基于对角积分双谱的海面慢速小目标检测方法

关键; 伍僖杰; 丁昊; 刘宁波; 董云龙; 张鹏飞

doi:10.11999/JEIT210408

基于对角积分双谱的海面慢速小目标检测方法

doi: 10.11999/JEIT210408

关键¹,
伍僖杰¹,
丁昊^{1, 2, ,},
刘宁波¹,
董云龙¹,
张鹏飞³

1.
海军航空大学烟台 264001
2.
军事科学院国防科技创新研究院北京 100071
3.
中国人民解放军92975部队

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(62101583, 61871392, 61871391)

详细信息

作者简介:
关键：男，1967年生，教授，研究方向为雷达目标检测与跟踪、侦察图像处理和信息融合

伍僖杰：男，1997年生，硕士生，研究方向为海杂波中目标检测

丁昊：男，1988年生，副教授，研究方向为海杂波特性认知与抑制、海杂波中目标检测

刘宁波：男，1983年生，副教授，研究方向为雷达信号智能处理、海上目标探测技术

董云龙：男，1974年生，教授，研究方向为多传感器信息融合

张鹏飞：男，1988年生，研究方向为飞行与指挥管理工作

通讯作者:
丁昊　hao3431@tom.com

中图分类号: TN959
计量
- 文章访问数: 1622
- HTML全文浏览量: 622
- PDF下载量: 153
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-05-12
- 修回日期: 2021-09-28
- 网络出版日期: 2021-10-01
- 刊出日期: 2022-07-25

A Method for Detecting Small Slow Targets in Sea Surface Based on Diagonal Integrated Bispectrum

1.
Naval Aviation University, Yantai 264001, China
2.
National Innovation Institute of Defense Technology, Academy of Military Science, Beijing 100071, China
3.
Unit 92975 of the PLA

Funds: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (62101583, 61871392, 61871391)

摘要

摘要: 针对海杂波背景下雷达对海面慢速小目标探测技术难题，该文提出一种基于对角积分双谱的三特征融合检测方法。该方法首先从待检测信号的估计双谱中获得对角积分双谱，而后根据海杂波单元与目标单元之间的非线性耦合差异性，进一步从对角积分双谱中提取峰值、质心频率、谱宽3种特征。考虑到扫描模式下雷达采用的相干脉冲数通常较少，易导致特征不稳定，进而影响海杂波与目标可分性，为此，通过多帧扫描历史数据和当前帧数据的综合应用，对谱特征进行积累得到累积峰值、全变差、累积谱宽3种累积特征。最后采用凸包分类算法，在三特征空间进行融合检测。经实测CSIR数据集验证，在同等参数条件下，该文检测方法相比已有基于时频三特征的检测方法，基于幅度、多普勒三特征检测方法和分形特征检测方法具有更好的检测性能。
- 目标检测 /
- 海杂波 /
- 对角积分双谱 /
- 三特征
Abstract: Considering the technical difficulty of radar to detect small targets embedded in the sea clutter, a three-feature fusion detection method based on diagonal integrated bispectrum is proposed. Firstly, the diagonal integrated bispectrum is obtained from the estimated bispectrum of the signal to be detected. Then, according to the nonlinear coupling difference between sea clutter cell and target cell, three features consist of peak value, centroid frequency and spectrum width are extracted from the diagonal integrated bispectrum. Considering that the number of coherent pulses used by radar in scanning mode is usually small, it is easy to lead to feature instability, and then affect the separability of sea clutter and target. For this reason, through the comprehensive application of multi-frame scanning historical data and current frame data, three cumulative features including cumulative peak value, total variation, cumulative spectrum width are obtained by accumulating three spectrum features. Finally, the convex hull classification algorithm is used to perform fusion detection in three dimensional feature space. The measured CSIR dataset verifies that, under same parameters, the proposed detection method has better detection performance compared with the existing detection methods based on three time-frequency features, amplitude feature and doppler features, fractal feature.
- Target detection /
- Sea clutter /
- Diagonal integrated bispectrum /
- Three features

HTML全文

图 1 海杂波和目标单元双谱估计结果

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 海杂波、目标单元对角积分双谱

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 两类距离单元的对角积分双谱图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 峰值、谱宽谱及直方图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 两类累积特征直方图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 质心谱及全变差特征直方图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 不同虚警率时的凸包分类结果

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 检测器框图

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 4种特征空间内的巴氏距离对比

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 特征来源不同时本文检测器的性能对比

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 变虚警时4类检测器的性能变化(N=64)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 4类检测器的性能比较

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 4类检测器的检测性能曲线

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 CSIR数据库中17个数据集的环境参数

编号	数据集名称	截取时间(s)	平均风速(m/s)	有效波高(m)	夹角(°)	目标单元	信杂比(dB)
1	TFA17_001	4.45	5.40	2.26	253.70	27	10.10
2	TFA17_004	13.25	5.41	2.26	253.68	27～29	3.72
3	TFA17_005	12.17	5.42	2.26	253.68	31	12.44
4	TFA17_006	13.47	5.42	2.26	253.68	29, 30	7.57
5	TFA17_007	13.47	5.44	2.26	253.69	24	11.57
6	TFA17_008	13.47	5.44	2.26	253.70	23, 24	7.88
7	TFA17_009	4.00	5.45	2.26	253.71	23	7.25
8	TFA17_010	26.73	5.47	2.27	253.73	23, 24	9.14
9	TFA17_011	4.60	5.50	2.28	253.77	25	10.49
10	TFA17_012	39.68	6.12	2.30	254.50	14～17	9.82
11	TFA17_013	39.68	6.13	2.30	254.48	18～20	7.78
12	TFA17_014	26.73	6.26	2.35	254.12	18～20	2.61
13	TFC17_001	13.47	5.34	2.27	253.68	27, 28	9.90
14	TFC17_002	13.47	5.36	2.26	253.67	26～28	4.11
15	TFC17_004	20.00	6.10	2.28	254.55	11	13.93
16	TFC17_005	15.14	6.11	2.28	254.53	12, 13	11.84
17	TFC17_006	26.73	6.28	2.35	254.05	24～26	5.07

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 特征来源不同时本文检测器的检测概率(%)

L	DIB, N=128	DSS, N=128	DIB, N=64	DSS, N=64	DIB, N=32	DSS, N=32
10	85.75	81.87	73.75	72.20	71.15	66.83
20	93.70	89.76	81.35	77.85	76.53	75.56
30	95.21	93.09	88.66	85.92	78.39	78.55
40	98.38	92.99	92.26	90.42	84.63	84.30
50	98.36	93.17	94.72	93.00	88.96	88.80
60	99.17	96.12	95.08	94.41	91.04	90.88
70	99.44	97.75	95.85	94.24	92.81	92.81
80	100.00	98.86	97.71	96.50	94.26	93.44
90	100.00	100.00	99.19	97.56	95.56	94.74
100	100.00	100.00	99.86	97.27	96.86	96.37

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 4类检测器的检测概率(N=64)(%)

	本文所提检测器	时频三特征检测器	幅度、多普勒峰高和多普勒商三特征检测器	分形检测器
虚警率0.001	92.26	27.53	32.39	4.87
虚警率0.01	92.78	45.13	32.46	14.21
虚警率0.1	100.00	83.67	83.35	46.41

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 相干脉冲数N降低时检测器的性能变化(%)

编号	本文所提检测器			时频三特征检测器			幅度、多普勒峰高和多普勒商三特征检测器			分形检测器
编号	N=128	N=64	降低量	N=128	N=64	降低量	N=128	N=64	降低量	N=128	N=64	降低量
1	97.01	89.61	7.40	63.58	1.44	62.14	34.10	29.39	4.71	0.00	0.29	–0.29
2	52.72	49.30	3.42	27.66	7.64	20.02	8.90	4.35	4.55	0.00	0.00	0.00
3	67.43	56.58	10.85	30.32	15.47	14.84	25.26	19.58	5.68	2.74	3.26	–0.53
4	50.62	37.28	13.34	21.90	5.99	15.92	9.14	7.51	1.63	0.00	0.29	–0.29
5	72.13	82.05	–9.92	18.06	10.27	7.79	17.87	13.31	4.56	5.51	1.62	3.90
6	38.11	38.46	–0.35	12.36	6.75	5.61	19.96	6.46	13.50	0.00	0.38	–0.38
7	50.85	40.15	10.70	27.56	18.27	9.29	19.87	12.82	7.05	0.64	0.00	0.64
8	41.75	49.17	–7.42	17.93	7.85	10.07	24.26	16.19	8.07	3.07	0.86	2.21
9	47.14	71.25	–24.11	37.99	20.61	17.38	27.37	20.61	6.76	2.79	1.11	1.68
10	88.62	89.93	–1.31	46.96	14.97	32.00	51.10	31.16	19.94	5.36	5.52	–0.15
11	72.49	70.80	1.68	30.73	12.74	17.99	19.24	11.48	7.75	0.90	0.55	0.36
12	49.10	40.82	8.28	21.26	4.84	16.42	2.78	2.64	0.14	0.38	0.91	–0.53
13	68.72	64.89	3.83	12.74	5.32	7.41	23.76	15.78	7.98	5.13	2.19	2.95
14	50.62	39.25	11.37	27.00	15.49	11.50	12.55	7.70	4.85	3.80	0.86	2.95
15	98.38	92.26	6.13	61.72	27.53	34.19	36.88	32.39	4.48	8.19	4.87	3.33
16	98.55	88.99	9.56	60.41	33.25	27.16	56.18	44.42	11.76	8.29	3.47	4.82
17	66.14	56.29	9.84	26.15	9.58	16.57	17.05	12.70	4.35	3.16	2.40	0.77

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(27)

[1]	关键. 雷达海上目标特性综述[J]. 雷达学报, 2020, 9(4): 674–683. doi: 10.12000/JR20114 GUAN Jian. Summary of marine radar target characteristics[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 674–683. doi: 10.12000/JR20114
[2]	王雪松, 杨勇. 海杂波与目标极化特性研究进展[J]. 电波科学学报, 2019, 34(6): 665–675. doi: 10.13443/j.cjors.2019103101 WANG Xuesong and YANG Yong. Overview on cognition of clutter and target polarization characteristics for maritime radar[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2019, 34(6): 665–675. doi: 10.13443/j.cjors.2019103101
[3]	何友, 黄勇, 关键, 等. 海杂波中的雷达目标检测技术综述[J]. 现代雷达, 2014, 36(12): 1–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2014.12.001 HE You, HUANG Yong, GUAN Jian, et al. An overview on radar target detection in sea clutter[J]. Modern Radar, 2014, 36(12): 1–9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7859.2014.12.001
[4]	张坤, 水鹏朗, 王光辉. 相参雷达K分布海杂波背景下非相干积累恒虚警检测方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2020, 42(7): 1627–1635. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190441 ZHANG Kun, SHUI Penglang, and WANG Guanghui. Non-coherent integration constant false alarm rate detectors against K-distributed sea clutter for coherent radar systems[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2020, 42(7): 1627–1635. doi: 10.11999/JEIT190441
[5]	许述文, 薛健, 水鹏朗. 基于知识的海杂波背景下距离扩展目标检测[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2016, 38(12): 3004–3010. doi: 10.11999/JEIT160905 XU Shuwen, XUE Jian, and SHUI Penglang. Adaptive detection of range-spread targets based on knowledge in sea clutter background[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2016, 38(12): 3004–3010. doi: 10.11999/JEIT160905
[6]	徐涛, 吴军, 夏海宝, 等. 基于频域CFAR方法的PD雷达回波信号处理[J]. 现代防御技术, 2012, 40(1): 140–143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2012.01.030 XU Tao, WU Jun, XIA Haibao, et al. PD radar echo processing based on the method of CFAR in frequency domain[J]. Modern Defence Technology, 2012, 40(1): 140–143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-086x.2012.01.030
[7]	许述文, 白晓惠, 郭子薰, 等. 海杂波背景下雷达目标特征检测方法的现状与展望[J]. 雷达学报, 2020, 9(4): 684–714. doi: 10.12000/JR20084 XU Shuwen, BAI Xiaohui, GUO Zixun, et al. Status and prospects of feature-based detection methods for floating targets on the sea surface[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 684–714. doi: 10.12000/JR20084
[8]	HU Jing, TUNG W W, and GAO Jianbo. Detection of low observable targets within sea clutter by structure function based multifractal analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2006, 54(1): 136–143. doi: 10.1109/TAP.2005.861541
[9]	LUO Feng, ZHANG Danting, and ZHANG Bo. The fractal properties of sea clutter and their applications in maritime target detection[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2013, 10(6): 1295–1299. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2013.2237750
[10]	FAN Yifei, TAO Mingliang, SU Jia, et al. Weak target detection based on joint fractal characteristics of autoregressive spectrum in sea clutter background[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2019, 16(12): 1824–1828. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2019.2912329
[11]	SHUI Penglang, LI Dongchen, and XU Shuwen. Tri-feature-based detection of floating small targets in sea clutter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2014, 50(2): 1416–1430. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2014.120657
[12]	SHI Sainan and SHUI Penglang. Sea-surface floating small target detection by one-class classifier in time-frequency feature space[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2018, 56(11): 6395–6411. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2018.2838260
[13]	郭子薰, 水鹏朗, 白晓惠, 等. 海杂波中基于可控虚警K近邻的海面小目标检测[J]. 雷达学报, 2020, 9(4): 654–663. doi: 10.12000/JR20055 GUO Zixun, SHUI Penglang, BAI Xiaohui, et al. Sea-surface small target detection based on K-NN with controlled false alarm rate in sea clutter[J]. Journal of Radars, 2020, 9(4): 654–663. doi: 10.12000/JR20055
[14]	GUO Zixun and SHUI Penglang. Anomaly based sea-surface small target detection using K-nearest neighbor classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2020, 56(6): 4947–4964. doi: 10.1109/TAES.2020.3011868
[15]	SHUI Penglang, GUO Zixun, and SHI Sainan. Feature-compression-based detection of sea-surface small targets[J] IEEE Access, 2019, 8: 8371–8385. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962793.
[16]	SHUI Penglang, GUO Zixun. Sea-surface floating small target detection based on feature compression[J]. The Journal of Engineering, 2019, 2019(21): 8160–8164. doi: 10.1049/joe.2019.0694
[17]	陈小龙, 关键, 于晓涵, 等. 基于短时稀疏时频分布的雷达目标微动特征提取及检测方法[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2017, 39(5): 1017–1023. doi: 10.11999/JEIT161040 CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian, YU Xiaohan, et al. Radar Micro-Doppler signature extraction and detection via short-time sparse time-frequency distribution[J]. Journal of Electronics &Information Technology, 2017, 39(5): 1017–1023. doi: 10.11999/JEIT161040
[18]	李东宸, 水鹏朗, 许述文. 块白化杂波抑制的海面漂浮小目标检测方法[J]. 西安电子科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 43(6): 21–26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2016.06.004 LI Dongchen, SHUI Penglang, and XU Shuwen. Floating small target detection in the sea clutter via block-whitened clutter suppression[J]. Journal of Xidian University, 2016, 43(6): 21–26. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2400.2016.06.004
[19]	XU Shuwen, ZHENG Jibin, PU Jia, et al. Sea-surface floating small target detection based on polarization features[J]. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 2018, 15(10): 1505–1509. doi: 10.1109/LGRS.2018.2852560
[20]	CHEN Xiaolong, GUAN Jian, HUANG Yong, et al. Radon-linear canonical ambiguity function-based detection and estimation method for marine target with micromotion[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2015, 53(4): 2225–2240. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2358456
[21]	陈世超, 罗丰, 胡冲, 等. 基于多普勒谱非广延熵的海面目标检测方法[J]. 雷达学报, 2019, 8(3): 344–354. doi: 10.12000/JR19012 CHEN Shichao, LUO Feng, HU Chong, et al. Small target detection in sea clutter background based on tsallis entropy of Doppler spectrum[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(3): 344–354. doi: 10.12000/JR19012
[22]	李军伟. 双谱分析新方法及其工程应用研究[D]. [硕士论文], 郑州大学, 2006. LI Junwei. A new method of bispectral analysis and its engineering application[D]. [Master dissertation], Zhengzhou University, 2006.
[23]	TANG Li and JIANG Ting. Target identification based on diagonal slice of the complex bispectrum[C]. Proceedings of 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communiction Problem-solving, Beijing, China, 2014: 303–306. doi: 10.1109/ICCPS.2014.7062279.
[24]	ZHANG Xianda, SHI Yu, and BAO Zheng. A new feature vector using selected bispectra for signal classification with application in radar target recognition[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2001, 49(9): 1875–1885. doi: 10.1109/78.942617
[25]	HERSELMAN P L, BAKER C J, and DE WIND H J. An analysis of X-band calibrated sea clutter and small boat reflectivity at medium-to-low grazing angles[J]. International Journal of Navigation and Observation, 2008, 2008: 347518. doi: 10.1155/2008/347518
[26]	HERSELMAN P L and BAKER C J. Analysis of calibrated sea clutter and boat reflectivity data at C- and X-band in south African coastal waters[C]. Proceedings of 2007 IET International Conference on Radar Systems, Edinburgh, UK, 2007. doi: 10.1049/cp:20070616.
[27]	丁昊, 刘宁波, 董云龙, 等. 雷达海杂波测量试验回顾与展望[J]. 雷达学报, 2019, 8(3): 281–302. doi: 10.12000/JR19006 DING Hao, LIU Ningbo, DONG Yunlong, et al. Overview and prospects of radar sea clutter measurement experiments[J]. Journal of Radars, 2019, 8(3): 281–302. doi: 10.12000/JR19006