Advanced Search
Volume 43 Issue 1
Jan.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Yongjian HU, Yifei GAO, Beibei LIU, Guangjun LIAO. Deepfake Videos Detection Based on Image Segmentation with Deep Neural Networks[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(1): 162-170. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200077
Citation: Yongjian HU, Yifei GAO, Beibei LIU, Guangjun LIAO. Deepfake Videos Detection Based on Image Segmentation with Deep Neural Networks[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2021, 43(1): 162-170. doi: 10.11999/JEIT200077

Deepfake Videos Detection Based on Image Segmentation with Deep Neural Networks

doi: 10.11999/JEIT200077
Funds:  The National Key R & D Program (2019QY2202), The International Cooperation Project of Guangzhou Development Zone (201902010028), The Sino Singapore International Joint Research Institute Project (206-A017023, 206-A018001), The Doctoral Research Project of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030310320), The Special Fund for Basic Scientific Research of Central University (2019MS025), The Department of Education of Guangdong Province Characteristic Innovation Project (2017KTSCX132)
  • Received Date: 2020-01-17
  • Rev Recd Date: 2020-07-10
  • Available Online: 2020-07-22
  • Publish Date: 2021-01-15
  • With the rapid development of deep learning technology, videos with changed faces generated by deep neural networks (i.e., Deepfake videos) become more and more indistinguishable. As a result, the threat raised by Deepfake videos becomes greater and greater. In literature, there are some convolutional neural networks-based detection algorithms for fake face videos. Although those algorithms perform well when the training set and the testing set are from the same dataset, their performance could deteriorate dramatically in cross-dataset scenario where the training and the testing sets are from different sources. Motivated by the fabrication course of fake face videos, this article attempts to solve the problem of fake faces detection with the way of image splicing detection. A neural network borrowed from image segmentation is adopted for predicting  the tampered face area from which a tampering mask is obtained through denoising and thresholding the probability map. Using the prior knowledge of face tampering that the changing of face mainly happens in face region, a new way is proposed to determine the Face-Intersection over Union (Face-IoU) and to further improve the ratio calculation method. The Face-Intersection over Union with Penalty (Face-IoUP) is used as the classification criterion for deepfake video detection. The proposed method is impletmented using three basic image segmentation neural networks separately and is tested them on datasets of TIMIT, FaceForensics++, Fake Face in the Wild(FFW). Compared with current methods in literature, the HTER (Half Total Error Rate) in cross-dataset test decreases significantly while the detection accuracy in intra-dataset test keeps high. For the Deep Fake Detection(DFD) dataset with higher synthesis quality, the proposed method still performs very well. Experimental results validate the proposed method and demonstrate its good generality.

  • loading
  • RÖSSLER A, COZZOLINO D, VERDOLIVA L, et al. FaceForensics++: Learning to detect manipulated facial images[C]. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, Seoul, Korea, 2019: 1–11. doi: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00009.
    KORSHUNOV P and MARCEL S. DeepFakes: A new threat to face recognition? Assessment and detection[EB/OL]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.08685, 2018.
    KHODABAKHSH A, RAMACHANDRA R, RAJA K, et al. Fake face detection methods: Can they be generalized?[C]. 2018 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group, Darmstadt, Germany, 2018: 1–6. doi: 10.23919/BIOSIG.2018.8553251.
    YANG Xin, LI Yuezun, and LÜ Siwei. Exposing deep fakes using inconsistent head poses[C]. ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Brighton, England, 2019: 8261–8265. doi: 10.1109/icassp.2019.8683164.
    MATERN F, RIESS C, and STAMMINGER M. Exploiting visual artifacts to expose deepfakes and face manipulations[C]. 2019 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops, Waikoloa Village, USA, 2019: 83–92. doi: 10.1109/WACVW.2019.00020.
    KORSHUNOV P and MARCEL S. Speaker inconsistency detection in tampered video[C]. The 26th European Signal Processing Conference, Rome, Italy, 2018: 2375–2379. doi: 10.23919/eusipco.2018.8553270.
    AGARWAL S, FARID H, GU Yuming, et al. Protecting world leaders against deep fakes[C]. The IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, California, USA, 2019: 38–45.
    HE Kaiming, ZHANG Xiangyu, REN Shaoqing, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition[C]. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, USA, 2016: 770–778. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90.
    CHOLLET F. Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions[C]. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, USA, 2017: 1251–1258. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2017.195.
    AFCHAR D, NOZICK V, YAMAGISHI J, et al. MesoNet: A compact facial video forgery detection network[C]. 2018 IEEE International Workshop on Information Forensics and Security, Hong Kong, China, 2018: 1–7. doi: 10.1109/WIFS.2018.8630761.
    TARIQ S, LEE S, KIM H, et al. Detecting both machine and human created fake face images in the wild[C]. The 2nd International Workshop on Multimedia Privacy and Security, Toronto, Canada, 2018: 81–87. doi: 10.1145/3267357.3267367.
    BAYAR B and STAMM M C. Constrained convolutional neural networks: A new approach towards general purpose image manipulation detection[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2018, 13(11): 2691–2706. doi: 10.1109/TIFS.2018.2825953
    GÜERA D and DELP E J. Deepfake video detection using recurrent neural networks[C]. The 15th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, Auckland, New Zealand, 2018: 1–6. doi: 10.1109/AVSS.2018.8639163.
    WANG Shengyu, WANG O, ZHANG R, et al. CNN-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now[EB/OL]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.11035, 2019.
    SHELHAMER E, LONG J, and DARRELL T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2017, 39(4): 640–651. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2572683
    CHEN L C, PAPANDREOU G, SCHROFF F, et al. Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation[EB/OL]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05587, 2017.
    毕秀丽, 魏杨, 肖斌, 等. 基于级联卷积神经网络的图像篡改检测算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(12): 2987–2994. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190043

    BI Xiuli, WEI Yang, XIAO Bin, et al. Image forgery detection algorithm based on cascaded convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(12): 2987–2994. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190043
    LI Haodong, LI Bin, TAN Shunquan, et al. Detection of deep network generated images using disparities in color components[EB/OL]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.07276, 2018.
    NATARAJ L, MOHAMMED T M, MANJUNATH B S, et al. Detecting GAN generated fake images using co-occurrence matrices[J]. Electronic Imaging, 2019(5): 532-1–532-7. doi: 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2019.5.MWSF-532
    杨宏宇, 王峰岩. 基于深度卷积神经网络的气象雷达噪声图像语义分割方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2019, 41(10): 2373–2381. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190098

    YANG Hongyu and WANG Fengyan. Meteorological radar noise image semantic segmentation method based on deep convolutional neural network[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2019, 41(10): 2373–2381. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190098
    高逸飞, 胡永健, 余泽琼, 等. 5种流行假脸视频检测网络性能分析和比较[J]. 应用科学学报, 2019, 37(5): 590–608. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2019.05.002

    GAO Yifei, HU Yongjian, YU Zeqiong, et al. Evaluation and comparison of five popular fake face detection networks[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2019, 37(5): 590–608. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0255-8297.2019.05.002
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(8)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (4056) PDF downloads(331) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return