高级搜索

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

SHAP可信阈值决策驱动的MOSFET剩余寿命预测研究

刘金凤 吴秋雪 HERBERTHo-Ching Iu

刘金凤, 吴秋雪, HERBERTHo-Ching Iu. SHAP可信阈值决策驱动的MOSFET剩余寿命预测研究[J]. 电子与信息学报. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251379
引用本文: 刘金凤, 吴秋雪, HERBERTHo-Ching Iu. SHAP可信阈值决策驱动的MOSFET剩余寿命预测研究[J]. 电子与信息学报. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251379
LIU Jinfeng, WU Qiuxue, HERBERT Ho-Ching Iu. SHAP-based Reliable Threshold Decision-driven Remaining Useful Life Prediction for MOSFETs[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251379
Citation: LIU Jinfeng, WU Qiuxue, HERBERT Ho-Ching Iu. SHAP-based Reliable Threshold Decision-driven Remaining Useful Life Prediction for MOSFETs[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology. doi: 10.11999/JEIT251379

SHAP可信阈值决策驱动的MOSFET剩余寿命预测研究

doi: 10.11999/JEIT251379 cstr: 32379.14.JEIT251379
基金项目: 黑龙江省自然科学基金(LH2023E086)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘金凤:女,副教授,研究方向为电力电子器件驱动控制、分布式控制、智能控制策略研究

    吴秋雪:女,硕士生,研究方向为功率MOSFET阈值划分与寿命预测

    HERBERTHo-Ching Iu:男,教授,研究方向为功率器件驱动控制、忆阻器建模与逻辑电路应用

    通讯作者:

    吴秋雪 wqxwqx6666@163.com

  • 中图分类号: TN386.1

SHAP-based Reliable Threshold Decision-driven Remaining Useful Life Prediction for MOSFETs

Funds: The Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (LH2023E086)
  • 摘要: 针对功率MOSFET传统固定阈值预警法与物理失效机理脱节的问题,该文提出一种融合可解释人工智能(XAI)的寿命预测框架。首先,设计一种自适应双阈值划分策略,融合K-means聚类与近端策略优化(PPO)算法;该策略以聚类获得的初始解为搜索起点,构建兼顾区间比例、状态转移灵敏度激励及阈值间距惩罚的多目标奖励函数,引导智能体优化阈值,实现退化阶段的精准划分。其次,为增强对黑盒决策过程的理解,引入SHAP可解释性分析,从特征与机理关联层面验证阈值决策的合理性。分析表明,低阈值由健康期稳态特征主导,满足安全基线要求;高阈值则由后期加速退化动力学特征主导,精准定位临界点,该分析证实了阈值决策的可信性与透明性。在此基础上,当退化数据超越可信低阈值时触发预警机制,并采用结合残差连接的堆叠门控循环单元(R-SGRU)进行剩余寿命预测。在NASA数据集上的实验表明,该模型预测性能显著优于长短期记忆网络(LSTM)和时间卷积网络(TCN)等多种模型,测试集MSE低于0.001 5R2高于0.98。该研究不仅为MOSFET早期预警提供了精确可靠的决策支持,更通过可解释技术建立了数据特征与物理机理的关联,推动了人工智能在器件预测领域向可信、可靠方向发展。
  • 图  1  预处理流程图

    图  2  功率MOSFET退化失效曲线图

    图  3  阈值划分整体流程图

    图  4  PPO阈值优化流程图

    图  5  PPO阈值优化结果图

    图  6  低阈值SHAP分析结果图

    图  7  高阈值SHAP分析结果图

    图  8  网络结构图

    图  9  预测结果对比图

    表  1  阈值性能对比表

    划分方法MSER2预警比例(%)
    固定阈值0.0019870.97605116.23
    K-means0.0019530.9778378.35
    变化点0.0015990.9784078.32
    分位数0.0016980.97737820.05
    贝叶斯优化0.0015530.97895026.37
    PPO0.001500.98389115.68
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  低阈值SHAP分析全局重要性表

    特征SHAP值
    初始波动0.001315
    首次偏离点0.000960
    前期斜率0.000898
    前期均值0.000847
    曲线曲率0.000545
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  高阈值SHAP分析全局重要性表

    特征SHAP值
    后期斜率0.001333
    后期均值0.000778
    加速拐点0.000701
    首次偏离点0.000650
    突变点数量0.000440
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  模型消融实验精度对比

    方法MSER2训练时间(s)预警准确率(%)
    GRU0.0016220.97584659.6193.56
    SGRU0.0016750.977097158.3094.97
    R-SGRU0.00150.983891167.6495.11
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  多种预测方法精度对比

    方法MSER2训练时间(s)预警准确率(%)
    LSTM0.0021270.96715256.6994.82
    BiLSTM0.0016880.971866102.0294.88
    TCN0.0016950.971414463.9693.21
    Transformer0.0015980.974956531.9494.03
    本文方法0.00150.983891167.6495.11
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  器件剩余寿命预测误差对比(min)

    器件低阈值实际剩余寿命预测剩余寿命误差
    8号95.232.432.10.3
    9号106.683.784.10.4
    12号112.675.375.60.3
    14号58.660.260.40.2
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  模型跨器件泛化性能验证结果

    测试器件训练器件MSER²
    8号9,12,14号0.0055480.93
    9号8,12,14号0.0081450.90
    12号8,9,14号0.0042570.94
    14号8,9,12号0.0093480.89
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  8  模型在不同退化阶段的预测性能

    训练数据比例(%)MSER²
    400.0166410.872
    500.0096040.911
    600.0044890.943
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] ZHANG Yingying, WANG Xinpeng, and FENG Nianqiao. The path of green finance to promote the realization of low-carbon economic transformation under the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals: Theoretical model and empirical analysis[J]. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, 94: 103227. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103227.
    [2] PICOT-DIGOIX M, RICHARDEAU F, BLAQUIÈRE J M, et al. Gate voltage dip as a new indicator for online health monitoring of SiC MOSFETS[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2025, 40(1): 142–145. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2024.3476553.
    [3] GAO Le, LIU Chaoming, XIAO Yiping, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of power electronic devices with physics-informed deep learning and sparse data[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2025, 40(11): 16068–16073. doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2025.3563853.
    [4] LI Xu, DENG Xiaochuan, LIAO Zhengxiang, et al. Failure mechanism of 1200-V SiC MOSFET with embedded Schottky barrier diode under short-circuit condition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 2025, 72(3): 1259–1263. doi: 10.1109/TED.2024.3524371.
    [5] 石欣, 张夏恒, 朱雅亲, 等. 基于VMD-NARX的MOSFET剩余使用寿命预测方法[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2023, 44(9): 275–286. doi: 10.19650/j.cnki.cjsi.J2311277.

    SHI Xin, ZHANG Xiaheng, ZHU Yaqin, et al. Method for predicting the remaining useful life of MOSFETs based on VMD-NARX[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2023, 44(9): 275–286. doi: 10.19650/j.cnki.cjsi.J2311277.
    [6] 张明宇, 王琦, 于洋. 基于LSTM-DHMM的MOSFET器件健康状态识别与故障时间预测[J]. 电子学报, 2022, 50(3): 643–651. doi: 10.12263/DZXB.20210047.

    ZHANG Mingyu, WANG Qi, and YU Yang. Health status identification and fault time prediction of MOSFET device based on LSTM-DHMM[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2022, 50(3): 643–651. doi: 10.12263/DZXB.20210047.
    [7] 拓云天. 基于维纳过程的组件分阶段剩余寿命预测方法研究[D]. [硕士论文], 中北大学, 2023.

    TUO Yuntian. Research on staged remaining useful life prediction method of components based on wiener process[D]. [Master dissertation], North University of China, 2023.
    [8] 罗妍, 王枞, 叶文玲. 基于XGBoost和SHAP的急性肾损伤可解释预测模型[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2022, 44(1): 27–38. doi: 10.11999/JEIT210931.

    LUO Yan, WANG Cong, and YE Wenling. An interpretable prediction model for acute kidney injury based on XGBoost and SHAP[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2022, 44(1): 27–38. doi: 10.11999/JEIT210931.
    [9] LI Yang, LIU Zhenbao, JIA Zhen, et al. Fault diagnosis strategy for flight control rudder circuit based on SHAP interpretable analysis optimization transformer with attention mechanism[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2024, 73: 3534214. doi: 10.1109/TIM.2024.3470041.
    [10] ALOMARI Y and ANDÓ M. SHAP-based insights for aerospace PHM: Temporal feature importance, dependencies, robustness, and interaction analysis[J]. Results in Engineering, 2024, 21: 101834. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101834.
    [11] CELAYA J R, SAXENA A, SAHA S, et al. Prognostics of power MOSFETs under thermal stress accelerated aging using data-driven and model-based methodologies[C]. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 2011. doi: 10.36001/PHMCONF.2011.V3I1.1995.
    [12] VIJAY J, VAISHNAVI S, and PRABHAKAR V. Enhancing wave parameters prediction: Machine learning models combined with PCHIP[J]. Ocean Dynamics, 2025, 75(12): 101. doi: 10.1007/s10236-025-01748-6.
    [13] CHEN Yanlu, HU Lei, HU Niaoqing, et al. A synchrosqueezed transform method based on fast kurtogram and demodulation and piecewise aggregate approximation for bearing fault diagnosis[J]. Sensors, 2024, 24(8): 2502. doi: 10.3390/s24082502.
    [14] 谭国平, 易文雄, 周思源, 等. 无人机辅助MEC车辆任务卸载与功率控制近端策略优化算法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2024, 46(6): 2361–2371. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230770.

    TAN Guoping, YI Wenxiong, ZHOU Siyuan, et al. Proximal policy optimization algorithm for UAV-assisted MEC vehicle task offloading and power control[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2024, 46(6): 2361–2371. doi: 10.11999/JEIT230770.
    [15] VAN DEN BROECK G, LYKOV A, SCHLEICH M, et al. On the tractability of SHAP explanations[J]. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2022, 74: 851–886. doi: 10.1613/jair.1.13283.
    [16] 张红, 伊敏, 张玺君, 等. 长期Transformer和自适应傅里叶变换的动态图卷积交通流预测研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2025, 47(7): 2249–2262. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241076.

    ZHANG Hong, YI Min, ZHANG Xijun, et al. Long-term transformer and adaptive fourier transform for dynamic graph convolutional traffic flow prediction study[J]. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 2025, 47(7): 2249–2262. doi: 10.11999/JEIT241076.
  • 加载中
图(9) / 表(8)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  7
  • HTML全文浏览量:  4
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-12-30
  • 修回日期:  2026-04-20
  • 录用日期:  2026-04-23
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-05-13

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回