导航接收机跟踪环路电磁干扰的预测方法研究

张庆龙; 王玉明; 程二威; 陈亚洲; 马立云; 张喆

doi:10.11999/JEIT200895

导航接收机跟踪环路电磁干扰的预测方法研究

doi: 10.11999/JEIT200895

张庆龙^{1, 2},
王玉明¹,
程二威¹,
陈亚洲^1, ,,
马立云¹,
张喆²

1.
陆军工程大学石家庄校区电磁环境效应国防重点试验室石家庄 050003
2.
海军航空大学第二飞行训练基地长治 046000

详细信息

作者简介:
张庆龙：男，1987年生，博士生，研究方向为电磁环境效应与防护

王玉明：女，1980年生，讲师，研究方向为电磁兼容与电磁防护

程二威：男，1983年生，副教授，研究方向为电磁环境模拟与测试技术

陈亚洲：男，1975年生，教授，研究方向为强电磁环境模拟/电磁环境效应与防护

马立云：女，1984年生，讲师，研究方向为电磁兼容与电磁防护

张喆：男，1988年生，助理工程师，研究方向为电子通信

通讯作者:
陈亚洲　chen_yazhou@sina.com

中图分类号: TN97
计量
- 文章访问数: 555
- HTML全文浏览量: 200
- PDF下载量: 60
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-10-19
- 修回日期: 2021-03-15
- 网络出版日期: 2021-03-29
- 刊出日期: 2021-12-21

Investigation on Prediction Method of Electromagnetic Interference in the Tracking Loop of Navigation Receiver

1.
National Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Environment Effects, Army Engineering University Shijiazhuang Campus, Shijiazhuang 050003, China
2.
The Second Flight Training Base, Naval Aeronautical University, Changzhi 046000, China

摘要

摘要: 针对复杂战场电磁环境下，导航接收机因电磁干扰而引起内部卫星跟踪丢失的现象，该文研究了导航接收机跟踪环路在面临带内和带外双频干扰时的效应预测模型。通过对接收机射频前端的阻塞机理分析，以矢量分析的方法推导了射频前端信号的增益公式，并结合接收机跟踪环路相关处理的过程，得到了带外和带内双频干扰下的效应预测模型。之后以载噪比门限值为失锁判据，开展了双频干扰效应试验，试验结果表明上述模型能够对接收机内部卫星跟踪的状态进行预测，预测误差小于±1 dB，且对于窄带和宽带干扰信号同样适用。
- 卫星导航接收机 /
- 带外和带内双频 /
- 预测模型 /
- 载噪比门限值
Abstract: In view of the phenomenon that the navigation receiver loses tracking of the satellites due to ElectroMagnetic Interference (EMI) in the complex battlefield electromagnetic environment, the effect prediction model of the navigation receiver’ tracking loop, when facing in-band and out-of-band dual-frequency interference is studied. Through the analysis of the blocking mechanism of the receiver’s RF (Radio Frequency) front-end, the gain formula of the RF front-end signal is deduced by the method of vector analysis, and combined with the relevant processing of the receiver, the effect prediction model under out-of-band and in-band dual-frequency interference is obtained. Then, by using the Carrier-to-Noise ratio (C/N₀) threshold as the criterion for loss of lock, a dual-frequency interference effect experiment is carried out. The experiment results show that the above model can predict the state of satellite tracking inside the receiver, whose prediction error is less than ±1 dB, and it is equally applicable to narrowband and wideband interference signals.
- Satellite navigation receiver /
- In-band and out-of-band dual-frequency /
- Effect prediction model /
- Carrier-to-Noise ratio (C/N₀) threshold

HTML全文

图 1 带外单频干扰的矢量图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 带内和带外同时干扰的矢量图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 试验配置框图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 8号卫星的单频敏感阈值

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 第1组双频干扰试验数据

指标	f₁	f₂	R_f	误差(dB)
单频干扰功率阈值(dBm)	–0.76	–85.12	—	—
双频干扰功率阈值(dBm)	–6.99	–86.33	1.089264	0.742663
	–5.96	–87.12	1.050728	0.429806
	–4.96	–87.53	1.072632	0.609015
	–3.96	–88.51	1.055746	0.471189
	–2.98	–89.11	1.091419	0.759830
	–1.97	–92.52	1.014505	0.125084

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 第2组双频干扰试验数据

指标	f₃	f₄	R_f	误差(dB)
单频干扰功率阈值(dBm)	–1.54	–86.2	—	—
双频干扰功率阈值(dBm)	–2.96	–93.2	1.048707	0.413083
	–3.94	–91.4	1.060573	0.510811
	–4.98	–90.6	1.036055	0.307656
	–5.94	–89.4	1.081190	0.678040
	–6.96	–88.8	1.085338	0.711300
	–8.94	–88.2	1.057537	0.485911

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 第3组双频干扰试验数据

指标	f₅	f₆	R_f	误差(dB)
单频干扰功率阈值(dBm)	–1.2	–84.4	—	—
双频干扰功率阈值(dBm)	–2.05	–92.4	1.065265	0.549153
	–3.04	–89.6	1.111091	0.914993
	–4.03	–88.4	1.120045	0.984709
	–5.05	–87.6	1.120578	0.988842
	–6.05	–87	1.121678	0.997364
	–8.05	–86.4	1.085422	0.711972

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(18)

[1]	刘尚合, 刘卫东. 电磁兼容与电磁防护相关研究进展[J]. 高电压技术, 2014, 40(6): 1605–1613. LIU Shanghe and LIU Weidong. Progress of relevant research on electromagnetic compatibility and electromagnetic protection[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2014, 40(6): 1605–1613.
[2]	MANDEEP K, SHIKHA K, and DANVIR M. [C] 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, Kanyakumari, India. 2011: 1–5. doi: 10.1109/ICECTECH.2011.5941844.
[3]	张冬晓, 陈亚洲, 程二威, 等. 用于无人机信息链路电磁干扰预测的动态电磁敏感度测试研究[J]. 高电压技术, 2019, 45(2): 665–672. ZHANG Dongxiao, CHEN Yazhou, CHENG Erwei, et al. Research on dynamic electromagnetic susceptibility for electromagnetic interference prediction of UAV information link[J]. High Voltage Engineering, 2019, 45(2): 665–672.
[4]	周一宇, 安玮, 郭福成. 电子对抗原理与技术[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2014: 183–184. ZHOU Yiyu, AN Wei, and GUO Fucheng. Principles and Electronic Warfare System[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2014: 183–184.
[5]	王雅平, 魏光辉, 潘晓东, 等. 通信电台带外双频干扰预测模型与试验[J]. 电子学报, 2019, 47(4): 826–831. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2019.04.009 WANG Yaping, WEI Guanghui, PAN Xiaodong, et al. Out-of-band dual frequency jamming prediction model and experiment for communication stations[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2019, 47(4): 826–831. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0372-2112.2019.04.009
[6]	刘瑞华, 王晶. 干扰对北斗信号接收性能的影响评估[J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2019, 37(3): 1–4, 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5590.2019.03.001 LIU Ruihua and WANG Jing. Interference impact on Beidou signal reception performance[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2019, 37(3): 1–4, 16. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5590.2019.03.001
[7]	BALAEI A T, DEMPSTER A G, and PRESTI L L. Characterization of the effects of CW and pulse CW interference on the GPS signal quality[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2009, 45(4): 1418–1431. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2009.5310308
[8]	BEK M K, SHAHEEN E M, and ELGAMEL S A. Classification and mathematical expression of different interference signals on a GPS receiver[J]. Navigation, 2015, 62(1): 23–37. doi: 10.1002/navi.77
[9]	刘瑞华, 商鹏. 不同干扰对北斗B1I信号接收机影响[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(8): 1705–1711. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.08.05 LIU Ruihua and SHANG Peng. Effect of difference interferences on Beidou B1I signal receiver[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(8): 1705–1711. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-506X.2019.08.05
[10]	刘春玲, 张自豪. 北斗接收机在干扰下的性能研究[J]. 计算机科学, 2017, 44(2): 163–166, 170. doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.02.025 LIU Chunling and ZHANG Zihao. Performance analysis of Beidou receiver under interference[J]. Computer Science, 2017, 44(2): 163–166, 170. doi: 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137X.2017.02.025
[11]	王晓君, 康娇, 王彦朋. 基于GPS载波跟踪环的窄带干扰性能优化[C]. 复杂电磁环境惊吓装备干扰与抗干扰学术交流大会论文集, 北京, 中国, 2018: 339–344. WANG Xiaojun, KANG Jiao, and WANG Yanpeng. Narrowband interference performance optimization based on GPS carrier tracking loop[C]. 2018 Conference on Equipment Interference and Anti-jamming in Complex Electromagnetic Environment, Beijing, China, 2018: 339–344.
[12]	LIU Yuqi, RAN Yihang, KE Ting, et al. Code tracking performance analysis of GNSS signal in the presence of CW interference[J]. Signal Processing, 2011, 91(4): 970–987. doi: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2010.09.022
[13]	刘禹圻, 胡修林, 冉一航, 等. 卫星导航信号抗单频干扰性能研究[J]. 电子学报, 2011, 39(6): 1410–1416. LIU Yuqi, HU Xiulin, RAN Yihang, et al. Study on evaluating the impact of CWI on DLL tracking performance for GNSS signals[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2011, 39(6): 1410–1416.
[14]	赵惠昌, 张淑宁. 电子对抗理论与方法[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2010: 124–129. ZHAO Huichang and ZHANG Shuning. Electronic Warfare Theory and Methods[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 2010: 124–129.
[15]	LU Wei, CAI Guoqiang, LIU Weibin, et al. Design of nonuniform quantizer in satellite navigation receivers[C]. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and Software Engineering. Berlin, Germany, 2013, 119–128. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-34522-7.
[16]	张克潜, 李德杰. 微波与光电子学中的电磁理论[M]. 2版. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2001. ZHANG Keqian and LI Dejie. Electromagnetic Theory for Microwaves and Optoelectronics[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2001.
[17]	FAN Yuqing, CHENG Erwei, ZHANG Qinglong, et al. Effects of CW interference on the BDS receiver and analysis on the coupling path of electromagnetic energy[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 155885–155893. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949462
[18]	谢钢. GPS原理与接收机设计[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2017: 292–295. XIE Gang. Principles of GPS and Receiver Design[M]. Beijing: Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2017: 292–295.