-level errors and exploiting the distinct fluctuation behavior of phase signatures from real and false echoes, the method achieves reliable deception-jamming discrimination in complex electromagnetic environments. Simulations indicate stable performance under varying numbers of false targets, demonstrating good applicability for distributed configurations. Future work will aim to enhance robustness under stronger environmental noise and clutter.
  • loading
  • [1]
    张磊, 罗迎, 张群. 雷达组网系统对抗有源干扰方法综述[J]. 信息对抗技术, 2023, 2(6): 1–16. doi: 10.12399/j.issn.2097-163x.2023.06.001.

    ZHANG Lei, LUO Ying, and ZHANG Qun. Review of countermeasures against active jamming for radar network[J]. Information Countermeasure Technology, 2023, 2(6): 1–16. doi: 10.12399/j.issn.2097-163x.2023.06.001.
    [2]
    周生华, 刘馨, 黄经良. 雷达编码信号相位抖动抗主动欺骗干扰[J]. 信号处理, 2023, 39(2): 244–251. doi: 10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2023.02.006.

    ZHOU Shenghua, LIU Xin, and HUANG Jingliang. Anti-deception jamming based on signal phase jitter[J]. Journal of Signal Processing, 2023, 39(2): 244–251. doi: 10.16798/j.issn.1003-0530.2023.02.006.
    [3]
    GAO Jie, ZHU Shengqi, and LAN Lan, et al. Mainlobe deceptive jammer suppression with DEPC-MIMO radar with joint transmit-receive design[J]. Signal Processing, 2024, 219: 109424. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2024.109424.
    [4]
    ZHANG Jindong, ZHU Daiyin, and ZHANG Gong. New antivelocity deception jamming technique using pulses with adaptive initial phases[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2013, 49(2): 1290–1300. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2013.6494414.
    [5]
    LI Yachao, WANG Jiadong, WANG Yu, et al. Random-frequency-coded waveform optimization and signal coherent accumulation against compound deception jamming[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023, 59(4): 4434–4449. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2023.3243884.
    [6]
    崔国龙, 樊涛, 孔昱凯, 等. 机载雷达脉间波形参数伪随机跳变技术[J]. 雷达学报, 2022, 11(2): 213–226. doi: 10.12000/JR21189.

    CUI Guolong, FAN Tao, KONG Yukai, et al. Pseudo-random agility technology for interpulse waveform parameters in airborne radar[J]. Journal of Radars, 2022, 11(2): 213–226. doi: 10.12000/JR21189.
    [7]
    CUI Guolong, JI Hongmin, CAROTENUTO V, et al. An adaptive sequential estimation algorithm for velocity jamming suppression[J]. Signal Processing, 2017, 134: 70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.11.012.
    [8]
    ZHANG Shuai, YANG Ya, CUI Guolong, et al. Range-velocity jamming suppression algorithm based on adaptive iterative filtering[C]. 2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf), Philadelphia, USA, 2016: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2016.7485305.
    [9]
    SONG Lizhong, QIAO Xiaolin, MENG Xiande, et al. Study on the method of polarization suppression of cheating jamming in pulse Doppler radar[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2005, 16(2): 310–315.
    [10]
    李永祯, 申绪涧, 汪连栋, 等. 基于辅天线的有源假目标欺骗干扰的极化识别[J]. 信号处理, 2008, 24(1): 24–27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0530.2008.01.006.

    LI Yongzhen, SHEN Xujian, WANG Liandong, et al. Polarization identification algorithm of active-decoys and radar targets based on sidelobe-canceller antenna[J]. Signal Processing, 2008, 24(1): 24–27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0530.2008.01.006.
    [11]
    饶彬. 对抗条件下弹道目标的雷达跟踪技术研究[D]. [博士论文]. 国防科技大学, 2011.

    RAO Bin. Study on radar tracking technologies of ballistic targets in the presence of countermeasures[D]. [Ph. D. dissertation], National University of Defense Technology, 2011.
    [12]
    RAO B, ZHAO Y L, XIAO S P, et al. Discrimination of exo-atmospheric active decoys using acceleration information[J]. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 2010, 4(4): 626–638. doi: 10.1049/iet-rsn.2009.0033.
    [13]
    GRECO M, GINI F, and FARINA A. Combined effect of phase and RGPO delay quantization on jamming signal spectrum[C]. IEEE International Radar Conference, 2005, Arlington, USA, 2005: 37–42. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2005.1435790.
    [14]
    GRECO M, GINI F, and FARINA A. Radar detection and classification of jamming signals belonging to a cone class[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2008, 56(5): 1984–1993. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2007.909326.
    [15]
    张林让, 赵珊珊, 周宇, 等. 网络化雷达协同抗欺骗式干扰技术研究进展[J]. 数据采集与处理, 2014, 29(4): 516–525. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9037.2014.04.005.

    ZHANG Linrang, ZHAO Shanshan, and ZHOU Yu, et al. Research advance on cooperative anti-deception jamming in netted radar[J]. Journal of Data Acquisition and Processing, 2014, 29(4): 516–525. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9037.2014.04.005.
    [16]
    WANG Bing, CUI Guolong, ZHANG Shuai, et al. Deceptive jamming suppression based on coherent cancelling in multistatic radar system[C]. 2016 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf), Philadelphia, USA, 2016: 1–5. doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2016.7485304.
    [17]
    赵珊珊, 张林让, 刘楠, 等. 利用幅度比特征进行有源假目标鉴别[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 44(5): 51–57,152. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2017.05.009.

    ZHAO Shanshan, ZHANG Linrang, LIU Nan, et al. Active false-target discrimination method based on the amplitude ratio feature[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2017, 44(5): 51–57,152. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2017.05.009.
    [18]
    LIU Jieyi, GONG Maoguo, ZHANG Mingyang, et al. An anti-jamming method in multistatic radar system based on convolutional neural network[J]. IET Signal Processing, 2022, 16(2): 220–231. doi: 10.1049/sil2.12085.
    [19]
    ZHAO Shanshan, YI Minju, and LIU Ziwei. Cooperative anti-deception jamming in a distributed multiple-radar system under registration errors[J]. Sensors, 2022, 22(19): 7216. doi: 10.3390/s22197216.
    [20]
    陈金铭, 王彤, 吴建新, 等. 基于滤波器网格失配的分布式相参雷达目标参数估计方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(11): 2460–2470. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.11.09.

    CHEN Jinming, WANG Tong, WU Jianxin, et al. Target parameter estimation method for distributed coherent aperture radar based on grid mismatch filtering[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(11): 2460–2470. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.11.09.
    [21]
    TRETTER S. Estimating the frequency of a noisy sinusoid by linear regression (Corresp. )[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1985, 31(6): 832–835. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1985.1057115.
    [22]
    FRIEDLANDER B and WEISS A J. Eigenstructure methods for direction finding with sensor gain and phase uncertainties[C]. ICASSP-88. , International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, New York, USA, 1988: 2681–2684. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.1988.197201.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(15)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (87) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return