Design of Hardware IP Core Security Protection Based on Multi-Level Co-obfuscation

Huihong ZHANG; Jing LI; Qiufeng WU; Yuejun ZHANG; Pengjun WANG

doi:10.11999/JEIT210631

Volume 43 Issue 9

Sep. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Journal of Electronics & Information Technology > 2021 > 43(9): 2458-2465

Huihong ZHANG, Jing LI, Qiufeng WU, Yuejun ZHANG, Pengjun WANG. Design of Hardware IP Core Security Protection Based on Multi-Level Co-obfuscation[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(9): 2458-2465. doi: 10.11999/JEIT210631

Citation:

Huihong ZHANG, Jing LI, Qiufeng WU, Yuejun ZHANG, Pengjun WANG. Design of Hardware IP Core Security Protection Based on Multi-Level Co-obfuscation[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(9): 2458-2465. doi: 10.11999/JEIT210631

Citation:

PDF( 11249 KB)

Design of Hardware IP Core Security Protection Based on Multi-Level Co-obfuscation

doi: 10.11999/JEIT210631 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT210631

1.
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
2.
College of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (61874078, 61871244), The Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang (SJLY2020015), The S&T Plan of Ningbo Science and Technology Department (202002N3134), Ningbo Natural Science Foundation (202003N4107)

Received Date: 2021-06-28
Rev Recd Date: 2021-08-20

Available Online: 2021-08-24

Publish Date: 2021-09-16

Abstract

Abstract

Most of the reported hardware obfuscations are single-level ones focusing on physical level, logical level or behavior level, in which the lack of synergy among different levels commonly results in limited security performance. Based on study of the relationships among circuit layout, logic and states transition, a multi-level co-obfuscation scheme is proposed to protect hardware IP cores. In bottom-up collaborative confusion design, dummy vias are introduced into camouflage gates layout to perform physical-logic obfuscation, and via-PUF (Physical Unclonable Fuction) are utilized in state transition control to realize physical-behavior obfuscation. Then, in top-down collaborative obfuscation design, logic locks are used to perform behavior-logic obfuscation, and parallel-branch obfuscation wire technique is designed to complete the behavior-physical confusion. Finally, a substitution algorithm of the obfuscation gates into the circuit’s netlist is proposed, and the three-level cooperative obfuscation is realized to achieve IP core security protection. ISCAS-89 Benchmarks and a typical cryptogram algorithm are used to verify the correctness and efficiency of the proposed IP core protection scheme. The test results show that under TSMC 65nm process, the average area cost percentage of the proposed co-obfuscation in large-scale circuits is 11.7%, the average power consumption accounts for 5.1%, The difference of register toggle between correct and wrong keys is less than 10%, and the proposed scheme can effectively resist violence attack, reverse engineering, boolean SATisfiability (SAT) attack.
- Hardware security,
- IP core protection,
- Hardware obfuscation,
- Multi-level co-obfuscation

FullText(HTML)

References(14)

References

[1]	杨亚君, 陈章. 分块制造下硬件木马攻击方法及安全性分析[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报, 2019, 46(4): 167–175. YANG Yajun and CHEN Zhang. Hardware trojan attack methods and security analysis under split manufacturing[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2019, 46(4): 167–175.
[2]	GUIN U, HUANG K, DIMASE D, et al. Counterfeit integrated circuits: A rising threat in the global semiconductor supply chain[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2014, 102(8): 1207–1228. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2014.2332291
[3]	张跃军, 王佳伟, 潘钊, 等. 基于正交混淆的多硬件IP核安全防护设计[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(8): 1847–1854. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180898 ZHANG Yuejun, WANG Jiawei, PAN Zhao, et al. Hardware security for multi IPs protection based on orthogonal obfuscation[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(8): 1847–1854. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180898
[4]	DE A and GHOSH S. Preventing reverse engineering using threshold voltage defined multi-input camouflaged gates[C]. 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Technologies for Homeland Security, Waltham, USA, 2017: 1–6.
[5]	RAJENDRAN J, SAM M, SINANOGLU O, et al. Security analysis of integrated circuit camouflaging[C]. 2013 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer & Communications Security, Berlin, Germany, 2013: 709–720.
[6]	徐金甫, 吴缙, 李军伟, 等. 基于敏感度混淆机制的控制型物理不可克隆函数研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(7): 1601–1609. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180775 XU Jinfu, WU Jin, LI Junwei, et al. Controlled Physical unclonable function research based on sensitivity confusion mechanism[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(7): 1601–1609. doi: 10.11999/JEIT180775
[7]	孙子文, 叶乔. 利用震荡环频率特性提取多位可靠信息熵的物理不可克隆函数研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2021, 43(1): 234–241. doi: 10.11999/JEIT191013 SUN Ziwen and YE Qiao. Study on the physical unclonable function of the reliable information entropy extracted by the frequency characteristic of oscillating ring[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2021, 43(1): 234–241. doi: 10.11999/JEIT191013
[8]	ZHANG Jiliang, LIN Yaping, LYU Yongqiang, et al. A PUF-FSM binding scheme for FPGA IP protection and pay-per-device licensing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2015, 10(6): 1137–1150. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2015.2400413
[9]	ZHANG Jiliang and SHEN Chaoqun. Set-based obfuscation for strong PUFs against machine learning attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 2021, 68(1): 288–300. doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2020.3028508
[10]	DOFE J and YU Qiaoyan. Novel dynamic state-deflection method for gate-level design obfuscation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 2018, 37(2): 273–285. doi: 10.1109/TCAD.2017.2697960
[11]	KOUSHANFAR F. Provably secure active IC metering techniques for piracy avoidance and digital rights management[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2012, 7(1): 51–63. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2011.2163307
[12]	CHAKRABORTY R S and BHUNIA S. RTL hardware IP protection using key-based control and data flow obfuscation[C]. The 23rd International Conference on VLSI Design, Bangalore, India, 2010: 405–410.
[13]	YASIN M, MAZUMDAR B, RAJENDRAN J J V, et al. SARLock: SAT attack resistant logic locking[C]. 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust, McLean, USA, 2016: 236–241.
[14]	LI Liwei, WANG Pengjun, and ZHANG Yuejun. Design of anti-key leakage camouflage gate circuit for reverse engineering based on dummy vias[J]. Microelectronics Journal, 2019, 90: 163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.mejo.2019.06.006